Two cones please
Photo Information
09/02/2015 - 00:04BigMalks
CategoryClose Up
LensN/A
ISO100
Focal Length35mm
Link
Posted 09/02/2015 - 04:44
Love the title 😄 ....and the strength of this picture...and yeah wow, long exposure on this one!
Cheers...Donna 😊
Cheers...Donna 😊
Link
Posted 09/02/2015 - 12:06
Clever title 
Best Regards, Larry.
All the gear & no idea.
Best Regards, Larry.
All the gear & no idea.
Link
Posted 09/02/2015 - 16:20
davidwozhere wrote:
I just looked at the EXIF.
How many 'takes' did that entail, to get it right? (It was certainly well worth it).
I just looked at the EXIF.
How many 'takes' did that entail, to get it right? (It was certainly well worth it).
Yes I had to have a couple of goes, it was the white balance I struggled with more than anything.
Thanks to everybody for their support and comments
Malcolm
Link
Posted 09/02/2015 - 20:36
BigMalks wrote:
Yes I had to have a couple of goes, it was the white balance I struggled with more than anything.
Thanks to everybody for their support and comments
Malcolm
davidwozhere wrote:
I just looked at the EXIF.
How many 'takes' did that entail, to get it right? (It was certainly well worth it).
I just looked at the EXIF.
How many 'takes' did that entail, to get it right? (It was certainly well worth it).
Yes I had to have a couple of goes, it was the white balance I struggled with more than anything.
Thanks to everybody for their support and comments
Malcolm
Well worth your time and effort, excellent result
Malc
Add a Comment
You must be registered or logged-in to comment.
davidwozhere
9 yearsMember
Slap in the middle of England
How many 'takes' did that entail, to get it right? (It was certainly well worth it).
Both the *istDS and the K5 are incurably addicted to old glass
My page on Photocrowd - link