Supplementing my K-7 in low light; K-r or K-x?
I have no experience of the Kr but I did try the K5 at 'Focus on Imaging' last year.....WOW!
I don't think you'll be disappointed if you go for the Kx,
I did see a Kr kit on e - bay for £310 yesterday....
Regards, Michael

Regards,
Michael
My new website:link
Sounds like the Kx will do the job nicely though


Yeah I had a look at a K5 in a shop and I was like omfg... the zoom-on-AF lock feature is AMAZING as well.
Sounds like the Kx will do the job nicely though


If you have a BestBuy locally, try that - ours had one in its fire-sale with std kit lens for £315 last week-end, but I think it will probably come down from that as it is the sole "orphan" Pentax in the display and no-one seemed to be taking any interest in it

K-3 II, K-3 and a K-70 from SRS

(I like the tight film-like grain of the K7 tho).
Now... I happen to have a blue K-x for sale. But I'm not giving it away for the above reason. £260.
Facebook Page
Plymouth Photographer
mdc
Member
UK
With that in mind, which would be better as a cheap alternative to the K7, the Kx or the Kr? I've heard the Kr is slightly better than the Kx, and the K5 slightly better than that, but I'm guessing that the Kx is several orders of magnitude less noisy than the K7 anyway, and it'd be the cheapest of the two, so... is my logic right?