What settings do you think this photographer used?
4,328 posts
Link
Posted 26/05/2017 - 01:01
According to him, he uses medium format film, with a long exposure, usually 2-4 seconds, sometimes up to 10.
Peter
My Flickr page
Peter
My Flickr page
Link
Posted 26/05/2017 - 07:34
Oh thanks didn't notice that the info was already there. I'll experiment more then
Last Edited by sebas77 on 26/05/2017 - 07:34
Link
Posted 26/05/2017 - 18:46
It also looks a bit like a multiple exposure to me, one long exposure and one shorter? Might be wrong but it looks a bit suspicious that many of the people are almost static, whilst others have made long trails. I don't think that would happen in a busy place where there is obviously a lot of constant movement.
Regards
David
Flickr
Nicola's Apartments, Kassiopi, Corfu
Some cameras, some lenses, some bits 'n' bobs
Regards
David
Flickr
Nicola's Apartments, Kassiopi, Corfu
Some cameras, some lenses, some bits 'n' bobs
Link
Posted 26/05/2017 - 19:51
Yes that's what I thought it's fishy
Link
Posted 29/05/2017 - 02:57
Yeah, looks like multiple photos to me too. You can tell by the length of some of the trails that one exposure had to be several seconds (I'd guess 5s). The second exposure was much shorter (1/15s?) because the figures are slightly unsharp, indicative of long/non freezing shutter speed. Clever shot!
... just another middle-aged guy with a hobby. I have an extreme macro learning site at extreme-macro.co.uk - Pentax-centric, your feedback and comments would be appreciated!
... just another middle-aged guy with a hobby. I have an extreme macro learning site at extreme-macro.co.uk - Pentax-centric, your feedback and comments would be appreciated!
Link
Posted 02/06/2017 - 22:44
I have another better example here:
I highlighted an object that is repeated several times in the exposition. If this was a simple long exposition, there is no way that object would have been visibile. Thoughts?
I highlighted an object that is repeated several times in the exposition. If this was a simple long exposition, there is no way that object would have been visibile. Thoughts?
Link
Posted 02/06/2017 - 22:59
The hand would have been periodically static as the stair were climbed. The exposure I'd guess would be around a second a step, thus about 7 seconds. The hand may have been in one spot long enough to register. Certainly an interesting experiment.
John K
John K
Link
Posted 03/06/2017 - 06:52
I can't tell for sure because I didn't do enough experimentation but for the little I have done with seven seconds the person just disappears from the exposure because the background is exposed for much longer and will eat the moving person exposure.
Last Edited by sebas77 on 03/06/2017 - 06:53
Add a Comment
You must be registered or logged-in to comment.
sebas77
Member
Southsea
https://www.lensculture.com/network/gallery?modal=project-350332-2028537
either the exposition is too short (not such a long trail) or too long (they disappear, but also everyone would be blurry!)
do you think he composes multiple photos?