Botanical Flower, no. 2
Photo Information
After all your lovely comments, and helpful tips, I have brightened up and cropped another one of these lovely flowers, hope you like them, any comments gratefully accepted. Cheers Trixie 18/04/2011 - 19:40trixie
CategoryFlowers & plants
LensN/A
ISO200
Focal Length18mm
Views/Likes46/0
Link
Posted 18/04/2011 - 19:48
A fine effort, looks like you've got the lighting, focus and DOF on the flowers sorted on this, well taken.
Did you use multi-segment or centre weighted metering as the exif data isn't showing? I only ask because of the bright highlights in the background.
Great simplicity is only won by an intense moment or by years of intelligent effort. T.S Eliot
PPG
Gear Not enough!!
Flickr
My not so new website
Did you use multi-segment or centre weighted metering as the exif data isn't showing? I only ask because of the bright highlights in the background.
Great simplicity is only won by an intense moment or by years of intelligent effort. T.S Eliot
PPG
Gear Not enough!!
Flickr
My not so new website
Link
Posted 18/04/2011 - 20:05
sandinista wrote:
A fine effort, looks like you've got the lighting, focus and DOF on the flowers sorted on this, well taken.
Did you use multi-segment or centre weighted metering as the exif data isn't showing? I only ask because of the bright highlights in the background.
A fine effort, looks like you've got the lighting, focus and DOF on the flowers sorted on this, well taken.
Did you use multi-segment or centre weighted metering as the exif data isn't showing? I only ask because of the bright highlights in the background.
Hi Jim I'll get back to you with the info, I'll have to look back at the original photo thanks for your interest. Cheers Trixie
Link
Posted 18/04/2011 - 20:14
sandinista wrote:
A fine effort, looks like you've got the lighting, focus and DOF on the flowers sorted on this, well taken.
Did you use multi-segment or centre weighted metering as the exif data isn't showing? I only ask because of the bright highlights in the background.
A fine effort, looks like you've got the lighting, focus and DOF on the flowers sorted on this, well taken.
Did you use multi-segment or centre weighted metering as the exif data isn't showing? I only ask because of the bright highlights in the background.
Hi Jim, I used Aperture priority, 200 speed ISO, and I had the white balance set at cloudy, and I used centre weight. I think the bright lights was a shaft of sun just coming through the trees for a few moments. I have only cropped this photo and just slightly adjusted the colour balance in paintshop pro. Thanks for asking and your lovely comments Cheers Trixie
Link
Posted 18/04/2011 - 20:17
GIULIO57 wrote:
Glad you like it. xxx:
Link
Posted 18/04/2011 - 21:20
That's very lovely again Trixie, i like the light on the flowers
Kind regards Maria
https://www.facebook.com/pages/Maria-Gray-photography/589310071158079?ref=hl
Kind regards Maria
https://www.facebook.com/pages/Maria-Gray-photography/589310071158079?ref=hl
Link
Posted 18/04/2011 - 21:35
autumnlight wrote:
That's very lovely again Trixie, i like the light on the flowers
That's very lovely again Trixie, i like the light on the flowers
Thank you Maria, and I loved your Stags Horn photo, I have used this plant in Homeopathy, its useful and beautiful, Cheers Trixie
Link
Posted 18/04/2011 - 22:47
Hi Patricia,
I’m OK about DOF quality. But I wonder how is it necessary for your pic. I think rose blossoming foreground makes up the main interest of your pic. Why do not isolate it further with narrower aperture then ? I’d opt for f8, even f10
cheers,
senn
my flickr gallery
my PPG
I’m OK about DOF quality. But I wonder how is it necessary for your pic. I think rose blossoming foreground makes up the main interest of your pic. Why do not isolate it further with narrower aperture then ? I’d opt for f8, even f10
cheers,
senn
my flickr gallery
my PPG
Last Edited by senn on 18/04/2011 - 22:47
Link
Posted 19/04/2011 - 07:44
senn wrote:
Hi Patricia,
I’m OK about DOF quality. But I wonder how is it necessary for your pic. I think rose blossoming foreground makes up the main interest of your pic. Why do not isolate it further with narrower aperture then ? I’d opt for f8, even f10
cheers,
Hi Patricia,
I’m OK about DOF quality. But I wonder how is it necessary for your pic. I think rose blossoming foreground makes up the main interest of your pic. Why do not isolate it further with narrower aperture then ? I’d opt for f8, even f10
cheers,
Thank you Senn, I will try what you suggest, look at for the redone photo, cheers trixie
Link
Posted 19/04/2011 - 17:08
Add a Comment
You must be registered or logged-in to comment.
GIULIO57
13 yearsMember
Firenze-Italia
PPG