Does such a bag exist?

Posted 10/06/2010 - 10:53 Link
Hi all

Just wondering if people have any recommendations for kit bags. I'm after something to use as a kit carrier and also general purpose rucksack for when I'm on holiday or out walking. I put together a list of things I'm looking for and things that would be nice to have:

Must-haves:
- Space for kit (GX20, Sigma 100-300, walkaround lens, 1 other lens or flash, plus some accessories such as filters and spare batteries)
- Separate space for sundry stuff (layers, water, book, binoculars etc)
- Easy access to kit, or at least the camera (I'm thinking of those side access or separate openings)

Nice-to-haves:
- Tripod/monopod holder
- Some pockets for organising sundry bits (like the filters and memory cards)
- Potential space for other kit (e.g. another couple of lenses/flash)
- Something that doesn't scream "camera kit" to deter thieves

Preferably I'd like it to be big enough for me to keep the camera and big Sigma lense attached and readily accessible. Again, I'm thinking of something like the Lowepro bags with side access but one wide enough to accomodate that lens. I don't take a laptop with me so a laptop compartment isn't needed.

Does anyone have anything to recommend? I'm planning on taking a trip to Jacobs at lunch to have a look at their range and may also try Calumet. Jessops have an appalling range, I've discovered.

Cheers,

WG
You will only prise my 43Ltd from my cold, dead hands...
johnriley
Posted 10/06/2010 - 11:14 Link
Billingham Hadley range - it will fit all you need with no wasted space.
Best regards, John
robbie_d
Posted 10/06/2010 - 11:24 Link
johnriley wrote:
Billingham Hadley range - it will fit all you need with no wasted space.
The Hadley bags always look a little too shallow to store a body with an average sized lens on. That's my impression anyway, I could well be wrong.
If you can't say something nice about Pentax, you won't say anything at all.

Apparently.
johnriley
Posted 10/06/2010 - 11:30 - Helpful Comment Link
Quote:
The Hadley bags always look a little too shallow to store a body with an average sized lens on. That's my impression anyway, I could well be wrong.
I store the camera and lens in the centre section, vertically. Gravity may even help to let dust fall off the sensor....I admit that I have added a double section to this centre area to enable the camera to be cradled and add a second storage space. There's plenty of space for say a 55-300mm DA lens + K20D.
[IMG]http://i240.photobucket.com/albums/ff250/johnriley1uk/036-Hadley-1.jpg[/IMG]
[IMG]http://i240.photobucket.com/albums/ff250/johnriley1uk/037-Hadley-2.jpg[/IMG]
Best regards, John
edumad
Posted 10/06/2010 - 11:55 Link
Tamrac Aero Speed pack 85 Doesn't have a tripod holder though, but I wouldn't recommend it.
Kata 3n1-30.

Both will look like a camera bag though.
The only way not to look like a camera is for the bag to not be a camera bag. So buying inserts, which means, not very easy to get a fast access functionality.

I kind of gave up on the whole idea of fast access and just carry the camera on my hand the whole time, and stop when changing lenses.
robbie_d
Posted 10/06/2010 - 12:11 Link
johnriley wrote:
Quote:
The Hadley bags always look a little too shallow to store a body with an average sized lens on. That's my impression anyway, I could well be wrong.
I store the camera and lens in the centre section, vertically. Gravity may even help to let dust fall off the sensor....I admit that I have added a double section to this centre area to enable the camera to be cradled and add a second storage space. There's plenty of space for say a 55-300mm DA lens + K20D.
[IMG]http://i240.photobucket.com/albums/ff250/johnriley1uk/036-Hadley-1.jpg[/IMG]
[IMG]http://i240.photobucket.com/albums/ff250/johnriley1uk/037-Hadley-2.jpg[/IMG]
Thanks for the images John, very informative. I only wish they were a little less shallow to allow a gripped K20D to fit in, then it would be getting ordered (I'm in the market for a new bag myself).
If you can't say something nice about Pentax, you won't say anything at all.

