Bounce type flashgun
Posted 09/07/2007 - 21:40
Link
WOW there not cheep any recommendation on the eBay front ???
Sorry john i did look but could not find the Flash thread
Sorry john i did look but could not find the Flash thread
Posted 09/07/2007 - 21:44
Link
Yes, Pentax AF540FGZ or AF360FGZ. If you want it to work properly, buy Pentax. There is a Sigma (something like DG500) that has had good reports. Just about any old Pentax fit flash gun will work fine in manual mode, but you need to do more work to get the exposure correct.
Peter E Smith - flickr Photostream
Posted 09/07/2007 - 22:07
Link
Quote:
Yes, Pentax AF540FGZ or AF360FGZ. If you want it to work properly, buy Pentax. There is a Sigma (something like DG500) that has had good reports. Just about any old Pentax fit flash gun will work fine in manual mode, but you need to do more work to get the exposure correct.
Funnily enough, I have had the most consistent results on digital cameras using old auto-sensor flashes like the AF240Z. One was sold on Ebay today for under a tenner.Yes, Pentax AF540FGZ or AF360FGZ. If you want it to work properly, buy Pentax. There is a Sigma (something like DG500) that has had good reports. Just about any old Pentax fit flash gun will work fine in manual mode, but you need to do more work to get the exposure correct.
If budget is an issue, that's a good way to go.
G
Keywords: Charming, polite, and generally agreeable.
Posted 09/07/2007 - 22:16
Link
Quote:
Funnily enough, I have had the most consistent results on digital cameras using old auto-sensor flashes like the AF240Z. One was sold on Ebay today for under a tenner.
I've been experimenting a bit with an old auto-sensor flash - the Braun 320 BVC. It has bounce and swivel, but no zoom. And only one pin on the bottom. Nevertheless, I measured its trigger voltage at only about 8V, so I've gone ahead and used it on the K10DFunnily enough, I have had the most consistent results on digital cameras using old auto-sensor flashes like the AF240Z. One was sold on Ebay today for under a tenner.
I was getting a few underexposed shots until I noticed that if I zoomed the lens out a bit, the exposure was fine.
I came to the tentative conclusion that the angle of view seen by the sensor could, if the lens focal length was too long, be too great, and therefore respond to more reflected light than gets in through the lens.
Is this likely to be right?
Posted 09/07/2007 - 22:57
Link
Chris,
I'd assume that the flash being pre-DSLR, doesn't allow for the FOV crop factor in the way that the newer flashes adjust correctly?
I'd assume that the flash being pre-DSLR, doesn't allow for the FOV crop factor in the way that the newer flashes adjust correctly?
Posted 09/07/2007 - 23:05
Link
Quote:
I'd assume that the flash being pre-DSLR, doesn't allow for the FOV crop factor in the way that the newer flashes adjust correctly?
That's a good point, which I hadn't thought of.I'd assume that the flash being pre-DSLR, doesn't allow for the FOV crop factor in the way that the newer flashes adjust correctly?
But wouldn't it be the case that regardless of the crop factor, a non-zoomable flash head will have a single focal length above which the sensor FOV, being fixed, is greater than the lens's one, assuming that the lens can be zoomed to a long enough focal length?
I guess the focal length at which this happens will be shorter with a DSLR though.
Posted 09/07/2007 - 23:09
Link
Northerndj,
Samsung have versions of the 360 & 540 which are functionally identical (for the GX-x DSLRS) which will work fine on a 'tax and are cheaper.
Chris,
I think you answered your own question
Samsung have versions of the 360 & 540 which are functionally identical (for the GX-x DSLRS) which will work fine on a 'tax and are cheaper.
Chris,
I think you answered your own question
Posted 09/07/2007 - 23:13
Link
Quote:
I think you answered your own question
Absolutely. Most of what goes on inside my head makes perfect sense.I think you answered your own question
Till it comes out, that is, hence the thinking aloud...
Hey, just because you're paranoid doesn't mean they're not out to get you
Posted 09/07/2007 - 23:16
Link
Quote:
Hey, just because you're paranoid doesn't mean they're not out to get you
Which is why I live in a shell
Hey, just because you're paranoid doesn't mean they're not out to get you
Posted 09/07/2007 - 23:24
Link
Quote:
I was getting a few underexposed shots until I noticed that if I zoomed the lens out a bit, the exposure was fine.
I came to the tentative conclusion that the angle of view seen by the sensor could, if the lens focal length was too long, be too great, and therefore respond to more reflected light than gets in through the lens.
Is this likely to be right?
No.George Lazarette wrote:
Funnily enough, I have had the most consistent results on digital cameras using old auto-sensor flashes like the AF240Z. One was sold on Ebay today for under a tenner.
I've been experimenting a bit with an old auto-sensor flash - the Braun 320 BVC. It has bounce and swivel, but no zoom. And only one pin on the bottom. Nevertheless, I measured its trigger voltage at only about 8V, so I've gone ahead and used it on the K10DFunnily enough, I have had the most consistent results on digital cameras using old auto-sensor flashes like the AF240Z. One was sold on Ebay today for under a tenner.
I was getting a few underexposed shots until I noticed that if I zoomed the lens out a bit, the exposure was fine.
I came to the tentative conclusion that the angle of view seen by the sensor could, if the lens focal length was too long, be too great, and therefore respond to more reflected light than gets in through the lens.
Is this likely to be right?
G
Keywords: Charming, polite, and generally agreeable.
Posted 09/07/2007 - 23:27
Link
Quote:
Please elaborate
I wrote:
I came to the tentative conclusion that the angle of view seen by the sensor could, if the lens focal length was too long, be too great, and therefore respond to more reflected light than gets in through the lens.
Is this likely to be right?
No.I came to the tentative conclusion that the angle of view seen by the sensor could, if the lens focal length was too long, be too great, and therefore respond to more reflected light than gets in through the lens.
Is this likely to be right?
Posted 10/07/2007 - 08:18
Link
Quote:
The sensor is a light meter, and it measures the light, then cuts off the power to the flash. The focal length of the lens and the size of the camera sensor are immaterial.G wrote:
Please elaborate Quote:
I came to the tentative conclusion that the angle of view seen by the sensor could, if the lens focal length was too long, be too great, and therefore respond to more reflected light than gets in through the lens.
Is this likely to be right?
No.I came to the tentative conclusion that the angle of view seen by the sensor could, if the lens focal length was too long, be too great, and therefore respond to more reflected light than gets in through the lens.
Is this likely to be right?
G
Keywords: Charming, polite, and generally agreeable.
Add Comment
To leave a comment - Log in to Pentax User or create a new account.


48 posts
19 years