Analogue Northern Lights
Posted 17/05/2012 - 13:36
Link
Great shots, but I couldn't help but notice that the white specks in each photo are in the same place. Is this perhaps a sign of dust/impurities on your lens?
Posted 17/05/2012 - 13:53
Link
Another lovely set Bjørn!
I think the specks Steven is referring to are the ones in the water. They don't seem to be reflections but maybe they are. One slightly up and to the right of the jetty is particularly noticeable.
I think the specks Steven is referring to are the ones in the water. They don't seem to be reflections but maybe they are. One slightly up and to the right of the jetty is particularly noticeable.
Posted 17/05/2012 - 13:56
Link
bjolester wrote:
What made me suspect something "untoward" was that some of the less-bright stars were still visible through the Aurora. I'd have thought that the Northern Lights would have scattered the light they were emitting, or been more powerful, so as to "eliminate" their luminance altogether.
steven9761 wrote:
Great shots, but I couldn't help but notice that the white specks in each photo are in the same place. Is this perhaps a sign of dust/impurities on your lens?
Thank you! On my monitor all the white spots are identifiable as stars.Great shots, but I couldn't help but notice that the white specks in each photo are in the same place. Is this perhaps a sign of dust/impurities on your lens?
Posted 17/05/2012 - 13:59
Link
Gwyn wrote:
Another lovely set Bjørn!
I think the specks Steven is referring to are the ones in the water. They don't seem to be reflections but maybe they are. One slightly up and to the right of the jetty is particularly noticeable.
Oh - I see! The small red and green coloured dots in the water are floaters, possibly for fishing nets or crab catching boxes. I can count four on the left hand side and two on the right hand side in the water.Another lovely set Bjørn!
I think the specks Steven is referring to are the ones in the water. They don't seem to be reflections but maybe they are. One slightly up and to the right of the jetty is particularly noticeable.
And thank you Gwyn for your comment!
Posted 17/05/2012 - 14:14
Link
Ah that explains those then Bjørn. Thanks. I hope you have some of these fabulous photos hung on a wall at home?
Only another four months or so until you can try again .
Enjoy your summer!
Only another four months or so until you can try again .
Enjoy your summer!
Posted 17/05/2012 - 14:15
Link
steven9761 wrote:
Great shots, but I couldn't help but notice that the white specks in each photo are in the same place. Is this perhaps a sign of dust/impurities on your lens?
I thought you meant the stars at first too! I suspect they're caused by dust on the diffuser in the scanner or on the slide holder.Great shots, but I couldn't help but notice that the white specks in each photo are in the same place. Is this perhaps a sign of dust/impurities on your lens?
John
John K
Posted 17/05/2012 - 14:39
Link
JAK wrote:
John
I have scanned these slides on my Minolta Dimage Scan Elite 5400 in 16bit, 16x multipass and with ICE noise removal. Afterwards I checked these five images thoroughly with regards to scratches and other contaminants, but since I could not find anything I have not done any spot removal or cloning. It is also quite difficult to tell whether minute circular white spots are stars or dust That being said, I do not have the best monitor in the world (15" Mac Powerbook:lol, so I think I need to check these images again on a larger and better monitor. Thank you for pointing this out to me!steven9761 wrote:
Great shots, but I couldn't help but notice that the white specks in each photo are in the same place. Is this perhaps a sign of dust/impurities on your lens?
I thought you meant the stars at first too! I suspect they're caused by dust on the diffuser in the scanner or on the slide holder.Great shots, but I couldn't help but notice that the white specks in each photo are in the same place. Is this perhaps a sign of dust/impurities on your lens?
John
BTW: Here is a close-up of one area that could possibly could contain dust or noise:
[IMG]http://i812.photobucket.com/albums/zz50/bjolester/250412_30_MAGNIFY.jpg[/IMG]
Posted 17/05/2012 - 14:45
Link
Gwyn wrote:
Ah that explains those then Bjørn. Thanks. I hope you have some of these fabulous photos hung on a wall at home?
Only another four months or so until you can try again .
Enjoy your summer!
My plan is to take some of these five images to the photo lab and have them printed in A3 or A2, and hang them on the wall. I have not printed any of my N.L. photos yet, so I am looking forward to having them printed, especially these with film grain.Ah that explains those then Bjørn. Thanks. I hope you have some of these fabulous photos hung on a wall at home?
Only another four months or so until you can try again .
Enjoy your summer!
I wish you also a nice summer Gwyn
Posted 17/05/2012 - 19:43
Link
It's the spots in the water that look odd as they don't seem to mirror anything in the sky above.
I presumed that larger blob was the moon!
John
I presumed that larger blob was the moon!
John
John K
Posted 17/05/2012 - 19:50
Link
JAK wrote:
It's the spots in the water that look odd as they don't seem to mirror anything in the sky above.
I presumed that larger blob was the moon!
John
It's the spots in the water that look odd as they don't seem to mirror anything in the sky above.
I presumed that larger blob was the moon!
John
bjolester wrote:
The strong light source that also reflects on the water is the planet Venus.
Gwyn wrote:
I think the specks Steven is referring to are the ones in the water. They don't seem to be reflections but maybe they are. One slightly up and to the right of the jetty is particularly noticeable.
Oh - I see! The small red and green coloured dots in the water are floaters, possibly for fishing nets or crab catching boxes. I can count four on the left hand side and two on the right hand side in the water.!I think the specks Steven is referring to are the ones in the water. They don't seem to be reflections but maybe they are. One slightly up and to the right of the jetty is particularly noticeable.
Posted 19/05/2012 - 21:13
Link
Very nice pictures. I would like that hanging on my wall!
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
John's Law: If it isn't broke, it bloody soon will be.
John's Law: If it isn't broke, it bloody soon will be.
Posted 20/05/2012 - 18:53
Link
Some lovely shots there. What sort of exposure time did you need?
I'd be very pleased to have taken these and would get some printed up too!
K.
I'd be very pleased to have taken these and would get some printed up too!
K.
Kris Lockyear
It is an illusion that photos are made with the camera… they are made with the eye, heart and head. Henri Cartier-Bresson
Lots of film bodies, a couple of digital ones, too many lenses (mainly older glass) and a Horseman LE 5x4.
It is an illusion that photos are made with the camera… they are made with the eye, heart and head. Henri Cartier-Bresson
Lots of film bodies, a couple of digital ones, too many lenses (mainly older glass) and a Horseman LE 5x4.
Add Comment
To leave a comment - Log in to Pentax User or create a new account.


981 posts
16 years
Trondheim,
Norway
https://www.pentaxuser.com/forum/topic/even-more-northern-lights-34747
The major difference being that these were shot with my Pentax MX and Fuji Provia 400X. I used the same lens, FA*24mm f2.0, on both my K20D in my other post and here with the MX. In 35mm film format the 24mm is wide enough to catch much more of the Lights, which was important because I do not have a decent wide angle lens for my DSLR. I find the FA* 24mm quite superb at capturing nuances in demanding light conditions like the N.L. C & C is welcome!
1.
NORDLYS_29 by bjolester, on Flickr
2.
NORDLYS_28 by bjolester, on Flickr
3.
NORDLYS_27 by bjolester, on Flickr
4.
NORDLYS_26 by bjolester, on Flickr
5.
NORDLYS_25 by bjolester, on Flickr
PPG
Flickr