In The Water
This is a blended image, five exposures done as a mild HDR Fusion in Photomatix, then the mild HDR version blended with the most even of the five normal exposures and the opacity adjusted to achieve the most natural result I could.
K-3, 12-24, Polariser, Tripod, dedication, hard work, love, a bit of artistry(?), a bit of vision. Thanks to Pentax for giving us such superb equipment.
Best
Bill
BillWardPhotography

Best Regards, Larry.
All the gear & no idea.


I don't miss anything in this image - a pleasure to look at! Superiour 😃😃😃
View large
Malc
I've never done any HDR blending so please excuse my question. Why would you not include all images in the initial Photomatix blend, rather than adding the most even one (again ?) afterwards ?
Many thanks
Nigel
Best regards
Nigel
www.nigelstridephotography.co.uk
This is a cracking shot, David. In my view, it's what HDR should be about - a result that looks realistic and still pleasing to the eye.
I've never done any HDR blending so please excuse my question. Why would you not include all images in the initial Photomatix blend, rather than adding the most even one (again ?) afterwards ?
Many thanks
Nigel
Hi Nigel
The Photomatix blend, no matter how mild or carefully processed, to my eye looks a bit artificial. For this reason, I chose to do a final blend of the Photomatix image with the 'normal image' out of the original five that had the most even tones. In the final blended version I kept the aspects of the HDR image that made it work, e.g. the detail in the sky, but erased or partially erased much of the foreground. I think the result is pretty close to what I was seeing at the time and is certainly the best I can do with a shot that contained some savage dynamic range that would have been impossible to reproduce in 1 shot.
Regards
David
Flickr
Nicola's Apartments, Kassiopi, Corfu
Some cameras, some lenses, some bits 'n' bobs
Kind regards Maria

https://www.facebook.com/pages/Maria-Gray-photography/589310071158079?ref=hl
This is a cracking shot, David. In my view, it's what HDR should be about - a result that looks realistic and still pleasing to the eye.
I've never done any HDR blending so please excuse my question. Why would you not include all images in the initial Photomatix blend, rather than adding the most even one (again ?) afterwards ?
Many thanks
Nigel
Hi Nigel
The Photomatix blend, no matter how mild or carefully processed, to my eye looks a bit artificial. For this reason, I chose to do a final blend of the Photomatix image with the 'normal image' out of the original five that had the most even tones. In the final blended version I kept the aspects of the HDR image that made it work, e.g. the detail in the sky, but erased or partially erased much of the foreground. I think the result is pretty close to what I was seeing at the time and is certainly the best I can do with a shot that contained some savage dynamic range that would have been impossible to reproduce in 1 shot.
Regards
David
Thanks for the explanation - much appreciated

Best regards
Nigel
www.nigelstridephotography.co.uk
drobbia
9 yearsMember
California, USA
"It's not what you look at that's important, it's what you see" - Thoreau