Another good review for the K-3
Posted 24/11/2013 - 12:26
Link
Although this review is quite short, it is also very interesting. There are some notable omissions, for example it mentions nothing about noise levels or high ISO performance, but the most interesting part is that the reviewer rates the AF performance very highly, including the tracking capability. For someone used to using high end DSLR's from the main brands that's very encouraging. I can't comment on the tracking performance or the comparative speed against Canon or Nikon bodies, but it is obvious after using the K-3 for a couple of weeks that the AF is faster than previous bodies (especially with screw drive lenses) and it is very accurate.
Regards
David
Regards
David
Posted 24/11/2013 - 15:22
Link
Note to myself - must stop reading K-3 reviews.
Regards, Tom
K-1ii,K-3iii's.
SMC PENTAX-F 1:2.8 28mm, HD Pentax-D FA* 1:1.4 50mm SDM AW,
SMC PENTAX-D FA MACRO 1:2.8 100mm WR,
SMC PENTAX-DA* 1:4 300mm ED [IF] SDM,
SMC PENTAX-FA* 1:4 600mm IF & ED,
HD PENTAX -DA 1.4x AW AF REAR CONVERTER,
Pentax Photo Gallery
K-1ii,K-3iii's.
SMC PENTAX-F 1:2.8 28mm, HD Pentax-D FA* 1:1.4 50mm SDM AW,
SMC PENTAX-D FA MACRO 1:2.8 100mm WR,
SMC PENTAX-DA* 1:4 300mm ED [IF] SDM,
SMC PENTAX-FA* 1:4 600mm IF & ED,
HD PENTAX -DA 1.4x AW AF REAR CONVERTER,
Pentax Photo Gallery
Posted 24/11/2013 - 15:31
Link
There's not a lot not to like about the K-3. There do seem to be some differing opinions about the AF though. I agree with this one that it's fast, but AP seem to think it's not slow but not that fast. However, they were trying it with generally slower lenses.
I think also it may well depend on the settings used. We can choose focus priority or release priority and I would always use centre point only. Others will have their own preferences.
I think also it may well depend on the settings used. We can choose focus priority or release priority and I would always use centre point only. Others will have their own preferences.
Best regards, John
Posted 24/11/2013 - 16:21
Link
Your not making it any easier John.
Regards, Tom
K-1ii,K-3iii's.
SMC PENTAX-F 1:2.8 28mm, HD Pentax-D FA* 1:1.4 50mm SDM AW,
SMC PENTAX-D FA MACRO 1:2.8 100mm WR,
SMC PENTAX-DA* 1:4 300mm ED [IF] SDM,
SMC PENTAX-FA* 1:4 600mm IF & ED,
HD PENTAX -DA 1.4x AW AF REAR CONVERTER,
Pentax Photo Gallery
K-1ii,K-3iii's.
SMC PENTAX-F 1:2.8 28mm, HD Pentax-D FA* 1:1.4 50mm SDM AW,
SMC PENTAX-D FA MACRO 1:2.8 100mm WR,
SMC PENTAX-DA* 1:4 300mm ED [IF] SDM,
SMC PENTAX-FA* 1:4 600mm IF & ED,
HD PENTAX -DA 1.4x AW AF REAR CONVERTER,
Pentax Photo Gallery
Posted 24/11/2013 - 16:23
Link
For me Tom, the only problem is justifying the £2000 it will cost for two of them, his and hers.
If we do a wedding, we can't have two different levels of definition in the images depending upon who shot what. They have to be the same.
If we do a wedding, we can't have two different levels of definition in the images depending upon who shot what. They have to be the same.
Best regards, John
Posted 24/11/2013 - 16:43
Link
johnriley wrote:
For me Tom, the only problem is justifying the £2000 it will cost for two of them, his and hers.
If we do a wedding, we can't have two different levels of definition in the images depending upon who shot what. They have to be the same.
"business expenses..."
For me Tom, the only problem is justifying the £2000 it will cost for two of them, his and hers.
If we do a wedding, we can't have two different levels of definition in the images depending upon who shot what. They have to be the same.
David
Posted 24/11/2013 - 16:50
Link
More to help push you all...
http://www.markcassino.com/b2evolution/index.php/Pentax-K-3/
http://photographicwanderings.com/2013/11/18/pentax-k-3-review-its-good-buy-it-u...
http://www.markcassino.com/b2evolution/index.php/Pentax-K-3/
http://photographicwanderings.com/2013/11/18/pentax-k-3-review-its-good-buy-it-u...
Cheers Jules...
My viewfinder is 576,000,000 pixels.
My other viewfinder is 5.76,000,000.
www.exaggeratedperspectives.com
My viewfinder is 576,000,000 pixels.
My other viewfinder is 5.76,000,000.
www.exaggeratedperspectives.com
Posted 24/11/2013 - 18:47
Link
johnriley wrote:
For me Tom, the only problem is justifying the £2000 it will cost for two of them, his and hers.
If we do a wedding, we can't have two different levels of definition in the images depending upon who shot what. They have to be the same.
---------------------------------------------------------------------For me Tom, the only problem is justifying the £2000 it will cost for two of them, his and hers.
If we do a wedding, we can't have two different levels of definition in the images depending upon who shot what. They have to be the same.
Believe me - they won't notice! When I think of some of the very average wedding photos I've seen the families drool over I wouldn't lose any sleep over it
Posted 24/11/2013 - 19:05
Link
johnriley wrote:
For me Tom, the only problem is justifying the £2000 it will cost for two of them, his and hers.
If we do a wedding, we can't have two different levels of definition in the images depending upon who shot what. They have to be the same.
---------------------------------------------------------------------For me Tom, the only problem is justifying the £2000 it will cost for two of them, his and hers.
If we do a wedding, we can't have two different levels of definition in the images depending upon who shot what. They have to be the same.
Believe me - they won't notice! When I think of some of the very average wedding photos I've seen the families drool over I wouldn't lose any sleep over it
jules wrote:
More to help push you all...
http://www.markcassino.com/b2evolution/index.php/Pentax-K-3/
http://photographicwanderings.com/2013/11/18/pentax-k-3-review-its-good-buy-it-u...
-------------------------------------------More to help push you all...
http://www.markcassino.com/b2evolution/index.php/Pentax-K-3/
http://photographicwanderings.com/2013/11/18/pentax-k-3-review-its-good-buy-it-u...
John will like this quote from the second review and I agree!
"Life is too short to start looking for moiré."
Posted 24/11/2013 - 21:44
Link
I can feel that very much dcweather, I spent quite long enough looking for moire!
Best regards, John
Posted 25/11/2013 - 01:06
Link
Bear in mind this review (the B&H Photo one) is on a camera shop's website. I doubt they'd be putting up one that said "The AF is a bit disappointing", it's hardly going to help sell the camera.
Anyway, is it just me, or are the first few photos on there suffering from a huge amount of colour fringing?
Dan
Anyway, is it just me, or are the first few photos on there suffering from a huge amount of colour fringing?
Dan
K-3, a macro lens and a DA*300mm...
Add Comment
To leave a comment - Log in to Pentax User or create a new account.


1714 posts
16 years
Somewhere warm and sunny
I particularly like the AF comments.
Review
"Life is what happens to you while you're busy making other plans" (John Lennon)