some shots of my guitar
Posted 19/06/2010 - 14:21
Link
They're terribly dark but perhaps that was your intention using soot and a black reflector.
What was your actual light source?
What was your actual light source?
Ken
“We must avoid however, snapping away, shooting quickly and without thought, overloading ourselves with unnecessary images that clutter our memory and diminish the clarity of the whole.” - Henri Cartier-Bresson -
“We must avoid however, snapping away, shooting quickly and without thought, overloading ourselves with unnecessary images that clutter our memory and diminish the clarity of the whole.” - Henri Cartier-Bresson -
Posted 19/06/2010 - 14:35
Link
I agree they are dark. Also on the third one the focus point seems to be either the last couple of frets or the top element (hard to tell on my monitor) which leaves the bulk of the photo out of focus. I don't like that. Shallow depth of field fine, but to have the focus point so far to the right just feels wrong.
The first one works the best for me, though the reflection of the string on the scratch plate is distracting.
The first one works the best for me, though the reflection of the string on the scratch plate is distracting.
Posted 19/06/2010 - 14:38
Link
Just too dark to tell what's what ?? Why this dark ??
p.s. strings need changing
p.s. strings need changing
Stu - K10D | DFA 100/2.8 Macro | DA 55-300 | AF-360FGZ |
So much to learn... So little time !
Posted 19/06/2010 - 18:47
Link
Hi Matthew,
I took the liberty of copying one of these and having a go at it in Photoshop. It needed quite a lot of work in levels, too much really as the file was underexposed in camera. Do check your histogram after each shot and reshoot if there's not a nice spread of tones.
The amount of levelling I had to do introduced a lot of noise which you can avoid in the future.
I also sharpened the image and finally added a border.
Don't worry about making errors. Everyone does, all the time, and it's actually a good way to learn! If I were you, I'd try to repeat this exercise taking great care with focusing, lighting and ensuring the camera is really still so as to avoid movement. I'm sure you'll do better second time around

I took the liberty of copying one of these and having a go at it in Photoshop. It needed quite a lot of work in levels, too much really as the file was underexposed in camera. Do check your histogram after each shot and reshoot if there's not a nice spread of tones.
The amount of levelling I had to do introduced a lot of noise which you can avoid in the future.
I also sharpened the image and finally added a border.
Don't worry about making errors. Everyone does, all the time, and it's actually a good way to learn! If I were you, I'd try to repeat this exercise taking great care with focusing, lighting and ensuring the camera is really still so as to avoid movement. I'm sure you'll do better second time around

Best wishes,
Andrew
"These places mean something and it's the job of a photographer to figure-out what the hell it is."
Robert Adams
"The camera doesn't make a bit of difference. All of them can record what you are seeing. But, you have to SEE."
Ernst Hass
My website: http://www.ephotozine.com/user/bwlchmawr-199050 http://s927.photobucket.com/home/ADC3440/index
https://www.flickr.com/photos/78898196@N05
Andrew
"These places mean something and it's the job of a photographer to figure-out what the hell it is."
Robert Adams
"The camera doesn't make a bit of difference. All of them can record what you are seeing. But, you have to SEE."
Ernst Hass
My website: http://www.ephotozine.com/user/bwlchmawr-199050 http://s927.photobucket.com/home/ADC3440/index
https://www.flickr.com/photos/78898196@N05
Posted 19/06/2010 - 21:30
Link
I'll be interested to hear from Matt why he chose to have them so dark. I doubt that it's a mistake as he's clearly thought carefully before posting.
That said I feel they are too dark - although if viewed on black they may look different?
Mike
That said I feel they are too dark - although if viewed on black they may look different?
Mike
---------------------------------------------------
You can see some of my shots at my Flickr account.
You can see some of my shots at my Flickr account.
Posted 20/06/2010 - 07:41
Link
I like 'em... moody shot's of a classic stratt , but I do say clone out the reflection of the whammy bar . Andrew your version has a nice gritty 60 s feel to it . Or is it just me...Jeff BTW what's a soot ?
Posted 20/06/2010 - 09:50
Link
Posted 20/06/2010 - 10:33
Link
Posted 20/06/2010 - 11:11
Link
I like this one better, but to be really picky I'd like to see more of the body curve highlighted. As it is it is a fine photo of strings, a couple of elements and a whammy bar, but the Strat is a very curvy, sexy guitar and it needs those curves showing.
The depth of field is still shallow too so that the tone knob is in focus whilst the bulk of the photo isn't. Unless it's my eyes of course, which is quite possible .
The depth of field is still shallow too so that the tone knob is in focus whilst the bulk of the photo isn't. Unless it's my eyes of course, which is quite possible .
Posted 20/06/2010 - 13:21
Link
Posted 20/06/2010 - 16:31
Link
The first of the new ones I like very much but I think Gwyn is right about showing more outline curves, the second is well lit but just a touch over exposed, the highlights are starting to blow; if the original is OK I'd be inclined just to pull the highlights back a little
Ken
“We must avoid however, snapping away, shooting quickly and without thought, overloading ourselves with unnecessary images that clutter our memory and diminish the clarity of the whole.” - Henri Cartier-Bresson -
“We must avoid however, snapping away, shooting quickly and without thought, overloading ourselves with unnecessary images that clutter our memory and diminish the clarity of the whole.” - Henri Cartier-Bresson -
Posted 20/06/2010 - 18:01
Link
Both a big improvement. Particularly the first one! What progress!
Best wishes,
Andrew
"These places mean something and it's the job of a photographer to figure-out what the hell it is."
Robert Adams
"The camera doesn't make a bit of difference. All of them can record what you are seeing. But, you have to SEE."
Ernst Hass
My website: http://www.ephotozine.com/user/bwlchmawr-199050 http://s927.photobucket.com/home/ADC3440/index
https://www.flickr.com/photos/78898196@N05
Andrew
"These places mean something and it's the job of a photographer to figure-out what the hell it is."
Robert Adams
"The camera doesn't make a bit of difference. All of them can record what you are seeing. But, you have to SEE."
Ernst Hass
My website: http://www.ephotozine.com/user/bwlchmawr-199050 http://s927.photobucket.com/home/ADC3440/index
https://www.flickr.com/photos/78898196@N05
Add Comment
To leave a comment - Log in to Pentax User or create a new account.
28 posts
15 years
But I suppose it's a requirement for growth.............SO here gose
lighting was one soot and a mirror with a black reflector
Camera set to manual and room blacked out
Matt