Anywhere i can upload Raw File to?
Posted 15/05/2009 - 11:52
Link
Free file hosting service: http://www.savefile.com/
ISO 1600 is very high. You're always going to get lots of noise with that.
ISO 1600 is very high. You're always going to get lots of noise with that.
~Pete
Posted 15/05/2009 - 11:57
Link
This is a very simple and fast file host, no-nonsense, no-adds,
no registration, no charges.
http://upload-drive.com/
You can't delete files from there, they will eventually
be deleted when the HD's are full. You could post a
password protected zip if your bothered about that.
shim
no registration, no charges.
http://upload-drive.com/
You can't delete files from there, they will eventually
be deleted when the HD's are full. You could post a
password protected zip if your bothered about that.
shim
Posted 15/05/2009 - 11:58
Link
Pete beat me to it
shim
shim
Posted 15/05/2009 - 12:16
Link
Posted 15/05/2009 - 12:55
Link
That's a good shot! I would be pleased with that under the circumstances.
If you want lower noise then you need a brighter day to enable a lower ISO setting. It will also help to get closer to the subject (or use an even longer lens) so you don't have to crop so much.
It's fairly sharp as well. For even sharper, maybe a steadier tripod would help, and/or an even faster shutter speed.
If you want lower noise then you need a brighter day to enable a lower ISO setting. It will also help to get closer to the subject (or use an even longer lens) so you don't have to crop so much.
It's fairly sharp as well. For even sharper, maybe a steadier tripod would help, and/or an even faster shutter speed.
~Pete
Posted 15/05/2009 - 12:59
Link
ps. I think you're making the mistake of expecting images to look perfect when viewed at 100%. That's expecting too much. The only problems are the not-bright-enough light and the subject being too small for the lens at that distance.
pps. Check out Silkypix Developer Studio for excellent RAW processing. It enables good compromise between sharpness and noise reduction. Silky by name, silky by nature.
pps. Check out Silkypix Developer Studio for excellent RAW processing. It enables good compromise between sharpness and noise reduction. Silky by name, silky by nature.
~Pete
Posted 15/05/2009 - 13:13
Link
Quick look - pretty excellent considering the conditions!
My initial thoughts:
1. High ISO has produced some noise. But I know Silkypix will do a good job of it.
2. There's limited DoF. You may want to do a focus check and adjust
3. Could be some motion blur in the bird. At 400mm and 1/400s it's likely that any movement in the bird will produce blur - my evidence is that the body features seem sharper than the head.
I'll run it through Silkypix/LR/PS and see what pops out...
Matt
My initial thoughts:
1. High ISO has produced some noise. But I know Silkypix will do a good job of it.
2. There's limited DoF. You may want to do a focus check and adjust
3. Could be some motion blur in the bird. At 400mm and 1/400s it's likely that any movement in the bird will produce blur - my evidence is that the body features seem sharper than the head.
I'll run it through Silkypix/LR/PS and see what pops out...
Matt
http://www.mattmatic.co.uk
(For gallery, tips and links)
(For gallery, tips and links)
Posted 15/05/2009 - 13:15
Link
WOW big file, straight out of the camera right?
The camera hardly compress DNG file so it's better to use Adobe DNG converter and let the computer do it, it's now a 14mb file and compare to 24mb that's quite a lot.
Also the camera compress PEF more so if you need to shoot a lot use that so that you can put more shots on a card and then convert them into DNG.
BUSY NOW
For ISO1600 it looks like a good photo though, you don't want to compare it with the K10D
Have done some things in lightroom, set the white balance coorrect and the exposure. It's now busy in photoshop removing the noise........ takes a long time....
Just doing some simple things now...
So finished
Not my best but you get an idea.
[IMG]http://i282.photobucket.com/albums/kk244/Anvh/IMGP0896.jpg[/IMG]
1:1 pixel (I find it a better name then 100% zoom/crop)
[IMG]http://i282.photobucket.com/albums/kk244/Anvh/Untitled-1-7.jpg[/IMG]
The camera hardly compress DNG file so it's better to use Adobe DNG converter and let the computer do it, it's now a 14mb file and compare to 24mb that's quite a lot.
Also the camera compress PEF more so if you need to shoot a lot use that so that you can put more shots on a card and then convert them into DNG.
BUSY NOW
For ISO1600 it looks like a good photo though, you don't want to compare it with the K10D
Have done some things in lightroom, set the white balance coorrect and the exposure. It's now busy in photoshop removing the noise........ takes a long time....
Just doing some simple things now...
So finished
Not my best but you get an idea.
