Church at Letwell
by davidstorm
Letwell is a little hamlet close to Oldcotes and Tickhill on the Nottinghamshire / South Yorkshire Border. This is the Church as seen across the Rape Seed fields.
K-5IIs, Sigma DG 17-70 F2.8-4 Macro, Hitech ND Soft Grad 0.9
K-5IIs, Sigma DG 17-70 F2.8-4 Macro, Hitech ND Soft Grad 0.9
Uploaded06/04/2014 - 19:48
CategoryLandscape / Travel
Views/Likes109/0
Posted 07/04/2014 - 06:22
Link
I like the contrast in colour and tone, David.
Best wishes,
Andrew
"These places mean something and it's the job of a photographer to figure-out what the hell it is."
Robert Adams
"The camera doesn't make a bit of difference. All of them can record what you are seeing. But, you have to SEE."
Ernst Hass
My website: http://www.ephotozine.com/user/bwlchmawr-199050 http://s927.photobucket.com/home/ADC3440/index
https://www.flickr.com/photos/78898196@N05
Andrew
"These places mean something and it's the job of a photographer to figure-out what the hell it is."
Robert Adams
"The camera doesn't make a bit of difference. All of them can record what you are seeing. But, you have to SEE."
Ernst Hass
My website: http://www.ephotozine.com/user/bwlchmawr-199050 http://s927.photobucket.com/home/ADC3440/index
https://www.flickr.com/photos/78898196@N05
Posted 07/04/2014 - 09:15
Link
bwlchmawr wrote:
I like the contrast in colour and tone, David.
I like the contrast in colour and tone, David.
Me too - it looks lovely. Did you have to colour correct the Hi-Tech ND grad to get back to a grey sky?
Andy
Posted 07/04/2014 - 12:43
Link
As has been said pour moi aussi!
Mac from Montreal
SP, SPII, SPF, PZ-10, P30, SFX, K110D, istDS, Optio 60, Z-10, H90, RZ10, I-10, f3.5 28mm, f1.8 55mm, f1.4 50mm, f3.5 135mm, f2.5 135mm, f4 50mm Macro, f4.5 80-200 F, f4 35-70, f3.5 28-80, f3.5 35-135, f3.5 18-55, f1.8 31mm Ltd., two Auto 110's, Auto 110 lenses and filters, tubes, bellows, Manfrottos and a sore back.
SP, SPII, SPF, PZ-10, P30, SFX, K110D, istDS, Optio 60, Z-10, H90, RZ10, I-10, f3.5 28mm, f1.8 55mm, f1.4 50mm, f3.5 135mm, f2.5 135mm, f4 50mm Macro, f4.5 80-200 F, f4 35-70, f3.5 28-80, f3.5 35-135, f3.5 18-55, f1.8 31mm Ltd., two Auto 110's, Auto 110 lenses and filters, tubes, bellows, Manfrottos and a sore back.
Posted 07/04/2014 - 17:00
Link
Delightful picture.
Best Wishes
Andy
Best Wishes
Andy
Posted 07/04/2014 - 19:24
Link
bwlchmawr wrote:
I like the contrast in colour and tone, David.
I like the contrast in colour and tone, David.
Me too
Malc
Posted 07/04/2014 - 22:47
Link
alfpics wrote:
Me too - it looks lovely. Did you have to colour correct the Hi-Tech ND grad to get back to a grey sky?
bwlchmawr wrote:
I like the contrast in colour and tone, David.
I like the contrast in colour and tone, David.
Me too - it looks lovely. Did you have to colour correct the Hi-Tech ND grad to get back to a grey sky?
Hi Andy, I usually reduce both cyan and blue in the sky, more so the higher the strength of the ND Grad filter. This was 0.9, so more reduction in these tones. However, I also do this sometimes without a filter being used, I don't think the Hitechs are bad at all in this regard and the cast is so easy to remove. I do prefer a natural grey tone in the sky and always try to make it as close to what my eye saw as I possibly can.
Regards
David
Posted 08/04/2014 - 14:19
Link
Nice contrasts!
Posted 17/04/2014 - 09:33
Link
This one grabbed me as I was flicking through the gallery..then I saw it was David again. Had to be! Nice composition. You've handled those yellows well - they can be overpowering.
Sorry if I've asked this before but I often see you use grad filters. Any reason you choose to do it this way, rather than post process from bracketed exposures as I tend to do (mostly through laziness)? I can see there may be pros and cons but I imagine the end results would look much the same.
Sorry if I've asked this before but I often see you use grad filters. Any reason you choose to do it this way, rather than post process from bracketed exposures as I tend to do (mostly through laziness)? I can see there may be pros and cons but I imagine the end results would look much the same.
Posted 20/04/2014 - 00:31
Link
WaypointCharlie wrote:
This one grabbed me as I was flicking through the gallery..then I saw it was David again. Had to be! Nice composition. You've handled those yellows well - they can be overpowering.
Sorry if I've asked this before but I often see you use grad filters. Any reason you choose to do it this way, rather than post process from bracketed exposures as I tend to do (mostly through laziness)? I can see there may be pros and cons but I imagine the end results would look much the same.
This one grabbed me as I was flicking through the gallery..then I saw it was David again. Had to be! Nice composition. You've handled those yellows well - they can be overpowering.
Sorry if I've asked this before but I often see you use grad filters. Any reason you choose to do it this way, rather than post process from bracketed exposures as I tend to do (mostly through laziness)? I can see there may be pros and cons but I imagine the end results would look much the same.
I do this because I like to get the shot 'right' in camera. If it is right in the first instance it gives so much more scope for processing - nothing needs to be forced and the end result is, I believe, more natural and easier on the eye. I try to avoid blown highlights and unrecoverable shadows at all costs, to the extent that I delete any images (no matter how good) that have any blown highlights or unrecoverable shadows. This is a rule I have always applied and it seems to work for me.
Regards
David
Posted 24/04/2014 - 10:41
Link
Thanks David. I think that's a good approach. It certainly seems to work for you and I do admire your landscapes. A while back I found them a bit more contrasty than I would dare, but not so now. Perhaps you're easing off on the contrast. More likely my taste has developed!
Add Comment
To leave a comment - Log in to Pentax User or create a new account.
473 posts
14 years
Derbyshire
https://www.facebook.com/pages/Maria-Gray-photography/589310071158079?ref=hl