Canterbury tombs

womble
Posted 24/06/2012 - 21:27 Link
Various tombs around Canterbury Cathedral. All shot with a Pentax MX, SMC Pentax 'K' 50mm f/1.2 or 135mm f/2.5 (I doubt any were shot using my 28mm f/3.5 lens which was the other lens with me that day) on Fuji Neopan 1600, commercial dev and scan, tweaked in Lightroom 1.4.

Restful

Comment Image


In profile

Comment Image


Hand

Comment Image


Oh my aching head

Comment Image


Aliwal

Comment Image


Newsome Henry

Comment Image


Cherubs

Comment Image


Best wishes, Kris.
Kris Lockyear
It is an illusion that photos are made with the camera… they are made with the eye, heart and head. Henri Cartier-Bresson
Lots of film bodies, a couple of digital ones, too many lenses (mainly older glass) and a Horseman LE 5x4.
Frogherder
Posted 25/06/2012 - 10:19 Link
Fascinating.
I always find it rather humbling to see the skill that carvers of a bygone age achieved.

Is there a significance to Henry Newsome?

regards
Bernard
womble
Posted 25/06/2012 - 11:27 Link
Frogherder wrote:
Is there a significance to Henry Newsome?
Thanks Bernard. No, no significance, just a name a picked from the list.

Cheers, Kris.
Kris Lockyear
It is an illusion that photos are made with the camera… they are made with the eye, heart and head. Henri Cartier-Bresson
Lots of film bodies, a couple of digital ones, too many lenses (mainly older glass) and a Horseman LE 5x4.
Frogfish
Posted 25/06/2012 - 11:32 Link
Interesting set. Though I'd like to have seen some of these in colour (yes I know, it was on film) as often the colours of tombs and graveyards add a dimension. First is the best with that low DoF working perfectly.
http://frogfish.smugmug.com/ Pentax. Pentax DA*300/4, Cosina 55/1.2, Lens Baby Composer Pro & Edge 80, AFA x1.7, Metz 50 af1.
Nikon. D800. D600. Sigma 500/4.5, Nikon 300/2.8 VRII, Sigma 120-300/2.8, Zeiss Distagon ZF2 21/2.8, Zeiss Distagon ZF2 35/2.0, Sigma 50/1.4, Nikkor 85/1.8, Nikon TC20EIII, Nikon TC14EII, Kenko x1.4, Sigma 2.0
Edited by Frogfish: 25/06/2012 - 11:32
womble
Posted 25/06/2012 - 11:41 Link
I'd have to invest in a K5 to take these in colour, I was down to 1/30th wide open at 1600ASA! To be honest, there isn't a great deal of colour in most of them being mainly varieties of white/gray marble.

K.
Kris Lockyear
It is an illusion that photos are made with the camera… they are made with the eye, heart and head. Henri Cartier-Bresson
Lots of film bodies, a couple of digital ones, too many lenses (mainly older glass) and a Horseman LE 5x4.
Gwyn
Posted 25/06/2012 - 12:25 Link
I like them, and this is one occasion where I think black and white works really well. Even the graininess of them adds to them imho.
Very nice set.

I haven't been to Canterbury Cathedral for years. Last time it was overrun with French school kids which didn't add to the experience. Maybe I'll have to go again next time I visit my sister-in-law!
womble
Posted 25/06/2012 - 13:25 Link
Thanks Gwyn. The place was almost empty when I was there but it was close to closing time.

K.
Kris Lockyear
It is an illusion that photos are made with the camera… they are made with the eye, heart and head. Henri Cartier-Bresson
Lots of film bodies, a couple of digital ones, too many lenses (mainly older glass) and a Horseman LE 5x4.
Stuey
Posted 25/06/2012 - 20:20 Link
I like these - thought I had posted a comment earlier
K10D, K5 plus plenty of clueless enthusiasm.

My Flickr site link
Boyo2406
Posted 25/06/2012 - 23:18 Link
I really like Newsome Henry.

I love shooting with my MX, did you scan these yourself?

I have a flatbed scanner and after spending an hour or so scanning each roll I spend at least the same tidying them up and cloning out all the dust and hairs etc do you have to do the same or do you have a better scanning technique?
Digital

K-30, GX-10, DA 16-45, DA 18-55 and DAL 55 - 300

Film

ME Super, 2 x MX, SP 500 and SP F

and lense or 2
womble
Posted 26/06/2012 - 09:40 Link
Boyo2406 wrote:
I really like Newsome Henry.

I love shooting with my MX, did you scan these yourself?

I have a flatbed scanner and after spending an hour or so scanning each roll I spend at least the same tidying them up and cloning out all the dust and hairs etc do you have to do the same or do you have a better scanning technique?
I'm afraid my better scanning technique is to pay "the Darkroom UK" a fiver to do it for me. Only lo-res scans, but very good quality usually. Only if I need a hi res scan do I wheel out my neg scanner and do it myself. As you say, it is pretty slow and then the image usually requires some cleaning up.

Cheers, Kris.
Kris Lockyear
It is an illusion that photos are made with the camera… they are made with the eye, heart and head. Henri Cartier-Bresson
Lots of film bodies, a couple of digital ones, too many lenses (mainly older glass) and a Horseman LE 5x4.

Add Comment

To leave a comment - Log in to Pentax User or create a new account.



Proudly supporting Pentax User

Samsung Logo Asahi Pentax Logo