digiscoping - anyone do it here?
Posted 16/05/2012 - 21:00
Link
I tried it with an astronomical telescope (4.5" newtonian reflector). My biggest problem was getting a secure connection on the eyepiece with the camera. Most important tip is not to drop the camera (or knock the scope over) both of which are easier than you think.
Posted 16/05/2012 - 22:42
Link
johnha wrote:
My biggest problem was getting a secure connection on the eyepiece with the camera.
Some digiscopes either come with (or have available) a T2 mount adapter. The issue is that the odd eyepiece angle for most them makes it tricky to stop the attached camera from pulling the scope over to the side.My biggest problem was getting a secure connection on the eyepiece with the camera.
To solve it I purchased a Manfrotto 293 lens support to help keep it steady and it worked! Also useful for long telephotos that don't have their own tripod attachment.
Having tried it though I didn't find the results as good as a dedicated camera lens, but it was only a fairly cheap scope so perhaps to be expected.
John
John K
Posted 16/05/2012 - 23:08
Link
I've toyed with the idea and looked at digiscoping a lot over the years - mostly from a bird photography point of view. I've come to the conclusion that for that purpose the scope is far more critical than the camera. I have seen some stunning pictures with a very cheap compact and a very expensive Swarovski scope. Not many good ones with DSLR's. I also came to the conclusion that good results could be obtained while under certain specific conditions of good light and static birds at low level and great distance. I also concluded that it was too much hassle and expense for the limited use I would get. May be different for astronomy though. Just my opinion, others swear by it.
Posted 17/05/2012 - 01:20
Link
I've used a cheap Tasco scope, to photograph powerboats at over half a mile. Results were better than I would have got cropping a shorter lens but not by much. The images just looking through the scope being much better.
I suspect that the camera amplifies any errors in the scope - so as said above an excellent scope is required to get good results.
You'll also need a VERY sturdy tripod, & careful focusing - with no aperture control the focus varies considerably at distances most of my telephoto lenses would think were well into the infinity band.
I suspect that the camera amplifies any errors in the scope - so as said above an excellent scope is required to get good results.
You'll also need a VERY sturdy tripod, & careful focusing - with no aperture control the focus varies considerably at distances most of my telephoto lenses would think were well into the infinity band.
Mike
.
Pentax:K5ii, K7, K100D, DA18-55, DA10-17, DA55-300, DA50-200, F100-300, F50, DA35 AL, 4* M50, 2* M135, Helicoid extension, Tak 300 f4 (& 6 film bodies)
3rd Party: Bigmos (Sigma 150-500mm OS HSM),2* 28mm, 100mm macro, 28-200 zoom, 35-80 zoom, 80-200 zoom, 80-210 zoom, 300mm M42, 600 mirror, 1000-4000 scope, 50mm M42, enlarger lenses, Sony & micro 4/3 cameras with various PK mounts, Zenit E...
Far to many tele-converters, adapters, project parts & extension tubes etc.
.[size=11:].Flickr• WPF• Panoramio
.
Pentax:K5ii, K7, K100D, DA18-55, DA10-17, DA55-300, DA50-200, F100-300, F50, DA35 AL, 4* M50, 2* M135, Helicoid extension, Tak 300 f4 (& 6 film bodies)
3rd Party: Bigmos (Sigma 150-500mm OS HSM),2* 28mm, 100mm macro, 28-200 zoom, 35-80 zoom, 80-200 zoom, 80-210 zoom, 300mm M42, 600 mirror, 1000-4000 scope, 50mm M42, enlarger lenses, Sony & micro 4/3 cameras with various PK mounts, Zenit E...
Far to many tele-converters, adapters, project parts & extension tubes etc.
.[size=11:].Flickr• WPF• Panoramio
Posted 17/05/2012 - 21:29
Link
I've had a little go at it using an Acuter 80mm. This has a T2 thread under the eyepeice rubber so was easy to mount a Pentax on to it.
Had mixed results and being honest the best was after making an adapter to fit over a Fuji compact digital. With the T2 fitting I fitted extention tubes to it and then the camera which gave a more adjustable zoom with different tubes.
These are a reasonable price scope if you just want to play. There is a difference in this and a £800 opticron but for £150 I think it aint half bad.
Here is a link to Fliker pictures taken with a 35mm film camera, Before I had Digital. The pictures across the sea are from Hunstanton across the Wash to Butlins at Skegness.
http://flic.kr/s/aHsjzr1ZpL
Patty
Had mixed results and being honest the best was after making an adapter to fit over a Fuji compact digital. With the T2 fitting I fitted extention tubes to it and then the camera which gave a more adjustable zoom with different tubes.
These are a reasonable price scope if you just want to play. There is a difference in this and a £800 opticron but for £150 I think it aint half bad.
Here is a link to Fliker pictures taken with a 35mm film camera, Before I had Digital. The pictures across the sea are from Hunstanton across the Wash to Butlins at Skegness.
http://flic.kr/s/aHsjzr1ZpL
Patty
Add Comment
To leave a comment - Log in to Pentax User or create a new account.


37 posts
17 years
paul