Columb John Chapel, (five pictures)

bwlchmawr
Posted 03/08/2010 - 19:56 Link
This little building is on the Killerton estate in Devonshire. It was built in 1841 to replace an earlier 17th Century building.
[IMG]http://i927.photobucket.com/albums/ad116/ADC3440/Columb%20John%20Chapel/Pictures048.jpg[/IMG]
[IMG]http://i927.photobucket.com/albums/ad116/ADC3440/Columb%20John%20Chapel/Pictures040a.jpg[/IMG]
[IMG]http://i927.photobucket.com/albums/ad116/ADC3440/Columb%20John%20Chapel/Pictures045a.jpg[/IMG]
[IMG]http://i927.photobucket.com/albums/ad116/ADC3440/Columb%20John%20Chapel/Pictures042.jpg[/IMG]
All pictures K100D with Pentax 35-70 mf.
Best wishes,

Andrew

"These places mean something and it's the job of a photographer to figure-out what the hell it is."
Robert Adams
"The camera doesn't make a bit of difference.  All of them can record what you are seeing.  But, you have to SEE."
Ernst Hass
My website: http://www.ephotozine.com/user/bwlchmawr-199050
http://s927.photobucket.com/home/ADC3440/index
https://www.flickr.com/photos/78898196@N05
Edited by bwlchmawr: 03/08/2010 - 19:59
matwhittington
Posted 03/08/2010 - 20:19 Link
Andrew - I really like the last two - the last one especially. I think it's the apparent textures, in the fourth I especially like the rusty metal against the aged wood, the weathered stone (all in muted tones) set against the bright green and pink of the plant, which of course renews itself every year and looks quite pristine - very nice indeed

Regards
Mat W

My Flickr: link
Father Ted
Posted 03/08/2010 - 20:30 Link
I have to echo Mat. I like the last two very much.
Getting there! Thanks to you guys

Pentax K3ii, Pentax K10d, Kit lens ( 18-55mm ), 50mm f1.7 lens, Tamron 70-300mm lens, Prinzflex 70-162 manual lens, Various old flashes.
aliengrove
Posted 03/08/2010 - 22:43 Link
Last two for me too, I especially like the second last one, the dead ivy makes the shot, lovely!
i-Berg
Posted 04/08/2010 - 06:36 Link
And last one for me Andrew - as per comment on Photobucket (which I was in before getting to this!).
Edited by i-Berg: 04/08/2010 - 06:36
bwlchmawr
Posted 04/08/2010 - 12:12 Link
Thank you for your kind comments, gents. I too like the last two most but I thought the first ones at least provided some context.
Best wishes,

Andrew

"These places mean something and it's the job of a photographer to figure-out what the hell it is."
Robert Adams
"The camera doesn't make a bit of difference.  All of them can record what you are seeing.  But, you have to SEE."
Ernst Hass
My website: http://www.ephotozine.com/user/bwlchmawr-199050
http://s927.photobucket.com/home/ADC3440/index
https://www.flickr.com/photos/78898196@N05
Technoblurb
Posted 04/08/2010 - 12:20 Link
The 3 & 4 for me as well, the detail & texture contrasted with the incidental flora works. I like the composition of 1 but it lacks the pazazz of 3 & 4. I'm afraid number 2 does nothing for me, as a suggestion you could try and increase the contrast to provide a grater feeling of depth.
bwlchmawr
Posted 04/08/2010 - 14:17 Link
Technoblurb wrote:
I'm afraid number 2 does nothing for me, as a suggestion you could try and increase the contrast to provide a grater feeling of depth.
Yes it's a frustrating shot. It looked good when I took it (light not the problem) and I wanted to keep the composition quite tight. It seemed an obvious candidate for conversion but it just hasn't worked out. I'll have another go, I think.
Best wishes,

Andrew

"These places mean something and it's the job of a photographer to figure-out what the hell it is."
Robert Adams
"The camera doesn't make a bit of difference.  All of them can record what you are seeing.  But, you have to SEE."
Ernst Hass
My website: http://www.ephotozine.com/user/bwlchmawr-199050
http://s927.photobucket.com/home/ADC3440/index
https://www.flickr.com/photos/78898196@N05
bwlchmawr
Posted 04/08/2010 - 17:51 Link
Here's a "worked on" version of the graveyard. More contrast added. Not sure if it's any better...
[IMG]http://i927.photobucket.com/albums/ad116/ADC3440/Columb%20John%20Chapel/Pictures040b.jpg[/IMG]
Best wishes,

