Search results for 'sensor cleaning' - page 479
K-3 Vs. K-5iis
Physics I suppose. 30% less light per sensor site.
Posted by robbieclark on 13/11/2013 - 10:36
K-3 Vs. K-5iis
This don't make sense. The K-3 appears to be a step backwards in image quality at higher ASA settings. Do you think it's because Lightroom isn't geared up for the K-3 yet? Does the K-3 come with a new dedicated version of PDCU and what are images like when processed through that? I'd like to see....
Posted by Smeggypants on 13/11/2013 - 19:45
K-3 Vs. K-5iis
DNG maybe supported by the industry in general, but it is not an open standard. Major manufacturers are very secretive about how they handle sensor output. They are always making tweaks and adding 'pixie dust', which is why DNG only receives tacit support from them. As far as I know, if DNG outp...
Posted by stevejcoe on 14/11/2013 - 19:54
K-3 Vs. K-5iis
The 24 megapixel sensor and noise was the deciding factor on me not jumping early on the k-3 and I think I made the right decision to wait....
Posted by cabstar on 25/11/2013 - 13:09
K-3 Vs. K-5iis
The 24 megapixel sensor and noise was the deciding factor on me not jumping early on the k-3 and I think I made the right decision to wait.... Ditto...
Posted by aliengrove on 25/11/2013 - 13:38
K-3 Vs. K-5iis
The 24 megapixel sensor and noise was the deciding factor on me not jumping early on the k-3 and I think I made the right decision to wait.... Ditto... Ditto... Ditto ... I'd actually like better AF and may at some point change my K-5 for K-5II once the 2nd hand price for both levels out. Ul...
Posted by Smeggypants on 25/11/2013 - 17:49
K-3 Vs. K-5iis
Ultimately I want better High ISO performance and sadly the K-3 is worse in this respect compared to the K-5. Smegs, just out of interest, what sort of pictures do you take that are taken in light so low, are blown up so big, and need detail so fine, that a bit of NR and careful sharpening at high...
Posted by ChrisA on 25/11/2013 - 18:44
K-3 Vs. K-5iis
Ultimately I want better High ISO performance and sadly the K-3 is worse in this respect compared to the K-5. Smegs, just out of interest, what sort of pictures do you take that are taken in light so low, are blown up so big, and need detail so fine, that a bit of NR and careful sharpening at high...
Posted by Smeggypants on 26/11/2013 - 21:04
K-3 Vs. K-5iis
As a film shooter, I'm quite surprised that the only property of the K-3 v K-5 debate anybody's seems interested in in this thread is very high ISO noise performance. I guess it's an easy (read 'technical') comparison to make, using in many cases somebody else's photos downloaded off the web, in an ...
Posted by johnha on 26/11/2013 - 21:34
K-3 Vs. K-5iis
As a film shooter, I'm quite surprised that the only property of the K-3 v K-5 debate anybody's seems interested in in this thread is very high ISO noise performance. I guess it's an easy (read 'technical') comparison to make, using in many cases somebody else's photos downloaded off the web, in an ...
Posted by Smeggypants on 26/11/2013 - 23:11
K-3 Vs. K-5iis
As a film shooter, I'm quite surprised that the only property of the K-3 v K-5 debate anybody's seems interested in in this thread is very high ISO noise performance. I guess it's an easy (read 'technical') comparison to make, using in many cases somebody else's photos downloaded off the web, in an ...
Posted by johnha on 27/11/2013 - 00:46
K-3 Vs. K-5iis
[quote:3496ace15f="johnha"]As a film shooter, I'm quite surprised that the only property of the K-3 v K-5 debate anybody's seems interested in in this thread is very high ISO noise performance. I guess it's an easy (read 'technical') comparison to make, using in many cases somebody else's photos dow...
Posted by Smeggypants on 27/11/2013 - 01:27
K-3 Vs. K-5iis
16" x 12" @ 300dpi is 4800 x 3600 = 17MP. not far off the K-5 An image from the K30 is 4928 x 3264 so needs cropping to 4352 x 3264 (i.e. 4:3) before upsizing to 4800 x 3600 to produce a 300dpi 16" x 12" print. To produce a print that size at 300dpi that doesn't need upsizing, the sensor would have ...
Posted by andrewk on 27/11/2013 - 08:52
K-3 Vs. K-5iis
What I'd like is to centre focus on a subject, and then let the camera track focus on that subject while I recompose and the subject distance changes. Now that would be good. I dunno if even the K-3 can do this???? Basically this technology had reached a dead end since you can't have focus points ou...
Posted by kh1234567890 on 27/11/2013 - 10:06
K-3 Vs. K-5iis
K-3 will also allow harsher crops, so no contest for me when shooting wildlife. Precisely ... the K-3 with it's 24MP sensor means you wouldn't have to use the 1,4x teleconverter so you are saving a stop there as well.
Posted by Mike-P on 27/11/2013 - 19:53
K-3 Vs. K-5iis
What I'd like is to centre focus on a subject, and then let the camera track focus on that subject while I recompose and the subject distance changes. Now that would be good. I dunno if even the K-3 can do this???? Basically this technology had reached a dead end since you can't have focus points ou...
Posted by Smeggypants on 27/11/2013 - 20:39
K-3 Vs. K-5iis
K-3 will also allow harsher crops, so no contest for me when shooting wildlife. Precisely ... the K-3 with it's 24MP sensor means you wouldn't have to use the 1,4x teleconverter so you are saving a stop there as well. ----------------------------------------------- Yep, that's about the long and ...
Posted by dcweather on 28/11/2013 - 01:49
Ephotozine K-3 review
Well as you ask. I think f22 reveals more about the limitations of the sensor than the lens. I think you should have explained the limitations of your test on moire. Explaining that whilst setting 1 failed to eradicate it on this occassion, when used within the recommended parameters it may be mo...
Posted by Blythman on 15/11/2013 - 22:24
Ephotozine K-3 review
Ah, thank you. Surely though the sensor and lens are absolutely connected to the final result, equally. The point was a minor one, but the previous reviews were also offering an f/22 image, so it seems sensible that the latest one does to so a comparison can be made. I did observe that the 18-135...
Posted by johnriley on 15/11/2013 - 22:33
Ephotozine K-3 review
Interesting thread. What is the view of Forum members as to whether or not the 24mp sensor is now exceeding the resolution of many of the lenses we use today? How much more important is using quality glass on the K-3 than it was on the K-5 variants? Regards David
Posted by davidstorm on 15/11/2013 - 22:43
