50-135 DA* sample pictures
24,195 posts
Link
Posted 23/03/2007 - 15:22
My opinion is that they look rather dull and could have been taken with anything. There's nothing there that would make me say "Wow!" and want to rush out and buy the lens.
Of course, that doesn't mean it isn't a terrfic lens, just that I'm not impressed by these particular pictures.
Best regards, John
Of course, that doesn't mean it isn't a terrfic lens, just that I'm not impressed by these particular pictures.
Best regards, John
Link
Posted 23/03/2007 - 15:36
Tokina + Canon report here:
http://www.photozone.de/8Reviews/lenses/tokina_50135_28/index.htm
Matt
http://www.mattmatic.co.uk
(For gallery, tips and links)
http://www.photozone.de/8Reviews/lenses/tokina_50135_28/index.htm
Matt
http://www.mattmatic.co.uk
(For gallery, tips and links)
Link
Posted 24/03/2007 - 23:47
You're not going to be able to judge a lens by looking at jpegs on the Internet. You need to look at RAW files at 100%.
42
42
Link
Posted 25/03/2007 - 10:46
Arthur Dent wrote:
You're not going to be able to judge a lens by looking at jpegs on the Internet. You need to look at RAW files at 100%.
You're not going to be able to judge a lens by looking at jpegs on the Internet. You need to look at RAW files at 100%.
agreed, best you can get off the net is someone else's subjective opinion of how the original files looked, plus MTF tests and the like which we all know are to be taken with a small salt mine.
Add a Comment
You must be registered or logged-in to comment.
Ammonyte
Member
Buckinghamshire
Tim the Ammonyte
--------------
K10D & sundry toys
http://www.ammonyte.com/photos.html