worth upgrade k5IIs to K-3
Posted 26/11/2014 - 19:53
Link
Mike-P wrote:
Edit: I do wish I didn't have to scroll all the way down the page every time I post something, it's getting up my nose now.
Edit: I do wish I didn't have to scroll all the way down the page every time I post something, it's getting up my nose now.
For anyone using a PC keyboard, the "Home" and "End" keys take you instantly to the top and bottom of the page resp.
Cheers.
Philip
Posted 26/11/2014 - 22:09
Link
MrB wrote:
For anyone using a PC keyboard, the "Home" and "End" keys take you instantly to the top and bottom of the page resp.
For anyone using a PC keyboard, the "Home" and "End" keys take you instantly to the top and bottom of the page resp.
Before the update you would just type in your reply on a thread and once the add comment/preview button was clicked you would instantly be taken to your post. Now you get taken to the top of the page and have to scroll down to your post which is a right pain, especially if you are getting near the end of the page.
Posted 26/11/2014 - 22:36
Link
Mike-P wrote:
Before the update you would just type in your reply on a thread and once the add comment/preview button was clicked you would instantly be taken to your post. Now you get taken to the top of the page and have to scroll down to your post which is a right pain, especially if you are getting near the end of the page.
MrB wrote:
For anyone using a PC keyboard, the "Home" and "End" keys take you instantly to the top and bottom of the page resp.
For anyone using a PC keyboard, the "Home" and "End" keys take you instantly to the top and bottom of the page resp.
Before the update you would just type in your reply on a thread and once the add comment/preview button was clicked you would instantly be taken to your post. Now you get taken to the top of the page and have to scroll down to your post which is a right pain, especially if you are getting near the end of the page.
I know - I've done quite a few posts. I was just trying to offer a quicker way of getting to either end of a long page (rather than by scrolling), which might be helpful to some members.
Cheers.
Philip.
Posted 26/11/2014 - 22:44
Link
bwlchmawr wrote:
It's not just me then... I was beginning to think I was imagining things.
Mike-P wrote:
I have to say my favourite at low ISO was the sensor from the K10D.
.
I have to say my favourite at low ISO was the sensor from the K10D.
.
It's not just me then... I was beginning to think I was imagining things.
Both my *istD and K10D are keepers. As I have said before, there is just something about a CCD sensor that comes across in the images.
Best regards
pixels don't make pictures
Posted 04/02/2015 - 17:24
Link
50mpCMOS wrote:
[quoteI also find the WB a bit awkward to get right on aerial images]
This brings up a few questions for myself...
1. Have you noticed it with just one lens or a variety of lenses?
2. Since I use filters myself; do you happen to use filters as well?
3. Since you mentioned aerial; I'm assuming they were taken from an aerial platform such as (perhaps) a private plane.
In reference to item three; and to the general audience. I would strongly suggest that anyone ever shooting photographs from items such as: a plane, a boat, even a vehicle in general... To make sure to turn off any and all forms of SR/image stabilization. Cannot begin to mention how many cameras I've seen damaged by this
[quoteI also find the WB a bit awkward to get right on aerial images]
This brings up a few questions for myself...
1. Have you noticed it with just one lens or a variety of lenses?
2. Since I use filters myself; do you happen to use filters as well?
3. Since you mentioned aerial; I'm assuming they were taken from an aerial platform such as (perhaps) a private plane.
In reference to item three; and to the general audience. I would strongly suggest that anyone ever shooting photographs from items such as: a plane, a boat, even a vehicle in general... To make sure to turn off any and all forms of SR/image stabilization. Cannot begin to mention how many cameras I've seen damaged by this
Sorry I know this is an older post but I was suprised that this statement about "no SR in moving vehicle or camera gets damaged" did not get any comments. This is new to me and I do not find any mention of it in Pentax manuals etc.
Pentax K-30, Tamron 17-50mm, Pentax 55-300. Assortment of Pentax M:s.
Posted 04/02/2015 - 17:50
Link
Quote:
Cannot begin to mention how many cameras I've seen damaged by this
Cannot begin to mention how many cameras I've seen damaged by this
I think the answer to that would be "none", probably nobody thought a response was necessary?
Best regards, John
Posted 04/02/2015 - 19:48
Link
My cameras must be wrecks then, having used them on boats big and small, in aircraft, and in cars, not to mention a couple of dog sleds .
Add Comment
To leave a comment - Log in to Pentax User or create a new account.
2342 posts
14 years
Storbritannia
Well after having the K10D, K20D, K-5, K-5II, K-3 and back to a K-5IIs (because I think the K-3 sucks) I have to say my favourite at low ISO was the sensor from the K10D.
Could have saved myself a sackful of cash ... although I guess nowhere near as much as Jules if he had stuck with his first camera. :twisted
Edit: I do wish I didn't have to scroll all the way down the page every time I post something, it's getting up my nose now.
Well if the K3 sucks the 7D MkII blows!
Really wish I'd kept my K3 but I'm over the moon is eventually saw sense and was able to get it back!
My viewfinder is 576,000,000 pixels.
My other viewfinder is 5.76,000,000.
www.exaggeratedperspectives.com