A very British scene

RalphHardwick
Posted 23/02/2014 - 09:57 Link
I went to the Indoor 4X4 Show at Donington Park last weekend and, as I was driving out, I saw this view and just had to park up, trudge and slide across the soggy field and capture it.
Comment Image

K5ii(s) + DA*16-50
---------------------------------------------------------------------
CaptureLight Ltd
flickr
"I carry a camera to capture memories and the occasional photograph worthy of sharing"
Gravelrash
Posted 23/02/2014 - 10:33 Link
whether you wanted the Land Rover in the picture or not, I think the image is beyond the tyre tracks. They spoil the picture for me. Although it would take more than a little devotion to walk past that mud in the wrong shoes
Steve

Sometimes I'm serious and sometimes not, but I consider sarcasm an artform. Which is it today?
McGregNi
Posted 23/02/2014 - 11:42 Link
Its a challenging one there Ralph, exposure wise. Unfortunately you've lost the battle I think, the strong backlighting has washed out the sky and background (did you de-saturate there?) - the sky's gone really. It could only be done with ND grads or multiple exposures I feel.
My Guides to the Pentax Digital Camera Flash Lighting System : Download here from the PentaxForums Homepage Article .... link
Pentax K7 with BG-4 Grip / Samyang 14mm f2.8 ED AS IF UMC / DA18-55mm f3.5-5.6 AL WR / SMC A28mm f2.8 / D FA 28-105mm / SMC F35-70 f3.5-4.5 / SMC A50mm f1.7 / Tamron AF70-300mm f4-5.6 Di LD macro / SMC M75-150mm f4.0 / Tamron Adaptall (CT-135) 135mm f2.8 / Asahi Takumar-A 2X tele-converter / Pentax AF-540FGZ (I & II) Flashes / Cactus RF60/X Flashes & V6/V6II Transceiver
davidstorm
Posted 23/02/2014 - 18:05 Link
My feeling on this one is similar to Nigel's - it looks over-exposed. I wasn't there at the time so clearly can't say exactly what the conditions were, but the K-5iis has so much latitude that I think you could have exposed for the sky and recovered the shadow details in post processing. In terms of composition, I would prefer it with a far tighter crop, losing some at either side, but particularly on the left. This would remove what looks like a raindrop at the far left centre.

Regards
David
Flickr

Nicola's Apartments, Kassiopi, Corfu

Some cameras, some lenses, some bits 'n' bobs
gwing
Posted 23/02/2014 - 18:30 Link
There aren't many tones left in the sky to work with, with something like this I tried to pull out colours and contrast bit, and crop.

Comment Image
Edited by gwing: 23/02/2014 - 18:44
davidstorm
Posted 23/02/2014 - 18:35 Link
That works better for me as a composition.

Regards
David
Flickr

Nicola's Apartments, Kassiopi, Corfu

Some cameras, some lenses, some bits 'n' bobs
MrB
Posted 23/02/2014 - 18:44 Link
Mono?

Comment Image


Philip
DrOrloff
Posted 23/02/2014 - 19:13 Link
The sky doesn't look blown to me. The background looks hazy and therefore rather flat butI think the sky is a good one to work with. I'd take the highlights down only a fraction then increase the black levels in the sky to boost the contrast. I'd lose the muddy slice at the bottom. The composition doesn't really flow for me as the Landie and the tracks seem entirely disconnected and therefore competing rather than complementary elements.
RalphHardwick
Posted 23/02/2014 - 19:27 Link
Thanks for all the comments and edits

For those of you that want to play with the original RAW file, to see if you can do better than me, you should be able to download it from here: link.

Gravelrash, the actual point of the photo was to capture the Land Rover against the british countryside. Without it I wouldn't have stopped

It's funny that many of my friends (Land Rover fans) have been very complimentary about the image. It just goes to show that we all see things in a different way.

A wider view, taken a few seconds later gives this:
Comment Image

Which adds some context to the tyre tracks and makes it even more attractive to Land Rover fans

Nigel. I brought down the higlights, added a grad filter and desaturated . I also increased the clarity and brought up the shadows.

