Hot pixels
Posted 20/12/2006 - 14:35
Link
When do you see them? with long exposures and noise reduction off or do you see them allways?
Camera:K20D|Ist*DS|Spotmatic II|MZ-10
Pentax Lenses: DA16-45|DA50-200|50A 1.7
Tamron Lenses: 28-200
Takumar Lenses: SMC 55 1.8
Sigma Lenses: EX DG 50-500 'Bigma'|EX 50mm Macro
Flashes: Metz 58 AF-1|Samsung SEF-36PZF|Pentax AF-220T
Pentax Lenses: DA16-45|DA50-200|50A 1.7
Tamron Lenses: 28-200
Takumar Lenses: SMC 55 1.8
Sigma Lenses: EX DG 50-500 'Bigma'|EX 50mm Macro
Flashes: Metz 58 AF-1|Samsung SEF-36PZF|Pentax AF-220T
Posted 20/12/2006 - 15:01
Link
Nearly always - just one, in the same place each time, though strangely it's not there on about 10% of my shots. But, in the main it's there always, whether shooting RAW or JPEG.
By the way, thanks for the quick reply.
Jonathan
By the way, thanks for the quick reply.
Jonathan
Posted 20/12/2006 - 15:05
Link
Stuck pixels are pretty common. If it's only one, then there's not too much to worry about. I have three on my *ist-D, and more when using high ISO and long exposure. You'll probably get more as it gets older.
Although you could ask for a replacement (dealers have differing views), you'll could end up with more!
Shooting RAW is fine because in Capture One and Silkypix they automatically detect stuck pixels and map them out. If you shoot JPG, or use other RAW conversion software then the healing brush or healing patch tools in Photoshop help out.
It's no worse than dealing with dust spots
Matt
Although you could ask for a replacement (dealers have differing views), you'll could end up with more!
Shooting RAW is fine because in Capture One and Silkypix they automatically detect stuck pixels and map them out. If you shoot JPG, or use other RAW conversion software then the healing brush or healing patch tools in Photoshop help out.
It's no worse than dealing with dust spots
Matt
Posted 21/12/2006 - 12:11
Link
MattMatic wrote:
Shooting RAW is fine because in Capture One and Silkypix they automatically detect stuck pixels and map them out.
Shooting RAW is fine because in Capture One and Silkypix they automatically detect stuck pixels and map them out.
thats interesting, suddenly I'm more inclined to get to grips with real silkypix....
Posted 21/12/2006 - 12:58
Link
Thanks for the advice - I think I'll live with it. Obviously it's nothing compared to spotting scans, which I'm well used to doing! Plus it's good to know that a decent RAW convertor will sort that out automatically.
Thanks again,
Jonathan
Thanks again,
Jonathan
Posted 04/01/2007 - 12:11
Link
Hot pixels will change colour slightly depending upon exposure time a way of overcoming this without clogging the pc with yet more software is:-
After taking an original image replace the lense cap and take another image at exactly the same settings and duration and the first - this gives you a black frame with the same hot pixels.
In Photoshop open both images and overlay the black frame on the main image.
Now change the blending mode of the black layer to Difference and adjust its opacity to suit your needs.
The hot pixels are now gone.
After taking an original image replace the lense cap and take another image at exactly the same settings and duration and the first - this gives you a black frame with the same hot pixels.
In Photoshop open both images and overlay the black frame on the main image.
Now change the blending mode of the black layer to Difference and adjust its opacity to suit your needs.
The hot pixels are now gone.
Old wood best to burn, old wine to drink, old friends to trust, and old authors to read.
Posted 10/01/2007 - 18:40
Link
What are Hot Pixels
Posted 10/01/2007 - 19:47
Link
"A hot pixel is created by an element with a higher rate of charge leakage than its neighbors which, on a long exposure, may cross the threshold of an exposed value. Many digicams don't permit exposures longer than a quarter second, which effectively eliminates the chance that any element with a dark current, so to speak, will consistently report an exposure value."
according to http://www.imaging-resource.com/ARTS/HOT/HOT.HTM which explaines it far better than I can!
according to http://www.imaging-resource.com/ARTS/HOT/HOT.HTM which explaines it far better than I can!
Add Comment
To leave a comment - Log in to Pentax User or create a new account.
175 posts
18 years
UK
Jonathan