Which is best, film or digital?
- You need to be logged in to vote on this poll
If you buy a used spanish car you can guarantee that the indicator stalk will be pristine and as new. Plenty of scrapes on the outside though due to their automatic touch sensors for parking.
If the car behind or in front moves, then they've touched it and have worked out the fore and aft boundaries of their parking space. Simples, who needs ultrasonic assisted parking? Not the spanish.
Peter E Smith
My flickr Photostream
In Spain, it seems Audi drivers have a special dispensation to drive at least 25Kmh faster than anybody else on any road. I stick to the 120 Kmh limit on motorways but 90% of the vehicles that pass me are Audi, some considerably faster.
But we digress. Digital is better, move on . . .
Ha ha! I commented on this to my wife a few weeks ago on a trip. I am very familiar with the tactic of cars coming right up behind you when you're already at 120 and waiting until you get out of their way, but I have noticed that the majority are Audis, and most of them are A3s.
I can understand the photography "old hands" rejoicing in digital, it is so much easier to manage. But I like film despite it's challenges - I think it's much more difficult to use now than it was back then due to scarcity of services.
Pentax hybrid user - Digital K3, film 645 and 35mm SLR and Pentax (&other) lenses adapted to Fuji X and Panasonic L digital
Fan of DA limited and old manual lenses
Best regards, John
MattyH
Member
Staffordshire Moorlands
Gone and done this due to 1. This tread, 2. A set of outstanding photos on the your photo thread, And 3. To finally put, in my mind, film finally to bed.
As for the BMW, AUDI debate I would also own neither as I like a car to come with indicators and not as an optional extra.