David the dynamic range was wide and so, as Nigel said, the best bet would have been an ND grad or bracketed shots merged in PP. Unfortunately I had the camera and one lens, we were tired, had a 4 hour drive ahead of us and my family were waiting in the car

gwing and MrB nice efforts now you can play with the RAW file if you like
---------------------------------------------------------------------
CaptureLight Ltd
flickr
"I carry a camera to capture memories and the occasional photograph worthy of sharing"
colinB
Posted 23/02/2014 - 21:46 Link
Comment Image



I had a play with it in Lightroom and perfect effects.
Pentax K3, Pentax K5-11, Pentax K7, Pentax K100D Super, DA18-55mm f3.5-5.6, DA*60-250 F4, DA 50mm f1.8, DA 35mm f2.4 50mm f1.7K M, 50mm f2 M, Tamron SP90mm f2.5 macro M, Tamron AF 70mm-300mm f4-5.6, Yongnuo flashes, Yongnuo triggers, remote release.
Edited by colinB: 23/02/2014 - 21:48
Smeggypants
Posted 24/02/2014 - 02:06 Link
The fact that there's so many versions speaks volumes.
[i]Bodies: 1x K-5IIs, 2x K-5, Sony TX-5, Nokia 808
Lenses: Pentax DA 10-17mm ED(IF) Fish Eye, Pentax DA 14mm f/2.8, Sigma 17-70mm f/2.8, Pentax-A 28mm f/2.8, Sigma 30mm F1.4 EX DC, Pentax-A 50mm f/1.2, Pentax-A 50mm f/1.4, Pentax-FA 50mm f/1.4, Pentax-A 50mm f/1.7, Pentax DA* 50-135mm f/2.8, Sigma 135-400mm APO DG, and more ..
Flash: AF-540FGZ, Vivitar 283
RalphHardwick
Posted 24/02/2014 - 09:40 Link
Smeggypants wrote:
The fact that there's so many versions speaks volumes.
Does it? Please enlighten us
---------------------------------------------------------------------
CaptureLight Ltd
flickr
"I carry a camera to capture memories and the occasional photograph worthy of sharing"
McGregNi
Posted 24/02/2014 - 17:41 Link
It could mean one thing .... or the other
My Guides to the Pentax Digital Camera Flash Lighting System : Download here from the PentaxForums Homepage Article .... link
Pentax K7 with BG-4 Grip / Samyang 14mm f2.8 ED AS IF UMC / DA18-55mm f3.5-5.6 AL WR / SMC A28mm f2.8 / D FA 28-105mm / SMC F35-70 f3.5-4.5 / SMC A50mm f1.7 / Tamron AF70-300mm f4-5.6 Di LD macro / SMC M75-150mm f4.0 / Tamron Adaptall (CT-135) 135mm f2.8 / Asahi Takumar-A 2X tele-converter / Pentax AF-540FGZ (I & II) Flashes / Cactus RF60/X Flashes & V6/V6II Transceiver
smudge
Posted 24/02/2014 - 18:36 Link
I must be in the minority but I think the low contrast, low saturation treatment suits this image best; so I prefer the original version. I agree that the the muddy foreground is a bit distracting though.
Regards, Philip
bwlchmawr
Posted 24/02/2014 - 18:51 Link
I rather like it. The tricky lighting which caused exposure diffcult, adds so much to the atmosphere.

There's a shot within a shot as well. If you clone-out the Land Rover and create a square composition centred on the tracks, then convert to monochrome...
Best wishes,

Andrew

"These places mean something and it's the job of a photographer to figure-out what the hell it is."
Robert Adams
"The camera doesn't make a bit of difference.  All of them can record what you are seeing.  But, you have to SEE."
Ernst Hass
My website: http://www.ephotozine.com/user/bwlchmawr-199050
http://s927.photobucket.com/home/ADC3440/index
https://www.flickr.com/photos/78898196@N05

Add Comment

To leave a comment - Log in to Pentax User or create a new account.



Proudly supporting Pentax User

Samsung Logo Asahi Pentax Logo