Great tit


Photo Information
24/03/2009 - 10:28aminstar
CategoryWildlife / Nature
Shutter Speed1/350
Aperturef/4.5
LensN/A
ISO560
Focal Length300mm
Views/Likes43/0

scottthehat

Link Posted 24/03/2009 - 10:44
lovely shot amin, nice and sharp lots of detail of the greattit,
just keep snapping,

http://www.pentaxphotogallery.com/scottbenson

http://s727.photobucket.com/albums/ww272/scottthehat/


CAMERAS = k200d + battery grip.
nikon d300 + battery grip.
LENSES = tamron aspherical DII 18-200mm f3.5/6.3,
nikon 18-200mm afs vr f3.5/5.6 g dx
sigma 150-500mm apo dg hsm os
sigma 170-500mm apo dg
FLASH = samsung sef36pzf flash + more.

beginner

Link Posted 24/03/2009 - 11:08
As a bird photographer Amin "You have arrived!".....,,,only thing wrong is your choice of aperture!....you have lost some detail in the feathers using such a narrow Dof!....5.6 OR 6.7 would have made all the difference,but thats just practice!....next time shoot the same shot at different apertures and see what you think,it is after all just a turn of the wheel!...........all the best........Ken
K20D...ist DS ,DA18/55,DA16/45.DA* 50/135,"A"1.7 50MM..."A" 70/210..M 50mm f2...Tamron 90mm macro,28/300 Tamron,200/500 Tamron 6.9....A Pentax DA*300... Sigma10/20,FA31mm 1.8 Ltd*********,FA 77mm Ltd!

aminstar

Link Posted 24/03/2009 - 11:21
Ken
Thanks very much for your advice . That is a real boost hearing a vote of confidence from someone who has such a respectful portfolio.
I will keep a closer eye on the aperture from now on and try to improve the shots. I was constantly concentrating on the iso and the shutter speed and specially the high iso which was getting to me and ruining my shots. But thanks to Stefan's advice who pointed me to the Topaz Denoise I seem to be able to control noise during post processing, so I will give it a go as you mention ken and hope to get a better focusing overall .
Thanks for your advice, looking forward to apply it now
Amin Photo Gallery

beginner

Link Posted 24/03/2009 - 11:36
"De-Noise!".......thats the reason for the definition loss on the body!....I thought it was just out of focus!....silly me!....I never use new fangled gadgetry.. I'm just old fashioned!.......Ken
K20D...ist DS ,DA18/55,DA16/45.DA* 50/135,"A"1.7 50MM..."A" 70/210..M 50mm f2...Tamron 90mm macro,28/300 Tamron,200/500 Tamron 6.9....A Pentax DA*300... Sigma10/20,FA31mm 1.8 Ltd*********,FA 77mm Ltd!

aminstar

Link Posted 24/03/2009 - 11:45
beginner wrote:
"De-Noise!".......thats the reason for the definition loss on the body!....I thought it was just out of focus!....silly me!....I never use new fangled gadgetry.. I'm just old fashioned!.......Ken

You have got a sharp eye Ken, I must give that one to you .
You are absolutely right, again , I struggled between leaving the high noise on this image and losing the bit of definition on the body, but my oh my, your sharp eye picked on that huh? . Good one ken. One more reason I keep bugging you and the likes of you for help on improvement, I get a fast track to good learning from you all
Amin Photo Gallery
Add a Comment
You must be registered or logged-in to comment.