Church doors

Error
  • You need to be logged in to vote on this poll

judderman62

Link Posted 28/05/2014 - 23:46
Putting aside whether either shot is good or interesting which Looks better of the two ?


A.




or

B.




Do the red gas containers make the image more interesting , or are they too distracting and draw the eye to them and make the doors secondary ?

What say you folks ?

If it was B I'd probably crop a little off bottom and / or top
- -
Mike

Pentax K5 / Pentax K5 11/ Pentax K200D / Canon Rebel T1 i / Canon 650D / Pentax MX-1 / Fuji XF1 /Fuji X 10 / Canon EOS-M / Canon G10/ Pentax Mz-7 x 2

Gravelrash

Link Posted 29/05/2014 - 00:08
At least to me the cannisters offer a contrast between the beauty of an old church and the necessity to bang a couple of ugly gas cannisters next to it.

I think there's a rule in photography that suggests odd numbers in an image. If there isn't there should be.
Steve

Sometimes I'm serious and sometimes not, but I consider sarcasm an artform. Which is it today?

Mike_L_76

Link Posted 29/05/2014 - 07:33
Definately the one without the gas bottles

Smeggypants

Link Posted 29/05/2014 - 10:16
Unanswerable and thus meaningless poll. A poll only has meaning if it allows all possible responses.

These two shots do nothing for me in an equal manner so can't answer the poll
[i]Bodies: 1x K-5IIs, 2x K-5, Sony TX-5, Nokia 808
Lenses: Pentax DA 10-17mm ED(IF) Fish Eye, Pentax DA 14mm f/2.8, Sigma 17-70mm f/2.8, Pentax-A 28mm f/2.8, Sigma 30mm F1.4 EX DC, Pentax-A 50mm f/1.2, Pentax-A 50mm f/1.4, Pentax-FA 50mm f/1.4, Pentax-A 50mm f/1.7, Pentax DA* 50-135mm f/2.8, Sigma 135-400mm APO DG, and more ..
Flash: AF-540FGZ, Vivitar 283

bforbes

Link Posted 29/05/2014 - 10:20
I have to agree with Smeggy the answer is not in the pole, it's to move the canisters
Barrie
Too Old To Die Young

http://www.pentaxphotogallery.com/artists/barrieforbes

ChrisA

Link Posted 29/05/2014 - 11:06
bforbes wrote:
I have to agree with Smeggy the answer is not in the pole, it's to move the canisters

It's a drainpipe, not a pole.
.
Pentax K-3, DA18-135, DA35 F2.4, DA17-70, DA55-300, FA28-200, A50 F1.7, A100 F4 Macro, A400 F5.6, Sigma 10-20 EXDC, 50-500 F4.5-6.3 APO DG OS Samsung flash SEF-54PZF(x2)
.

bforbes

Link Posted 29/05/2014 - 11:18
ChrisA wrote:
bforbes wrote:
I have to agree with Smeggy the answer is not in the pole, it's to move the canisters

It's a drainpipe, not a pole.

You have to realise I'm from Sunderland, so use English as a second language.
Barrie
Too Old To Die Young

http://www.pentaxphotogallery.com/artists/barrieforbes

ChrisA

Link Posted 29/05/2014 - 11:19
bforbes wrote:
ChrisA wrote:
Quote:
I have to agree with Smeggy the answer is not in the pole, it's to move the canisters

It's a drainpipe, not a pole.

You have to realise I'm from Sunderland, so use English as a second language.

Fair enough. You're excused
.
Pentax K-3, DA18-135, DA35 F2.4, DA17-70, DA55-300, FA28-200, A50 F1.7, A100 F4 Macro, A400 F5.6, Sigma 10-20 EXDC, 50-500 F4.5-6.3 APO DG OS Samsung flash SEF-54PZF(x2)
.
Add a Comment
You must be registered or logged-in to comment.