Search results for 'back focus' - page 2135
Out of focus or blur?
All I see is a pair of jumping jean clad legs, no eyes and the cheeks I suspect are not those being referred to by others. Then something about ad free browsing. Obviously I'm seeing something different to everyone else. Do I need to subscribe to flikr to view it now? no you shouldn't are you say...
Posted by sebas77 on 22/05/2017 - 11:36
Out of focus or blur?
Think its just an advert.
Posted by JAK on 22/05/2017 - 12:10
Out of focus or blur?
The model may have moved John, but i don't think the wall did !
Posted by pschlute on 22/05/2017 - 12:52
Out of focus or blur?
I am sorry for your bandwidth :(
Posted by sebas77 on 22/05/2017 - 12:59
Out of focus or blur?
Ah right, not this then: I agree if you pixel peep the image is slightly not sharp, though nothing serious. At a normal viewing distance you'd never notice. To me the ear looks to be the sharpest point. If you've pre-focused it could be accounted for by a very slight movement of yourself b...
Posted by JAK on 22/05/2017 - 14:08
Out of focus or blur?
well then I have to post the images that are actually sharp. The difference is stunning. I like the new Flickr interface, but the community is worthless now.
Posted by sebas77 on 22/05/2017 - 14:30
Out of focus or blur?
Have you checked your 28-105 for front/back focussing? In any event, should a portrait be pin sharp? Views might differ with regards to that.
Posted by JAK on 22/05/2017 - 14:49
Out of focus or blur?
the eyes should be sharp, if I need to soften something, I'll do in pp. I will do some test with the lens, but imo this is blur, not focus issue.
Posted by sebas77 on 22/05/2017 - 16:21
Out of focus or blur?
Is the lens slightly front focussed? The front of the brick wall looks all to be sharp up to the face then soft from the cheek onwards...
Posted by cabstar on 22/05/2017 - 17:53
Out of focus or blur?
I hope is that the problem. Some times the camera just fails to focus properly, always been like this with pentax.
Posted by sebas77 on 22/05/2017 - 18:04
Out of focus or blur?
I thought I'd have a closer look at your image, and came up with this after applying levels and some sharpening. That doesn't seem far off to me?
Posted by johnriley on 22/05/2017 - 18:26
Out of focus or blur?
Once I am home I will show you what this lens can do when it's not out of focus and/or blurry :)
Posted by sebas77 on 22/05/2017 - 18:41
Out of focus or blur?
that's how the lens performs when the SR doesn't act up
Posted by sebas77 on 23/05/2017 - 08:18
Out of focus or blur?
That's a lot better and you can now see that shake probably by not holding the camera steady enough has taken the edge off the original. It could be the SR mechanism, but it's unlikely. At 1/250th it's better to leave SR off. It was originally intended for around 1/30th sec. -- --
Posted by Algernon on 23/05/2017 - 11:46
Out of focus or blur?
that's a good point, I wish it would automatically turn off beyond a give speed.
Posted by sebas77 on 23/05/2017 - 11:50
Out of focus or blur?
that's a good point, I wish it would automatically turn off beyond a give speed. That would be a good idea and surely simple to implement as an option.
Posted by JAK on 23/05/2017 - 12:22
Out of focus or blur?
that's a good point, I wish it would automatically turn off beyond a give speed. That would be a good idea and surely simple to implement as an option. And it would give users something extra to moan about :lol: ..... sort of a bonus moan like SR in video :shock: :mrgreen: :wink: --
Posted by Algernon on 23/05/2017 - 12:42
Out of focus or blur?
That's a lot better and you can now see that shake probably by not holding the camera steady enough has taken the edge off the original. It could be the SR mechanism, but it's unlikely. At 1/250th it's better to leave SR off. It was originally intended for around 1/30th sec. -- -- That's an ...
Posted by PeterKR on 23/05/2017 - 14:02
Out of focus or blur?
When I take photos hand held at 300mm and 1/250thsec, I'm extremely glad for SR ....I doubt I'd get much that's usable without it.
Posted by McGregNi on 23/05/2017 - 14:29
Out of focus or blur?
the rule is that the inversion of the shutter speed should be always higher than the focal length, at that point you wouldn't need the SR. So your point is valid, the firmware should decide when to disable it according the focal length :)
Posted by sebas77 on 23/05/2017 - 15:25
