Search results for 'uv filter' - page 179

Use * as a wildcard for partial matches


smc FA 50mm f/1.4

some of those filters cost as much as a lens. maybe you'll need a cheaper filter to go in front of your hoya to protect the hoya. javascript:emoticon(':twisted:')

Posted by Don on 03/07/2007 - 15:11

smc FA 50mm f/1.4

With all that computing power going into the design, if it needed an extra bit of glass it would be designed with one...Adding more glass to the optical path can only degrade the image, it can't improve it. Of course, but it wouldn't matter to me if the degredation was very slight indeed, if my lens...

Posted by iceblinker on 03/07/2007 - 15:11

smc FA 50mm f/1.4

Talking about filters, I'd like to apply for the "Tuesday muppet award". I've put a UV filter and a thicker lens cap on the Pentax 400mm I acquired recently, and I was just thinking, hmm I wonder if it still fits in the case. So I slipped it into the case, and lo and behold, the top ...

Posted by ChrisA on 03/07/2007 - 16:05

smc FA 50mm f/1.4

Fifth: close to fourth, damage done to the front element caused by a filter smashing when the lens is dropped or knocked. It must be remembered that filters are much more delicate than lens elements, and much more likely to smash. When they do, it's likely that shards of glass will be driven inwards...

Posted by gartmore on 05/07/2007 - 20:40

smc FA 50mm f/1.4

I always use UV filters as a final level of protection. I also use a hood but that's only when the lens is on the camera. However, people forget that it's not only when it's in use that a lens is vulnerable. I had a lens fall out of it's case (which I hadn't done up properly) a while ago. The len...

Posted by lenscape on 20/07/2007 - 10:21

300m Lens needed or over

I look forward to receiving mine later today. It arrived and I'm very happy with it. The zoom is significantly stiffer than my old lense, but that's not a problem. Mind you, having to buy a new polarising filter for it is! I suppose I could've selotaped the 58mm filter from my old lense onto it, ...

Posted by Andrew McP on 06/07/2007 - 07:54

300m Lens needed or over

Mind you, having to buy a new polarising filter for it is! I suppose I could've selotaped the 58mm filter from my old lense onto it, but I suspect that might not be satisfactory. ;-) If you buy a new polarising filter how about buying one larger than you currently need, and a set of stepping rings...

Posted by Ammonyte on 07/07/2007 - 11:21

300m Lens needed or over

how about buying one larger than you currently need, and a set of stepping rings That's probably a very sensible solution... though as I'm waiting for Sigma to get round to making/importing some more PK-fit Bigmas, which take an 86mm filter, that'd be quite a step up! Anyway, too late now. Ebay i...

Posted by Andrew McP on 07/07/2007 - 13:31

Problem with Infrared filter (on Nikon...)

Hello! Recently i got an IR filter and tried it out on my K100D. As far as i'm concerned - everythings ok. BUT! I tried it on my sisters Nikon D40X, and nothing. It just makes completely black pictures. We tried different modes, nothing. What could be the problem? Could this be, that D40x d...

Posted by Jealousy on 06/07/2007 - 10:56

Problem with Infrared filter (on Nikon...)

Using an IR filter with a digital SLR relies on the CCD's bayer matrix and filter to allow at least some IR through! Some cameras (I've heard some Canons have the issue as well) have a heavy IR filter (or the sensor isn't sensitive to IR) so although the IR gets inside the camera it isn't recorde...

Posted by MattMatic on 06/07/2007 - 11:09

Problem with Infrared filter (on Nikon...)

... Some cameras (I've heard some Canons have the issue as well) have a heavy IR filter (or the sensor isn't sensitive to IR) so although the IR gets inside the camera it isn't recorded. Oh, my. And i bought that IR filter without knowing, that my Pentax might not work with it. Well, live and lea...

Posted by Jealousy on 06/07/2007 - 11:12

Which is Best?

Can anyone advise me please...I want to photograph insects/dragonflies etc by the water ie. wildlife photography and want to filter out the reflection of the sun/water etc...which poloriser would be best suited for this...Linear or Circular or maybe something completely different...want to buy one b...

Posted by Rae000 on 07/07/2007 - 17:14

Which is Best?

A circular polarizer will be fine for this. Linear polarizers can cause problems with auto focus cameras, I believe. Also with a circular polarizer, you can rotate the filter to get the best effect.

Posted by Ammonyte on 07/07/2007 - 17:35

Which is Best?

Also with a circular polarizer, you can rotate the filter to get the best effect. You can and do with any polariser, circular or linear. The circular or linear refers to the direction of polarisation utilised.

Posted by johnriley on 07/07/2007 - 18:08

Which is Best?

Think of polarising filters as Venetian blinds, the filter light waves coming in a particular direction, so if the blades on your blind are horizontal then only light coming in that direction gets through, rotate the blind and light coming at a different direction gets through. Both linear and ci...

Posted by gartmore on 07/07/2007 - 19:16

Which is Best?

OK, a circular polariser is easier to rotate? :oops: A fuller explanation of the options can be found here

Posted by Ammonyte on 08/07/2007 - 00:47

Pictures of Tucuman, Argentina mountains…

Gents, A dozen more pictures from my paradise…<snip> Thanks for your comment. Dirk Trotteyn K10D+Sigma 1:2.8 18-50mm EX DC lens. Another interesting set. I like the two portraits. Somehow they seem to convey the idea that life for these people isn't exactly easy. The aerial shots...

Posted by ChrisA on 15/07/2007 - 19:12

K100D or K100D Super

[quote:9f8c838cc4="Young ONe"]Hello, I am about to be new to the digital slr world. I do however have a pentax film slr so understand the workings of an slr, though it has been a while since I have had a good play with it. Anyay, I will be getting a K100D shortly, as after reading reviews a...

Posted by Tyr on 17/07/2007 - 12:56

Waterfall problem

tripod? manual exposure? manual focus? slow (100-200) iso? slow shutter? raw capture? nd filter if needed? (some will question this one....but...if you have a brightlight city, and want any detail in the sky...an upside down graduated nd filter will work). Bracket exposures by using various t...

Posted by Don on 22/07/2007 - 13:14

Waterfall problem

The essential thing is to use a slow shutter speed, and that means using a tripod to keep the camera steady. For water shots, you may need to put a neutral density filter on the lens because the slow shutter speed will lead to over-exposure unless it is a very gloomy day. The great thing about...

Posted by George Lazarette on 22/07/2007 - 14:08

Proudly supporting Pentax User

Samsung Logo Asahi Pentax Logo