100mm F2.8 W/R Macro

DAE0707
Posted 08/01/2010 - 21:12 Link
Just got the new lens in our shop, had a brief play with it today. First results are highly impressive. hope to be able to post some test pictures soon. Don't think you are going to be disapointed with this lens. Dave
K7, Pentax 50-135mm, Pentax 55-300mm, Sigma 17-70mm OS
link
konrads
Posted 08/01/2010 - 21:31 Link
i'm sure you gonna get great shots with that
K20D,24-90 3.5-5.6,50-135 2.8 + GRIP. SAVING FOR 60-250 F4
FUJI S6500 + FUJI Z33WP
Konrad
konrads
Posted 08/01/2010 - 21:34 Link
ps: nice kit you've got
K20D,24-90 3.5-5.6,50-135 2.8 + GRIP. SAVING FOR 60-250 F4
FUJI S6500 + FUJI Z33WP
Konrad
Greytop
Posted 08/01/2010 - 21:37 Link
Dave, do you have happen to have a DFA 100 f/2.8, just wondering if you are able to make a comparison
Regards Huw

flickr
konrads
Posted 08/01/2010 - 21:42 Link
greytop do you think you'll see a noticible diffs? i don't think much if any
K20D,24-90 3.5-5.6,50-135 2.8 + GRIP. SAVING FOR 60-250 F4
FUJI S6500 + FUJI Z33WP
Konrad
DAE0707
Posted 08/01/2010 - 21:45 Link
Hi Greytop, no we are are a new Pro Centre, trying to get one from another branch so i can compare. Will let you know.. Was out in heavy snow to day, nice not to have to worry about getting it wet, Dave
K7, Pentax 50-135mm, Pentax 55-300mm, Sigma 17-70mm OS
link
konrads
Posted 08/01/2010 - 21:51 Link
DAE0707 wrote:
Hi Greytop, no we are are a new Pro Centre, trying to get one from another branch so i can compare. Will let you know.. Was out in heavy snow to day, nice not to have to worry about getting it wet, Dave
hi dave' where is your pro centre based :
K20D,24-90 3.5-5.6,50-135 2.8 + GRIP. SAVING FOR 60-250 F4
FUJI S6500 + FUJI Z33WP
Konrad
Oggy
Posted 08/01/2010 - 22:00 Link
I'd be interested* to hear how they compare. There seems to have been some mention of a "round" aperture.

(*no I wouldn't I've just bought the non WR :roll
DAE0707
Posted 08/01/2010 - 22:06 Link
sunny Colchester in Essex (sunny bit could be a lie at the moment !!) Dave
K7, Pentax 50-135mm, Pentax 55-300mm, Sigma 17-70mm OS
link
MrCynical
Posted 08/01/2010 - 22:10 Link
Oggy wrote:
I'd be interested* to hear how they compare. There seems to have been some mention of a "round" aperture.

(*no I wouldn't I've just bought the non WR :roll
AFAIK the new one is optically identical to the non-WR (which I have also recently purchased, in its Samsung disguise) with the exception of the aperture: the new WR has more aperture blades giving (in theory) rounder, smoother bokeh.
Greytop
Posted 08/01/2010 - 22:11 Link
Oggy wrote:
I'd be interested* to hear how they compare. There seems to have been some mention of a "round" aperture.

(*no I wouldn't I've just bought the non WR :roll
Could go either way Roger

By the way thanks Dave it will be interesting to hear about differences if any. WR always appeals to me, it's just a shame in wasn't to DA* standard.
Regards Huw

flickr
Daniel Bridge
Posted 09/01/2010 - 23:56 Link
DAE0707 wrote:
sunny Colchester in Essex (sunny bit could be a lie at the moment !!) Dave
Ahh, that's interesting. Just had a look on the Pentax website to see who you were, and noticed Cameraworld's no longer listed...

Dan
K-3, a macro lens and a DA*300mm...
Anvh
Posted 10/01/2010 - 00:22 Link
MrCynical wrote:
AFAIK the new one is optically identical to the non-WR (which I have also recently purchased, in its Samsung disguise) with the exception of the aperture: the new WR has more aperture blades giving (in theory) rounder, smoother bokeh.
You sure?

normal
WR

All that differs is
- housing (aluminium +WR)
- rounded diaphragm blades
- coating (Super Protection)

Also in theory rounded diaphragm blades does not give rounder, smoother bokeh.
Bokeh is simply the light distribution inside the Circle of Confusion, and yes that will become round but not smooth.
The smoothness of the out of focus blur is primarily defined by the optics so no you'll not see a difference in the quality of the blur but the round highlights will look more round instead of an octagon.

For someone that has a DFA 100mm the only reason to upgrade is for the housing really, better build quality and WR are nice things to have.
Stefan
Comment Image

K10D, K5
DA* 16-50, DA* 50-135, D-FA 100 Macro, DA 40 Ltd, DA 18-55
AF-540FGZ
RichardDay
Posted 10/01/2010 - 13:27 Link
Big difference between D-FA 100 & D-FA 100 WR bokeh due to the rounded blades D-FA100 WR bokeh
Best regards
Richard Day

Profile - link - (click on About for equipment profile) - My Flickr site - link
Oggy
Posted 10/01/2010 - 13:55 Link
That's quite impressive Richard. (Or in my case, quite depressing - see above :roll

Add Comment

To leave a comment - Log in to Pentax User or create a new account.



Proudly supporting Pentax User

Samsung Logo Asahi Pentax Logo