Coastal Walking today.

Posted 19/08/2022 - 16:33 Link
Kp and DA* 11-18mm and CPL, around midday so the light was harsh, SOOC.

1.
Comment Image


2.
Comment Image


3.
Comment Image


4.
Comment Image
davidwozhere
Posted 20/08/2022 - 00:17 Link
I'm getting envious of your nice lens. Nice set and, bright or not, you got the best out of the light.
Both the *istDS and the K5 are incurably addicted to old glass

My page on Photocrowd
Posted 20/08/2022 - 10:50 Link
Thank you David.
This lens has been described as a great piece of engineering, or something like that. I can see why, internal focus, internal zoom, the elements, filter compatible, some FF at 16 to 18mm etc and sharpness everywhere. Not too heavy, AW resistance, Star rated. I've just got to hopefully get somewhere near it's performance level LOL.
pschlute
Posted 20/08/2022 - 21:19 Link
these are not working for me I am afraid. The light was too harsh, as you admitted.

Go back at sunrise or sunset.
Posted 20/08/2022 - 22:53 Link
pschlute wrote:
these are not working for me I am afraid. The light was too harsh, as you admitted.

Go back at sunrise or sunset.
Why 'too harsh', Peter? (Serious question.) Learning for me from this.
Be well, stay safe, but most of all, invest in memories
Lubbyman
Posted 20/08/2022 - 23:31 Link
Harsh light isn't a problem for me, but the sloping horizon in No. 3 is... Having said that, the others don't quite work for me either - they seem a bit flat while at the same time the foreground and distance pull in different directions. I hope you don't mind, but I've experimented with different crops and giving more contrast by adjusting curves. Here are the results. But as always, it's all a matter of personal preference.

Comment Image


Comment Image


Comment Image


Steve
Posted 21/08/2022 - 10:41 Link
Thank you all peeps for the comments.
Steve, I have corrected the horizon on number 3 (hopefully, whoops).
No problem with your editing, crop away etc. I was reasonably happy with the shadows in my rocks in numbers 3 and 4, and close up in No. 4 especially, but your added contrast does improve it, and yes No.1 looks better cropped.
Here's the level horizon (hopefully,- I have one leg longer than the other)
Comment Image


Here's another POV of the same and this would definitely benefit from a crop I suspect;

Comment Image


Peter, going back at ideal times are not always possible at least not without a Pass from the 'Boss

"Why 'too harsh', Peter? (Serious question.) Learning for me from this."
Me too,
MrB
Posted 21/08/2022 - 11:58 Link
As Steve has commented, it is personal preference and in 3 and 4 I would prefer to see more detail by lifting the shadows. In an image like number 1, I would try to enhance the sky:

Comment Image

Cheers.
Philip
pschlute
Posted 21/08/2022 - 16:54 Link
Urbanmeister wrote:
pschlute wrote:
these are not working for me I am afraid. The light was too harsh, as you admitted.

Go back at sunrise or sunset.
Why 'too harsh', Peter? (Serious question.) Learning for me from this.
The trouble with bright sunshine when it is high in the sky is that you can get high contrast images with a lot of shadow areas that record little or no detail. Harsh direct lighting also fails to give subjects "form" or shape (think single flash). You can also suffer from blown out or specular highlights, although this is not evident here as LOT has exposed these very well.

Strong lighting especially when the sun is lower can bring out texture however. The bottom right corner of 3 is an example of this. I would have been inclined to do a close up image of this area where the texture is the main element.

I realise we all have to work with the time of day we are at and the lighting conditions that are present, and sometimes it is not possible to return at a different hour. in these circumstances taking bracketed shots and merging them in HDR software (or in camera) can be beneficial.
Posted 21/08/2022 - 17:02 Link
Thank you, Peter, appreciated. Really useful info especially the 'bracketed shots and merging them in HDR...' Great stuff.
Be well, stay safe, but most of all, invest in memories
Edited by Urbanmeister: 21/08/2022 - 17:02
Lubbyman
Posted 21/08/2022 - 19:04 Link
There's an interesting book by Joe Cornish, title 'First Light', subtitle 'A Landscape Photographer's Art'. For each of the main pictures, there's a second that he took of the same or similar subject in different light, time of day, weather etc.. Most importantly, he explains why he prefers the main picture to the second one. You don't have to agree with his preferences but his reasons make you think about how you look at your own pictures and how you might do better. It isn't always a matter of waiting for the 'right' weather or time of day. Sometimes just a shift in position or even using a suitable filter can make all the difference (he was using film so for digital replace 'filter' by 'post-processing' :wink.

Steve
Posted 21/08/2022 - 19:16 Link
Lubbyman, what an absolutely cracking post. Thank you, Steve. I've just ordered the book, from Abe Books, £3.29 or £3.56p from Amazon. FYI, I always look at Abe Books first, it's one of my alternative for books when I don't want to buy new. Recommended by the way. One continues to learn, don't we? (Do you ever stop?) 96% 4 and 5* feedback reviews on Amazon.
Be well, stay safe, but most of all, invest in memories
Edited by Urbanmeister: 21/08/2022 - 19:23
cardiffgareth
Posted 21/08/2022 - 19:49 Link
Pic 3 for me - with the corrected horizon!
Gareth Williams ARPS

My outfit: K1ii - Pentax D FA 24-70mm f2.8 - Pentax DA* 300mm f4 - Pentax modified DA* 60-250mm f4 - Irix 15mm Firefly - Pentax FA 35mm - FA 50mm f1.4 - Tamron SP 90mm macro - Pentax AF 540 FGZ II

Welsh Photographer
Flickr
Instagram
My PPG
Foundation NFT

Add Comment

To leave a comment - Log in to Pentax User or create a new account.



Proudly supporting Pentax User

Samsung Logo Asahi Pentax Logo