Andromeda

SteveEveritt
Posted 03/09/2016 - 15:53 Link
and another cheeky Milky Way shot

Comment Image


Andromeda and another galaxy above it with the sexy name M32. This is a 30 second single exposure using a DA*300 on my K-5iis at f5.6 ISO 800 and it's uncropped
Comment Image
Flickr
"Life is what happens to you while you're busy making other plans" (John Lennon)
gtis
Posted 03/09/2016 - 18:46 Link
Hi
The first one is excellent
cheers Neil
pentax k3
DA* 300 f4 DA* 50-135 f 2.8 smc DA* 16-50 f2.8 50mm f1.7 pentax1.4xhd converter





Panasonic Dmc Fz200
jemx99
Posted 03/09/2016 - 18:55 Link
Wow! 2 great shots, the one of Andromeda is superb!
McGregNi
Posted 03/09/2016 - 19:21 Link
Just like the opening scene of a movie set in deep space! Nice work Steve
My Guides to the Pentax Digital Camera Flash Lighting System : Download here from the PentaxForums Homepage Article .... link
Pentax K7 with BG-4 Grip / Samyang 14mm f2.8 ED AS IF UMC / DA18-55mm f3.5-5.6 AL WR / SMC A28mm f2.8 / D FA 28-105mm / SMC F35-70 f3.5-4.5 / SMC A50mm f1.7 / Tamron AF70-300mm f4-5.6 Di LD macro / SMC M75-150mm f4.0 / Tamron Adaptall (CT-135) 135mm f2.8 / Asahi Takumar-A 2X tele-converter / Pentax AF-540FGZ (I & II) Flashes / Cactus RF60/X Flashes & V6/V6II Transceiver
K10D
Posted 03/09/2016 - 19:29 Link
Impressive images Steve. Well photographed.

Best regards
Too far from a shore.
SteveEveritt
Posted 03/09/2016 - 21:26 Link
Cheers for the positive comments guys
Flickr
"Life is what happens to you while you're busy making other plans" (John Lennon)
alfpics
Posted 03/09/2016 - 22:35 Link
Great stuff - how come you kept the stars as dots with a 300mm lens on and 30secs? Did you use the OGPS thing?
Andy
scarr1
Posted 04/09/2016 - 00:44 Link
I love these....Is the Andromeda one really uncropped? Not through a telescope?
I cant even see andromeda without a telescope.
What lens did you use for the milky way shot?
scarr1
Posted 04/09/2016 - 00:53 Link
Ive had a look on your flikr link, and the others are stunning as well. The andromeda with the 50-135....you can really see the spirals of the galaxy in that one.
Brilliant.
davidwozhere
Posted 04/09/2016 - 00:56 Link
I thought 30 seconds was the maximum you could get away with WITHOUT the stars growing tails?
Whatever, they are impressive
Both the *istDS and the K5 are incurably addicted to old glass

My page on Photocrowd
petrochemist
Posted 04/09/2016 - 12:56 Link
davidwozhere wrote:
I thought 30 seconds was the maximum you could get away with WITHOUT the stars growing tails?
Whatever, they are impressive
For fixed cameras the maximum with out trails is highly dependent on the focal length (the '500 rule' gives a rough idea of this - a 300mm lens on APSC it works out about 1 second).
The brilliant shot of Andromeda with a long lens must have been taken with a tracking mount as this is well outside the limit for trails at 450mm EFL. I suspect the movement needed is beyond the range of astrotracker (O-GPS). If not it's even more impressive than I thought!
Taken as single shots they must also have needed some real good dark skies!
Mike
.
Pentax:K5ii, K7, K100D, DA18-55, DA10-17, DA55-300, DA50-200, F100-300, F50, DA35 AL, 4* M50, 2* M135, Helicoid extension, Tak 300 f4 (& 6 film bodies)
3rd Party: Bigmos (Sigma 150-500mm OS HSM),2* 28mm, 100mm macro, 28-200 zoom, 35-80 zoom, 80-200 zoom, 80-210 zoom, 300mm M42, 600 mirror, 1000-4000 scope, 50mm M42, enlarger lenses, Sony & micro 4/3 cameras with various PK mounts, Zenit E...
Far to many tele-converters, adapters, project parts & extension tubes etc.

.[size=11:].Flickr• WPF• Panoramio
SteveEveritt
Posted 06/09/2016 - 21:34 Link
All done without the use of a tracking mount the Astrotracer really is that good. I started with the DA*50-135 to get Andromeda in the centre of the frame and then zoomed to 135 and again made sure it was central. Then popped on the DA*300 and took the 30 second exposure, initially when you look at the picture on the back of the screen it is only an orange fuzz but once you let Lightroom at it the full ellipse appears.
The uncropped shot really is uncropped and a single exposure. I did try to do a 10 second shot with the 1.4x TC on but I couldn't see Andromeda in that one because I'd moved the angle of the lens, couldn't find it again and as it was quite late and I had work the following morning and a 1.5 hour drive home I left it for another night.
But when I got the shot home and put it through LR I had only just missed it, there was a large fuzzy lump on the far right of the image so if I'd taken with a much higher ISO I might have seen it and been able to adjust accordingly, Lessons learnt
Oh yes, one more thing. You can actually focus on a bright star with the Pentax K-5iis and K-3 through both lenses mentioned, it's incredible

Oh, just remembered, the Milky Way shot was with an old Pentax A 28mm f2.8. It has the old ability to turn it to infinity and it's at infinity, why aren't modern lenses like that
Flickr
"Life is what happens to you while you're busy making other plans" (John Lennon)
Edited by SteveEveritt: 06/09/2016 - 21:43
alfpics
Posted 06/09/2016 - 22:06 Link
Highly impressed!
Andy
scarr1
Posted 07/09/2016 - 00:37 Link
Thanks for the extended info Steve, much appreciated.
I started a thread a couple of weeks ago regarding a suitable lens for milky way shots, and asked if the A 28mm 2.8 would be a good choice (i sold the one i had as i wasnt seeing much use), i now think i need to get one again.
gtis
Posted 07/09/2016 - 20:40 Link
Well impressed 1 1/2 hours drive to a dark site i go out to a dark site with my
Telescope with some friends
I must try taking the camera and some lenes and have a go I have also a tracking mount
cheers Neil
pentax k3
DA* 300 f4 DA* 50-135 f 2.8 smc DA* 16-50 f2.8 50mm f1.7 pentax1.4xhd converter





Panasonic Dmc Fz200

Add Comment

To leave a comment - Log in to Pentax User or create a new account.



Proudly supporting Pentax User

Samsung Logo Asahi Pentax Logo