Andrew

"These places mean something and it's the job of a photographer to figure-out what the hell it is."
Robert Adams
"The camera doesn't make a bit of difference.  All of them can record what you are seeing.  But, you have to SEE."
Ernst Hass
My website: http://www.ephotozine.com/user/bwlchmawr-199050
http://s927.photobucket.com/home/ADC3440/index
https://www.flickr.com/photos/78898196@N05
womble
Posted 04/08/2010 - 18:21 Link
The first one is a nice postcard shot of the church. Not sure what is wrong with the second one but it seems flat to me. The third one is very nice, the last one is a stunner. Excellent shot.

Best wishes, Kris.
Kris Lockyear
It is an illusion that photos are made with the camera… they are made with the eye, heart and head. Henri Cartier-Bresson
Lots of film bodies, a couple of digital ones, too many lenses (mainly older glass) and a Horseman LE 5x4.
bwlchmawr
Posted 04/08/2010 - 20:10 Link
Looking at the two versions of no.2 I think contast was at least part of the problem, Kris, but I still feel it's a bit lacking. Glad you like the last one: I stuck it on my Gallery!
Best wishes,

Andrew

"These places mean something and it's the job of a photographer to figure-out what the hell it is."
Robert Adams
"The camera doesn't make a bit of difference.  All of them can record what you are seeing.  But, you have to SEE."
Ernst Hass
My website: http://www.ephotozine.com/user/bwlchmawr-199050
http://s927.photobucket.com/home/ADC3440/index
https://www.flickr.com/photos/78898196@N05
Pentaxophile
Posted 04/08/2010 - 20:50 Link
The last two are lovely, specially the one with dead ivy! I'm not sure if its the composition which doesn't work in shot 2, or that the gravestones do not stand out very much from the background. Perhaps a bit of both. The conversion looks burned out to my eyes!

I also like no.1, its a nice image to set the scene.
Technoblurb
Posted 04/08/2010 - 21:34 Link
I have had a quick fiddle your graveyard shot, and I do mean quick, 5 mins. I applied a curve to the whole image and reduced the brightness on the two lighter grave stones, then applied some burning to the mid tones on the gravestones. Hope you don't mind.

Comment Image


Graham
thoughton
Posted 04/08/2010 - 22:56 Link
3 and 4 for me too Andrew, 4 especially is fabulous. Including the flower was inspired, well done

I think the main problem with 2 is the edges of the headstones are too similar in tone to the background grass so they don't pop like they should. Can we see the colour version?
Tim
AF - Pentax K5, Sigma 10-20/4-5.6, Tamron 17-50/2.8, Sigma 30/1.4, Sigma 70-200/2.8, Tamron 70-300/4-5.6
MF - Vivitar CF 28/2.8, Tamron AD2 90/2.5, MTO 1000/11
Stuff - Metz 58 AF1, Cactus v4, Nikon SB24, Raynox 150, Sigma 1.4x TC, Sigma 2x TC, Kenko 2x macro TC, Redsnapper 283 tripod, iMac 27”, Macbook Pro 17”, iPad, iPhone 3G
Flickr • Fluidr • PPG • Street • Portfolio site
Feel free to edit any of my posted photos! If I post a photo for critique, I want brutal honesty. If you don't like it, please say so and tell me why!
bwlchmawr
Posted 05/08/2010 - 19:05 Link
Definitely an improved version, Graham. Thank you for trying.

Tim, glad you like the rose picture. Here's the colour original of the graveyard shot:
[IMG]http://i927.photobucket.com/albums/ad116/ADC3440/Columb%20John%20Chapel/Pictures040.jpg[/IMG]
Best wishes,

Andrew

"These places mean something and it's the job of a photographer to figure-out what the hell it is."
Robert Adams
"The camera doesn't make a bit of difference.  All of them can record what you are seeing.  But, you have to SEE."
Ernst Hass
My website: http://www.ephotozine.com/user/bwlchmawr-199050
http://s927.photobucket.com/home/ADC3440/index
https://www.flickr.com/photos/78898196@N05

Add Comment

To leave a comment - Log in to Pentax User or create a new account.



Proudly supporting Pentax User

Samsung Logo Asahi Pentax Logo