Bright light HDR

K10D
Posted 09/03/2010 - 11:26 Link
Just playing with HDR. Taken in very bright sunlight with heavy shadow area. Just wondered what would be the result.

Original

Comment Image



Basic HDR version

Comment Image


I am not sure about the increase in saturation and maybe this could be lowered. Processed from three exposures -1, 0 and +1. Original is at 0 comp.

Your thoughts?

Regards
Too far from a shore.
Edited by K10D: 09/03/2010 - 11:26
bwlchmawr
Posted 09/03/2010 - 12:08 Link
Gary this is really nicely handled. Not too much (I'm a bit dubious about HDR), perhaps a little rich in colour.

Could have done with you an hour agao when I was trying to balance the light outside/inside this old building I was photographing!

Regards,

Andrew
Best wishes,

Andrew

"These places mean something and it's the job of a photographer to figure-out what the hell it is."
Robert Adams
"The camera doesn't make a bit of difference.  All of them can record what you are seeing.  But, you have to SEE."
Ernst Hass
My website: http://www.ephotozine.com/user/bwlchmawr-199050
http://s927.photobucket.com/home/ADC3440/index
https://www.flickr.com/photos/78898196@N05
K10D
Posted 09/03/2010 - 12:27 Link
I agree with the "rich in colour" Andrew, but I did want to leave it "as converted" in Photomatix. As a starting point, it shows what can be achieved and then could be re-worked to bring the colours back to normal. This was my first try with the software.

I have another shot lined up which will be a night time image so I will post once its done.

Regards
Too far from a shore.
Edited by K10D: 09/03/2010 - 12:31
Mike-P
Posted 09/03/2010 - 13:49 Link
I have started doing this on a lot of pictures where light is bad and with some manipulation it is very hard to tell the shot is HDR.
andyvarney
Posted 09/03/2010 - 14:31 Link
Are you using the pro or light version?

I was having a look at the light.

Andy
It's not the size of the dog in the fight, but the size of the fight in the dog!
thoughton
Posted 09/03/2010 - 14:57 Link
It's a useful tool when the dynamic range is simply too great. I used it on Sunday for this shot, which hopefully isn't an obvious HDR:

Comment Image
Tim
AF - Pentax K5, Sigma 10-20/4-5.6, Tamron 17-50/2.8, Sigma 30/1.4, Sigma 70-200/2.8, Tamron 70-300/4-5.6
MF - Vivitar CF 28/2.8, Tamron AD2 90/2.5, MTO 1000/11
Stuff - Metz 58 AF1, Cactus v4, Nikon SB24, Raynox 150, Sigma 1.4x TC, Sigma 2x TC, Kenko 2x macro TC, Redsnapper 283 tripod, iMac 27”, Macbook Pro 17”, iPad, iPhone 3G
Flickr • Fluidr • PPG • Street • Portfolio site
Feel free to edit any of my posted photos! If I post a photo for critique, I want brutal honesty. If you don't like it, please say so and tell me why!
K10D
Posted 09/03/2010 - 20:22 Link
Looks good to me Tim. I think HDR has a place in specific situations. I do like the obvious HDR stuff though and have a few favourite Russian colleagues that do some wonderful work. IMO.

I will spend some more time with HDR and would like to use it in the sports area. I have another shoot in two weeks and may do a group of RAW shots to play with HDR. I normally shoot full size JPG.
Too far from a shore.
doingthebobs
Posted 10/03/2010 - 12:07 Link
Electronics have a long way to go before they will beat the human eye. The camera only gets a single instant of light. The eye scans, usually two of them, and forms a picture from a continuous stream of data. The photographer is trying to reproduce that.

Lets face it, the limited dynamic range of digital imaging makes subtle use of HDR techniques necessary to get closer to what the eye will see, for some subjects!
Bob

Add Comment

To leave a comment - Log in to Pentax User or create a new account.



Proudly supporting Pentax User

Samsung Logo Asahi Pentax Logo