Search results for 'back focus' - page 2885
Lincolnshire
Now really people, this is not supposed to be about internet connectivity issues in isolated areas - its about the OPs photograph at Belton House .... so back on topic please.
Posted by McGregNi on 08/06/2014 - 10:24
Lincolnshire
Isolated ? I saw a person a couple of weeks ago......... ! That must have been me then:D Getting back on the subject I do like the vivid colours John .
Posted by co049 on 08/06/2014 - 17:00
More Bearded Tit
You seem to be getting the hang of the 560. I like the uninterrupted view of #3 Thanks Barrie. They're little buggers. There's always (well almost) a reed in front of them, which makes it hard to focus on them. I've got loads of in focus reed photos with the two bearded tits nicely out of focus.:rol...
Posted by Blythman on 07/06/2014 - 19:48
Fish Supper
Here's an example which would have been a far better shot if it had worked. Problems were mostly that the dolphins were quick, here and gone and never in the same place twice.. Although I was using the monopod you have to take into account my shakey hand too... The blur to the left is the back of so...
Posted by Steep on 07/06/2014 - 22:05
Fish Supper
Here's an example which would have been a far better shot if it had worked. Problems were mostly that the dolphins were quick, here and gone and never in the same place twice.. Although I was using the monopod you have to take into account my shakey hand too... The blur to the left is the back of so...
Posted by Smeggypants on 07/06/2014 - 22:50
Fish Supper
Cheers guys. I've never been that happy with the results at higher iso settings so tend to keep it at 100 as much as possible. The second shot there was at 1/400th so shutter speed/iso wasn't the problem. The more I look at it the more I think the focus is a bit out and that's probably down to using...
Posted by Steep on 07/06/2014 - 23:19
Fish Supper
Cheers guys. I've never been that happy with the results at higher iso settings so tend to keep it at 100 as much as possible. The second shot there was at 1/400th so shutter speed/iso wasn't the problem. The more I look at it the more I think the focus is a bit out and that's probably down to using...
Posted by dougf8 on 07/06/2014 - 23:24
Fish Supper
I was using AV mode to try and keep a decent depth of field and shooting RAW, I suppose I could try full manual next time and trust to RAW to let me drag the exposure back up. Or bite the bullet and just go higher on the iso. One thing I've noticed is that using AF-C slows the burst rate way down.
Posted by Steep on 07/06/2014 - 23:52
Fish Supper
Cheers guys. I've never been that happy with the results at higher iso settings so tend to keep it at 100 as much as possible. The second shot there was at 1/400th so shutter speed/iso wasn't the problem. I disagree, 1/400 is far too slow for stuff splashing about in water with a 300mm lens ...
Posted by Smeggypants on 08/06/2014 - 00:48
Fish Supper
Cheers guys. I've never been that happy with the results at higher iso settings so tend to keep it at 100 as much as possible. The second shot there was at 1/400th so shutter speed/iso wasn't the problem. The more I look at it the more I think the focus is a bit out and that's probably down to using...
Posted by michaelblue on 08/06/2014 - 05:23
Fish Supper
[quote:3496ace15f="Steep"]Cheers guys. I've never been that happy with the results at higher iso settings so tend to keep it at 100 as much as possible. The second shot there was at 1/400th so shutter speed/iso wasn't the problem. The more I look at it the more I think the focus is a bit out and tha...
Posted by Smeggypants on 08/06/2014 - 09:29
Fish Supper
I'm thinking of going back today so I'll try you way smeggy and buy you a pint if it works :)
Posted by Steep on 08/06/2014 - 10:01
Fish Supper
Cheers guys. I've never been that happy with the results at higher iso settings so tend to keep it at 100 as much as possible. The second shot there was at 1/400th so shutter speed/iso wasn't the problem. I disagree, 1/400 is far too slow for stuff splashing about in water with a 300mm lens ...
Posted by AlexJh on 25/11/2015 - 12:54
Fish Supper
In digital, I wouldn't use 100ASA for anything except as a means of reducing light gathering in very bright shots... it doesn't seem to give better results... as opposed to the analogue days... especially with todays sensors... 200 min... very happy with 800 these days... even on the old *istD ...
Posted by drofmit on 03/12/2015 - 00:29
Fish Supper
Here's an example which would have been a far better shot if it had worked. Problems were mostly that the dolphins were quick, here and gone and never in the same place twice.. Although I was using the monopod you have to take into account my shakey hand too... The blur to the left is the back of so...
Posted by davidtrout on 03/12/2015 - 18:49
Our garden residents
Thanks both :D The young sparrow shot was a little overexposed but is also cropped a lot which can't have helped the detail. Matty, I chose the 200mm f4 for the brirds coming closer to where I was as the 400mm I have won't focus below 5.5 metres :wink: It is like many old lenses when I use...
Posted by Stuey on 08/06/2014 - 19:32
Portrait pictures at American Football game
Agree with Stuey, 1 needs to be brighter (still the best of the bunch imo) and I think 2 would have been better with focus on the player rather than the coach. I have to say number 5 looks totally out of place as an American football player. :lol:
Posted by Mike-P on 09/06/2014 - 19:01
Barn Owl
Front on views are stunning, quick question do you use manual focus or auto?
Posted by JammyBee on 09/06/2014 - 07:35
Mad dogs and Englishmen on a trip to the coast
Just for fun, my first trip out with the new K5IIs and the Tamron 70-200 2.8 gave me an ideal opportunity to observe the average 'day tripper'. These are really presented just for fun but as always any C+C welcome. Carl 1. I thought they said this was a treat - I don't see any treats! ...
Posted by fritzthedog on 09/06/2014 - 12:47
My First Red Arrows of 2014
Many thanks for the comments, I'm glad everyone enjoyed them. I have never used the K-5II and 7D side by side before and I have to say that with regard to actual focus speed there is very little in it but there was quite a difference in tacking ability which meant the Canon gave more keepers. ...
Posted by Mike-P on 10/06/2014 - 12:16
