Search results for 'sensor cleaning' - page 470
Officially K-3?
Does this settle the K3 equivalent of the K511/K5IIs debate before it starts? "Newly developed for the K-3, the anti-aliasing simulator* applies microscopic vibrations to the image sensor unit at the subpixel level during image exposure, generating the same level of moiré-reduction effect as an o...
Posted by McGregNi on 07/10/2013 - 16:42
Officially K-3?
[quote:3496ace15f="puma"]I find this very disappointing really hoping for FF not much different to the the k5iis, and lets be truthful who gives a crap about wi fi or gps ??:? Apart from the ff theres lots of improvement over the k-5 mkii but the Nikon D610 is an entry-level full frame DSLR is the...
Posted by cabstar on 07/10/2013 - 22:41
Officially K-3?
Sorry i bored you shaun with why i am in a quandary. If you want full frame badly then swap systems as pentax arent going to release a full frame body fir at least a year now, but to get a full frame with the specs of the k-3 you are going to have to get a 5d mkiii because apart from the ff sens...
Posted by cabstar on 07/10/2013 - 23:01
Officially K-3?
Sorry i bored you shaun with why i am in a quandary. If you want full frame badly then swap systems as pentax arent going to release a full frame body fir at least a year now, but to get a full frame with the specs of the k-3 you are going to have to get a 5d mkiii because apart from the ff sens...
Posted by puma on 07/10/2013 - 23:06
Officially K-3?
Sorry i bored you shaun with why i am in a quandary. If you want full frame badly then swap systems as pentax arent going to release a full frame body fir at least a year now, but to get a full frame with the specs of the k-3 you are going to have to get a 5d mkiii because apart from the ff sens...
Posted by Daniel Bridge on 07/10/2013 - 23:15
Officially K-3?
K5iis High sensitivity CMOS sensor with a primary colour filter 23.7mm x 15.7mm - approx. 16.3 megapixels JPEG: [16M] 4928x3264 pixels, [10M] 3936x2624 pixels, [6M] 3072x2048 pixels, [2M] 1728x1152 pixels 4 levels of quality in JPEG (good, better, best, premium) RAW 14 bits : [16M] 4928x3264...
Posted by puma on 07/10/2013 - 23:54
Officially K-3?
The specs mean very little on any camera if the sensor implementation, processor, imaging software etc. don't cut it. I am reserving my final judgement on the K-3 until we've seen some proper reviews, but I fully expect it to out-perform the K-5 quite comfortably. If it does, that will be good eno...
Posted by davidstorm on 08/10/2013 - 00:02
Officially K-3?
Well, I for one couldn't care less about full frame, so the K-3 is far more appealing to me than if they'd announced something with a bigger sensor. So maybe they have listened to all the people who think the K-5 (various models) is superb, but could be made even better with a more flexible autofoc...
Posted by BarryPearson on 08/10/2013 - 00:17
Officially K-3?
I want and need to excel A lot of people excel with an APS-C sensor. The size of the sensor doesn't improve the photographer. Just ask Benjikan.
Posted by pentaxian450 on 08/10/2013 - 01:49
Officially K-3?
I want and need to excel A lot of people excel with an APS-C sensor. The size of the sensor doesn't improve the photographer. Just ask Benjikan. Indeed, but sometimes technical differences can make a difference to when you can excel and with what IQ you can excel. An example. I'd like to tak...
Posted by Smeggypants on 08/10/2013 - 03:06
Officially K-3?
I want and need to excel A lot of people excel with an APS-C sensor. The size of the sensor doesn't improve the photographer. Just ask Benjikan. The same Benjikan who just went FF and is crowing all over the forums about the uplift in image quality?
Posted by Pentaxophile on 08/10/2013 - 07:13
Officially K-3?
This new camera does not change the core of the 'FF' vs 'Crop' debate, and it will not stop those photographers who feel they need 'FF' now from going and getting it (and paying highly for it of course) - indeed as we've just been seeing it may tip some over the edge away from pentax very quickly. ...
Posted by McGregNi on 08/10/2013 - 11:17
Officially K-3?
Its clearly going to be one of the best crop sensor cameras you can buy. There's plenty of interesting new details to pore over. The h.264 video is new I think? Does this mean full hd in a new file format? Am I right that .AVI is more compressed? If so then I guess the bigger files from this k-3 wi...
Posted by Dave-L on 08/10/2013 - 19:09
Officially K-3?
Is the image stabilisation the real mechanical deal, or a simulated software version like it apparently is on the K-30? :?::?: I've never heard that. 'Image Stabilization'on Pentax is Sensor Shake Reduction on all the current DSLRs, AFAIK, IMO, even on the IoW :D
Posted by McGregNi on 09/10/2013 - 00:24
Officially K-3?
Is the image stabilisation the real mechanical deal, or a simulated software version like it apparently is on the K-30? :?::?: I've never heard that. 'Image Stabilization'on Pentax is Sensor Shake Reduction on all the current DSLRs, AFAIK, IMO, even on the IoW :D Yeah it was news to me, and there a...
Posted by richandfleur on 09/10/2013 - 01:12
Officially K-3?
OK, if its about video, I know that on the K7 / K5 models it is the 'mechanical' ie: moving sensor type of shake reduction that is active - you can hear it working and the sound changing as the camera moves around and see the 'floating picture' effect on the LCD. I was not aware that Pentax had c...
Posted by McGregNi on 09/10/2013 - 16:07
Officially K-3?
£1100 for crop sensor pentax ? I keep k-7 and will buy canon 6D . Sorry Ricoh ps it is only my opinion I hope
Posted by samson51 on 10/10/2013 - 18:54
Officially K-3?
If I banged my head, and woke up to find I "needed" more pixels, then I would do what to me seems the obvious solution, and that is to acquire a 645D. I would then have a choice of formats at my disposal, with all the ergonomic advantages of the K-mount on the one hand, and LOADS of pixels on the ot...
Posted by Pentaxophile on 11/10/2013 - 10:59
Officially K-3?
If I banged my head, and woke up to find I "needed" more pixels, then I would do what to me seems the obvious solution, and that is to acquire a 645D. I would then have a choice of formats at my disposal, with all the ergonomic advantages of the K-mount on the one hand, and LOADS of pixels on the ot...
Posted by George Lazarette on 11/10/2013 - 11:34
Officially K-3?
Just reading around the internet and noticed a couple of things, one from DPreview and one on Steve Huff: DPreview have a preview of the K3 and they love it. There only critism was despite all the extra AF points, the AF barely performed any better than the K5 II. And on Steve Huff, someone me...
Posted by Russ on 11/10/2013 - 12:04
