Bridge Cameras

Frogfish
Posted 26/06/2011 - 06:04 Link
For many people a Bridge camera gives them exactly what it says, it's a step up from the the P&Ss but doesn't have the 'fear factor' many people exhibit when faced with DSLRs and the steep learning curve (yes, there are auto modes but they don't give the best results).

Pros : are the multitude of scene modes and most still have the 'DSLR' control modes to try if you wish. Huge DoF, excellent macro, incredible zoom range, very good HD video, and sharp. I used to have a Sony HX1 which was an excellent little camera within it's limitations. The mode used most was it's 'Panorama' setting which was great (though low res) and enabled me to get simple no-hassle panoramas. Bridge cameras make great, light, convenient, take anywhere, travel cameras.

Cons : ISO, noise, low light, slow AF, shutter lag, blown highlights, low DR.

If someone is not ready for a DSLR, or maybe doesn't want to go to a changeable lense system, these are great options. To the OP - Definitively look for one with the panorama option !

Incredible zoom range (this is optical not digital)

Comment Image


Comment Image


Comment Image


Comment Image


Simple Panoramas

Comment Image


Comment Image


Comment Image
http://frogfish.smugmug.com/ Pentax. Pentax DA*300/4, Cosina 55/1.2, Lens Baby Composer Pro & Edge 80, AFA x1.7, Metz 50 af1.
Nikon. D800. D600. Sigma 500/4.5, Nikon 300/2.8 VRII, Sigma 120-300/2.8, Zeiss Distagon ZF2 21/2.8, Zeiss Distagon ZF2 35/2.0, Sigma 50/1.4, Nikkor 85/1.8, Nikon TC20EIII, Nikon TC14EII, Kenko x1.4, Sigma 2.0
Edited by Frogfish: 26/06/2011 - 06:07
Don
Posted 26/06/2011 - 12:46 Link
I think Frogfish's photos illustrate exactly what I was saying about a bridge camera being a fine substitute for the huge expensive supertelephoto lens in a travelling d-slr shooters bag..... especially if your vacation has you out on safari/tours during the daytime.
almost any cheap/inexpensive, massive range zoom (bigma for eg) or supertelephoto user is gonna find out these bridge cams can hold thier own quite well.
Fired many shots. Didn't kill anything.
simonkit
Posted 26/06/2011 - 18:50 Link
Don wrote:
I think Frogfish's photos illustrate exactly what I was saying about a bridge camera being a fine substitute for the huge expensive supertelephoto lens in a travelling d-slr shooters bag..... especially if your vacation has you out on safari/tours during the daytime.
almost any cheap/inexpensive, massive range zoom (bigma for eg) or supertelephoto user is gonna find out these bridge cams can hold thier own quite well.
They're certainly capable of producing decent results, do they produce noticeably better results than the new compact "super-zooms" such as the Panasonic TZ10 etc though, the bulk of Bridge cameras in comparison seems to make them much less "user friendly". I think the "bridge" they used to gap is disappearing

Simon
philstaff
Posted 03/07/2011 - 17:14 Link
Thanks for the feed back guys re this subject I have a Tamron 70/300 which is the lens I have used for the last few years at the air show here in Sunderland. However I would realy like something longer to frame the subject closer up in the frame hence the thread.
Regards Ian
johnriley
Posted 03/07/2011 - 17:36 Link
Ian, if that's what you want a bridge camera for then don't. They are far too slow in response time and the planes will be long gone.

Bridge cameras are best for static subjects.
Best regards, John
philstaff
Posted 03/07/2011 - 17:55 Link
Hi John thanks for that I had not relised this to be so you have probably saved me a whole lot of expence. Looks like I will have to dust down the old Tammy once more LOL.
Regards Ian

Add Comment

To leave a comment - Log in to Pentax User or create a new account.



Proudly supporting Pentax User

Samsung Logo Asahi Pentax Logo