Apparently.
Posted 10/06/2010 - 12:12 Link
Thanks guys. The Hadley looks a bit small for the Sigma (and a few bits of non-camera kit). I'll have a look for it when I go to window shop though.

The Kata and Tamrac look like they definitely have the room. I wasn't sure if you were saying you wouldn't recommend either though. If so, any reasons why?

To be honest, it would be nice if the bag didn't look like a camera bag but that probably isn't possible.
You will only prise my 43Ltd from my cold, dead hands...
pentaxian450
Posted 10/06/2010 - 12:43 Link
You should look at Crumpler bags or National Geographic.
Yves (another one of those crazy Canucks)
Anvh
Posted 10/06/2010 - 13:31 - Helpful Comment Link
I think the Lowe Primus AW would be your best bet but slightly too small for everything. link
Or elses the Crumpler Half Photo Backpacks, it's big enough comes in 3 sizes but easy access might be a bit of a problem link

One thing though, you don't want it to scream camera bag but would want a tripod holder
Stefan
Comment Image

K10D, K5
DA* 16-50, DA* 50-135, D-FA 100 Macro, DA 40 Ltd, DA 18-55
AF-540FGZ
Edited by Anvh: 10/06/2010 - 13:34
Posted 10/06/2010 - 13:56 Link
Anvh wrote:

One thing though, you don't want it to scream camera bag but would want a tripod holder
Good point

Thanks for the links. Both seem to be fairly good bets as well.
You will only prise my 43Ltd from my cold, dead hands...
edumad
Posted 10/06/2010 - 15:20 Link
The Tamrac does what you wnat except for having a tripod holder and still looking like a camera bag.
The kata can come with a tripod holder, but the "other stuff" compartment is smaller. Still looks like a camera bag.

The National Geographic ones look less like camera bags, but if you use a tripod with, it becomes a camera bag...

I wouldn't buy a shoulder bag for heavy loads, especially when walking about in the countryside.
johnriley
Posted 10/06/2010 - 15:23 Link
Quote:
I wouldn't buy a shoulder bag for heavy loads, especially when walking about in the countryside
To put this another way, I wouldn't carry heavy loads when walking in the countryside.

Travel light is my motto.
Best regards, John
edumad
Posted 10/06/2010 - 17:48 Link
Good point. But easier to get a proper load distributing bag than changing the desire to take lenses and more lenses and a tripod and filters and spare batteries and lunch, and jacket and...
matwhittington
Posted 10/06/2010 - 19:28 - Helpful Comment Link
I would also suggest a look at the Lowe Alpine Primus AW. I use one and think it is a very good bag and would meet, I think, the majority of your requirements. It has a side access although it works better if the camera is not gripped. You can stash a camera in the bottom section with a big lens on (certainly up to the size of a sigma 120-400mm - never had a bigma, and that might just be too big...: I can happily fill mine (when the mood takes me) with K-7, DA*300, Sigma 100-300, DA*50-135, sigma 10-20, flashgun, 35mm and 100mm macro and still squeeze in filters and munchy bars, and be able to use the big exterior pocket for a lightweight waterproof and there's still a couple of loops on the outside for a tripod... Worth a look at least

Regards

Mat
Mat W

My Flickr: link
Anvh
Posted 10/06/2010 - 19:58 Link
matwhittington wrote:
I can happily fill mine (when the mood takes me) with K-7, DA*300, Sigma 100-300, DA*50-135, sigma 10-20, flashgun, 35mm and 100mm macro and still squeeze in filters and munchy bars, and be able to use the big exterior pocket for a lightweight waterproof and there's still a couple of loops on the outside for a tripod... Worth a look at least
Oh wow that's a lot Mat, is that while also using the upper compartment for lenses?
If so do you protect them or anything?
Stefan
Comment Image

K10D, K5
DA* 16-50, DA* 50-135, D-FA 100 Macro, DA 40 Ltd, DA 18-55
AF-540FGZ
Edited by Anvh: 10/06/2010 - 19:58

Add Comment

To leave a comment - Log in to Pentax User or create a new account.



Proudly supporting Pentax User

Samsung Logo Asahi Pentax Logo