Warm Light
Photo Information
Tried a window-lit shot with a couple of reflectors. Creatively speaking, it's not that great of a photo, but I'm very proud of the technical quality of this shot. It's from my K10 and it's been cropped down to 2.6 megapixels, yet the SMC Asahi 50mm I used was so sharp, that even those 2.6 megapixels were enough to make this beautiful 11x17 print I have on the wall beside me right now.
It was this shot that convinced me entirely that megapixels do not matter at all, as long as your lens is sharp and your technique is good.
It was this shot that convinced me entirely that megapixels do not matter at all, as long as your lens is sharp and your technique is good.
12/07/2010 - 08:21Dubious Drewski
CategoryPortraits / People
LensN/A
ISO200
Focal Length50mm
Views/Likes117/1
Link
Posted 12/07/2010 - 12:22
I think I shall stop commenting on your posts Dubi as I seem to love all of them, except those featuring guns! Even the burned out area of this one works for me. If there was a standard for us all to attempt to equal I think it would be yours!
SJ., if this was a shot of a wizened old man/lady would that still be an attractive model?
Paul.
Photography is not a sport. It has no rules. Everything must be dared and tried! (Bill Brandt)
PPG
SJ., if this was a shot of a wizened old man/lady would that still be an attractive model?
Paul.
Photography is not a sport. It has no rules. Everything must be dared and tried! (Bill Brandt)
PPG
Link
Posted 12/07/2010 - 13:05
For those who remember Grace Kelly.........
I love this.
Mac from Montreal
SP, SPII, SPF, PZ-10, P30, SFX, K110D, istDS, Optio 60, Z-10, H90, RZ10, I-10, f3.5 28mm, f1.8 55mm, f1.4 50mm, f3.5 135mm, f2.5 135mm, f4 50mm Macro, f4.5 80-200 F, f4 35-70, f3.5 28-80, f3.5 35-135, f3.5 18-55, f1.8 31mm Ltd., two Auto 110's, Auto 110 lenses and filters, tubes, bellows, Manfrottos and a sore back.
I love this.
Mac from Montreal
SP, SPII, SPF, PZ-10, P30, SFX, K110D, istDS, Optio 60, Z-10, H90, RZ10, I-10, f3.5 28mm, f1.8 55mm, f1.4 50mm, f3.5 135mm, f2.5 135mm, f4 50mm Macro, f4.5 80-200 F, f4 35-70, f3.5 28-80, f3.5 35-135, f3.5 18-55, f1.8 31mm Ltd., two Auto 110's, Auto 110 lenses and filters, tubes, bellows, Manfrottos and a sore back.
Link
Posted 12/07/2010 - 19:37
Don't waste time and energy knocking yourself, Dub: there are plenty of people out there who'll do it more forcefully and for free
Loved the image (are we still allowed to say this? cf recent exchanges in the forum
) because of, and not in spite of, the 'lighting errors'.
Friend or model?
Regards,
Jon
Loved the image (are we still allowed to say this? cf recent exchanges in the forum
) because of, and not in spite of, the 'lighting errors'.Friend or model?
Regards,
Jon
Last Edited by prsjnb on 12/07/2010 - 19:39
Link
Posted 20/08/2010 - 15:59
She's eyes are excellent. Nice shot and light . Congratulations
Emre
Regards;
Emre
Emre
Regards;
Emre
Add a Comment
You must be registered or logged-in to comment.
sam-joseph
13 yearsMember
Newcastle, NSW, Australia
It was this shot that convinced me entirely that megapixels do not matter at all, as long as your lens is sharp and your technique is good.
That's right. You need a sharp lens, good technique, and an attractive model.
Nice lighting on the face, but perhaps a bit overblown over her shoulder. Well positioned stare, not directly at the camera.
Regards
Sam-Joseph
Pentax K7, Sigma 17-70 f2.8-4.5, Sigma 70-200 f2.8 APO EX, Sigma 70-300 APO, Sigma 1.4x TC, Vivitar 2x TC. Takumar 135mm f2.5, SMC Pentax A 50mm 1:1.7, SMC Pentax -M 1:4 200mm, Pentax X70