Backwards Zoom Lenses?
For example, most front elements are convex, but a few are concave. I concur that the 16-45mm is an excellent lens.
I'm sure it's a consideration that comes quite a long way down the list of priorities in lens design, in fact probably so far down it's not even on the page.
.
Pentax:K5ii, K7, K100D, DA18-55, DA10-17, DA55-300, DA50-200, F100-300, F50, DA35 AL, 4* M50, 2* M135, Helicoid extension, Tak 300 f4 (& 6 film bodies)
3rd Party: Bigmos (Sigma 150-500mm OS HSM),2* 28mm, 100mm macro, 28-200 zoom, 35-80 zoom, 80-200 zoom, 80-210 zoom, 300mm M42, 600 mirror, 1000-4000 scope, 50mm M42, enlarger lenses, Sony & micro 4/3 cameras with various PK mounts, Zenit E...
Far to many tele-converters, adapters, project parts & extension tubes etc.
.[size=11:].Flickr• WPF• Panoramio
I remember being surprised to find that, while the lens lengthens when focusing closer to the subject, the rear element of the DA 35mm limited stays in the same place always and doesn't move with the rest of the lens elements.
Fan of DA limited and old manual lenses
--
Pentax K-1 + K-5 and some other stuff
Algi
Add Comment
To leave a comment - Log in to Pentax User or create a new account.
2536 posts
16 years
South Dorset
- How backwards zooming works optically.
- Why Pentax (or other designer) would use a backwards design for a zoom lenses.
- Whether there any other fairly common zoom lenses that are backwards.
- Whether the DA 16-45mm and Q-02 are related optically.
Steve