[IMG]http://i282.photobucket.com/albums/kk244/Anvh/IMGP0896.jpg[/IMG]
1:1 pixel (I find it a better name then 100% zoom/crop)
[IMG]http://i282.photobucket.com/albums/kk244/Anvh/Untitled-1-7.jpg[/IMG]
Posted 15/05/2009 - 13:26
Link
i think the noise levels are good, hope you dont mind just a quicky,
[IMG]http://i727.photobucket.com/albums/ww272/scottthehat/IMGP0896lpg.jpg[/IMG]
[IMG]http://i727.photobucket.com/albums/ww272/scottthehat/IMGP0896lpgc.jpg[/IMG]
[IMG]http://i727.photobucket.com/albums/ww272/scottthehat/IMGP0896lpg.jpg[/IMG]
[IMG]http://i727.photobucket.com/albums/ww272/scottthehat/IMGP0896lpgc.jpg[/IMG]
just keep snapping,
https://pentaxphotogallery.com/scottbenson
http://s727.photobucket.com/albums/ww272/scottthehat/
CAMERAS = k200d + battery grip.
nikon d300 + battery grip.
LENSES = tamron aspherical DII 18-200mm f3.5/6.3,
nikon 18-200mm afs vr f3.5/5.6 g dx
sigma 150-500mm apo dg hsm os
sigma 170-500mm apo dg
FLASH = samsung sef36pzf flash + more.
https://pentaxphotogallery.com/scottbenson
http://s727.photobucket.com/albums/ww272/scottthehat/
CAMERAS = k200d + battery grip.
nikon d300 + battery grip.
LENSES = tamron aspherical DII 18-200mm f3.5/6.3,
nikon 18-200mm afs vr f3.5/5.6 g dx
sigma 150-500mm apo dg hsm os
sigma 170-500mm apo dg
FLASH = samsung sef36pzf flash + more.
Posted 15/05/2009 - 13:28
Link
also to me the peanuts behind are sharper, maybe a focus adjustment is needed,
just keep snapping,
https://pentaxphotogallery.com/scottbenson
http://s727.photobucket.com/albums/ww272/scottthehat/
CAMERAS = k200d + battery grip.
nikon d300 + battery grip.
LENSES = tamron aspherical DII 18-200mm f3.5/6.3,
nikon 18-200mm afs vr f3.5/5.6 g dx
sigma 150-500mm apo dg hsm os
sigma 170-500mm apo dg
FLASH = samsung sef36pzf flash + more.
https://pentaxphotogallery.com/scottbenson
http://s727.photobucket.com/albums/ww272/scottthehat/
CAMERAS = k200d + battery grip.
nikon d300 + battery grip.
LENSES = tamron aspherical DII 18-200mm f3.5/6.3,
nikon 18-200mm afs vr f3.5/5.6 g dx
sigma 150-500mm apo dg hsm os
sigma 170-500mm apo dg
FLASH = samsung sef36pzf flash + more.
Posted 15/05/2009 - 17:21
Link
@ Scott - What PP did you use m8?
Also i have to agree with you both on the Focus. I thought it was just me but i have noticed it in a few pictures.
Also i have to agree with you both on the Focus. I thought it was just me but i have noticed it in a few pictures.
Posted 15/05/2009 - 17:37
Link
to be honest i all i did was use the pentax software and saved it as a jpeg and then used ps elements,
just keep snapping,
https://pentaxphotogallery.com/scottbenson
http://s727.photobucket.com/albums/ww272/scottthehat/
CAMERAS = k200d + battery grip.
nikon d300 + battery grip.
LENSES = tamron aspherical DII 18-200mm f3.5/6.3,
nikon 18-200mm afs vr f3.5/5.6 g dx
sigma 150-500mm apo dg hsm os
sigma 170-500mm apo dg
FLASH = samsung sef36pzf flash + more.
https://pentaxphotogallery.com/scottbenson
http://s727.photobucket.com/albums/ww272/scottthehat/
CAMERAS = k200d + battery grip.
nikon d300 + battery grip.
LENSES = tamron aspherical DII 18-200mm f3.5/6.3,
nikon 18-200mm afs vr f3.5/5.6 g dx
sigma 150-500mm apo dg hsm os
sigma 170-500mm apo dg
FLASH = samsung sef36pzf flash + more.
Add Comment
To leave a comment - Log in to Pentax User or create a new account.



211 posts
17 years
Lanarkshire,
Scotland
Was shooting at 1600 iso, +0.7 ev with the Sigma 120-400mm @ 400mm.
Personally i think they all look god awful but im no expert at that focal range so i was hoping to upload a Raw DNG to somewhere so some of you guys can give me advice.
To me it seems my pictures are getting softer by the shot and the picture quality is degrading by the shot.
In all honesty there is no reason why it should look as bad as it does.
Tripod, SR OFF, extremely calm if a little overcast but nothing out the ordinary.
On a side note i looked at the LCD and my first thoughts when i zoomed them on the LCD were. "wow that should be a topper".