A colour problem with my K5
Posted 03/04/2016 - 11:37
Link
You're still 180° out, and on several counts. For one, it's called bypass for a reason.
Posted 03/04/2016 - 12:42
Link
Layingback wrote:
Regards, Horst
Quote:
You're still 180° out, and on several counts. For one, it's called bypass for a reason.
Please explain.You're still 180° out, and on several counts. For one, it's called bypass for a reason.
Regards, Horst
Posted 03/04/2016 - 13:00
Link
"Bypass" as in go around (a town) or skip. It is also called Skip Bleach.
Developed for movie film to recreate the look of earlier colorized black & white film, by skipping the bleach step in color film process and thus leaving the silver in the film.
link
So doesn't involve bleach, nor spilling of same, nor in a photographer's darkroom, nor is it misnamed. Note with a photographic film process it would be more usual to do this Skip Bleach process on the print rather than the negative. Otherwise exactly as described ... not.
Developed for movie film to recreate the look of earlier colorized black & white film, by skipping the bleach step in color film process and thus leaving the silver in the film.
link
So doesn't involve bleach, nor spilling of same, nor in a photographer's darkroom, nor is it misnamed. Note with a photographic film process it would be more usual to do this Skip Bleach process on the print rather than the negative. Otherwise exactly as described ... not.
Posted 03/04/2016 - 13:03
Link
Here is the result of setting my K5 to neutral.
The lens was my 35mm DA f2.8 LTD. with a soft filter on front.
The oranges are orange again. This is the exact colour the rose was.
I had this problem for about a week and it was quite absenting. I thought I need to send the camera in for repair. However having a vague idea of the repair cost, I decided to sell a test instrument I didn't need anymore for a good (for the buyer) price on Ebay and then bought another K5 but this time a K5II also on Ebay from Japan.
I may have been a bit hasty, But on the other hand, It didn't really cost me anything and now I have a spare camera in case something happens again.
What I will most probably do, is to fit a M42 to K adapter and use it for my screw mount lenses.
Regards, Horst

The lens was my 35mm DA f2.8 LTD. with a soft filter on front.
The oranges are orange again. This is the exact colour the rose was.
I had this problem for about a week and it was quite absenting. I thought I need to send the camera in for repair. However having a vague idea of the repair cost, I decided to sell a test instrument I didn't need anymore for a good (for the buyer) price on Ebay and then bought another K5 but this time a K5II also on Ebay from Japan.
I may have been a bit hasty, But on the other hand, It didn't really cost me anything and now I have a spare camera in case something happens again.
What I will most probably do, is to fit a M42 to K adapter and use it for my screw mount lenses.
Regards, Horst

Posted 03/04/2016 - 13:08
Link
Horst,
If you have (now) have a K-5II you'll probably want to reverse the roles. K-5II's focus so much better in challenging low light scenarios.
If you have (now) have a K-5II you'll probably want to reverse the roles. K-5II's focus so much better in challenging low light scenarios.
Posted 03/04/2016 - 13:11
Link
This makes sense, I will do it the way you suggest.
Regards, Horst
Regards, Horst
Add Comment
To leave a comment - Log in to Pentax User or create a new account.


5986 posts
14 years
Surrey,
England
But you have to admit, even given all that, he or she was still rather silly to take that bleach bottle into the darkroom in the first place
Pentax K7 with BG-4 Grip / Samyang 14mm f2.8 ED AS IF UMC / DA18-55mm f3.5-5.6 AL WR / SMC A28mm f2.8 / D FA 28-105mm / SMC F35-70 f3.5-4.5 / SMC A50mm f1.7 / Tamron AF70-300mm f4-5.6 Di LD macro / SMC M75-150mm f4.0 / Tamron Adaptall (CT-135) 135mm f2.8 / Asahi Takumar-A 2X tele-converter / Pentax AF-540FGZ (I & II) Flashes / Cactus RF60/X Flashes & V6/V6II Transceiver