A few more, still playing.
Posted 29/06/2026 - 16:34
Link
Colour preferred in the first pair due to rust/water contrast.
The third is a nice composition but I think the foreground is a little too blurry so slightly distracting. Did you shoot this one again (or similar) with a narrower aperture?
The third is a nice composition but I think the foreground is a little too blurry so slightly distracting. Did you shoot this one again (or similar) with a narrower aperture?
All the gear with no idea
Posted 29/06/2026 - 17:14
Link
HarisF1 wrote:
Colour preferred in the first pair due to rust/water contrast.
The third is a nice composition but I think the foreground is a little too blurry so slightly distracting. Did you shoot this one again (or similar) with a narrower aperture?
Yes I too prefer the colour. The aperture stayed I believe the same, 5.6 I think, but I deliberately got in too close to the seed heads for same effect of blur, breaking the hyperfocal if you like, I had been trying the same with flowers but they didn't fair too good, 😅 but no didn't shoot another as no time, swmbo is nowColour preferred in the first pair due to rust/water contrast.
The third is a nice composition but I think the foreground is a little too blurry so slightly distracting. Did you shoot this one again (or similar) with a narrower aperture?
Somewhat under my care.
Posted 29/06/2026 - 17:24
Link
Ps, I had Snap setting on with focus distance set at least 2.5 meters. Hence hyperfocal comment.
Posted 29/06/2026 - 17:54
Link
Posted 29/06/2026 - 22:38
Link
The colour one for me, too. The rust/water contrast gives a much more 'open' feel to the photo. Probably something to do with my brain associating the colour of the sea with wide open spaces whereas a different shade of grey doesn't have that association.
The blurred seed heads is an interesting experiment. I think the reason it doesn't work very well is that there isn't a distinct subject to draw the eye away from the blur in the foreground. If a bigger version of the tower in your last (poppy) shot were put in the middle distance of the seed head shot and a bit was cropped off the bottom of the blurred area, then it might work.
Steve
The blurred seed heads is an interesting experiment. I think the reason it doesn't work very well is that there isn't a distinct subject to draw the eye away from the blur in the foreground. If a bigger version of the tower in your last (poppy) shot were put in the middle distance of the seed head shot and a bit was cropped off the bottom of the blurred area, then it might work.
loadoftripe wrote:
swmbo is now Somewhat under my care.
Sensitively and delicately put. I might just start using it to explain my situation, too.swmbo is now Somewhat under my care.
Steve
Posted 30/06/2026 - 09:02
Link
I understand the preference for the colour one, but, but... that mono does so appeal.
The swmbo comment resonated. As Steve said, sensitively and delicately put.
The swmbo comment resonated. As Steve said, sensitively and delicately put.
Be well, stay safe, but most of all, invest in memories
Posted 30/06/2026 - 12:35
Link
Thanks for your comments guys, appreciated.
Posted 30/06/2026 - 13:51
Link
Even though I prefer colour, that mono is one of the few that works in mono for me.
Pentax K1-ii and MZ6
Pentax Lenses 28-80 F, 300 DA*, 80-200 F, 35 F2.4 AL, M50 F1.7, 28-105 DFA, 20 F4 SMC
ONE UNITED Member
Pentax Lenses 28-80 F, 300 DA*, 80-200 F, 35 F2.4 AL, M50 F1.7, 28-105 DFA, 20 F4 SMC
ONE UNITED Member
Posted 30/06/2026 - 15:36
Link
walkeja wrote:
Even though I prefer colour, that mono is one of the few that works in mono for me.
Thanks, glad it worked for you
Even though I prefer colour, that mono is one of the few that works in mono for me.
Add Comment
To leave a comment - Log in to Pentax User or create a new account.



1088 posts
6 years