The grass isn't always greener....?
It just confirms that nothing manufactured is perfect and free from all possible defects. And that things manufactured can and do fail.
Best regards, John
Best regards
And who'd want a camera that uses CF cards?
Any one who owns an istD or anyone who owns a high res, high frame rate DSLR as CF has a faster write speed that SD.
Best regards
...anyone who owns a high res, high frame rate DSLR as CF has a faster write speed that SD.
...but a little concerning at the number of bent pin repairs needed to such cameras...
Are SD cards really that much slower (now)?
...anyone who owns a high res, high frame rate DSLR as CF has a faster write speed that SD.
Best regards
...but a little concerning at the number of bent pin repairs needed to such cameras...
Are SD cards really that much slower (now)?
There are thousands out there in use without issue. I suspect that without the link, you would never have heard about it.
Best regards
With the SD card, the weak point is the lock switch. These can and do get bent so they fracture.
Best regards, John
To be fair, looking at the design of the CF card we could surmise that pins will get bent.
Not so John. The design criteria is solid. As long as the assembly is manufactured to the specifications it ensures correct alignment of the card with the pins. The card face has lead in tapers that accommodate any minor pin off centres. This is a method that is also used in the measurement and control industry.
Poor selection of pin array or guide tolerance deviations by a manufacturer is more likely the reason. Basically down to cost savings.
Best regards
To be fair, looking at the design of the CF card we could surmise that pins will get bent.
Not so John. The design criteria is solid. As long as the assembly is manufactured to the specifications it ensures correct alignment of the card with the pins. The card face has lead in tapers that accommodate any minor pin off centres. This is a method that is also used in the measurement and control industry.
Poor selection of pin array or guide tolerance deviations by a manufacturer is more likely the reason. Basically down to cost savings.
Best regards
So, if the fundamental design of CF cards,etc, is not the issue, I presume it must be badly designed or manufactured cameras?
If you look at the recent issues that Alien Grove has had and take that as standard, you'd never dare change a lens on a K5. My broken 16-50 SDM could not be repaired according to Pentax Japan so I had to buy another.
What's the point of service and support?
Manufacturers are not in the repair business, any defect early on will be rectified through due process. It's only the faithful early buyers that get stung if there is an issue.
I use three systems of DSLR's and three systems of non DSLR's and to date have had no actual failures of kit. My faults are down to me dropping or crashing lenses/bodies into much harder objects. They are tools and therefore replaceable.
Best regards
JohnX
Member
South London
And who'd want a camera that uses CF cards?
http://www.lensrentals.com/blog/2012/09/lensrentals-repair-data-january-july-201...