SMC M Glass a love affair of 35 years
Posted 29/05/2015 - 22:05
Link
The M100/2.8 is absolutely superb - I've owned several and they've all produced top IQ. I parted with my last one recently knowing that I still have the A version which is identical apart from the 'A' setting and the built-in hood.
LennyBloke
Posted 29/05/2015 - 22:13
Link
M28 F3.5, a fantastic landscape lens.
Regards
David
Regards
David
Posted 29/05/2015 - 22:26
Link
The M 200 f4 is well worth the low price they fetch.
Classic Pentax M, compact and beautifully built. Definitely worth adding to you bag!
Classic Pentax M, compact and beautifully built. Definitely worth adding to you bag!
Bob
Posted 29/05/2015 - 22:33
Link
LennyBloke wrote:
The M100/2.8 is absolutely superb - I've owned several and they've all produced top IQ. I parted with my last one recently knowing that I still have the A version which is identical apart from the 'A' setting and the built-in hood.
The M100/2.8 is absolutely superb - I've owned several and they've all produced top IQ. I parted with my last one recently knowing that I still have the A version which is identical apart from the 'A' setting and the built-in hood.
will keep my eye out for a 100/2.8
Posted 29/05/2015 - 22:33
Link
davidstorm wrote:
M28 F3.5, a fantastic landscape lens.
Regards
David
M28 F3.5, a fantastic landscape lens.
Regards
David
l have heard it is sharper than the 28/2.8
Posted 29/05/2015 - 22:34
Link
Stuey wrote:
I have the 28/3.5 and 200/4 and love both of them
I have sets on flickr for both
I have the 28/3.5 and 200/4 and love both of them
I have sets on flickr for both
just missed a cheep nice condition 200/4 on ebay the other day
Posted 29/05/2015 - 22:35
Link
doingthebobs wrote:
The M 200 f4 is well worth the low price they fetch.
Classic Pentax M, compact and beautifully built. Definitely worth adding to you bag!
The M 200 f4 is well worth the low price they fetch.
Classic Pentax M, compact and beautifully built. Definitely worth adding to you bag!
most definately will add a 200/4 to my lens group
Posted 29/05/2015 - 22:36
Link
Do people tend to shoot their M glass on film bodies these days or on digital bodies?
Posted 29/05/2015 - 22:45
Link
lxmike wrote:
Do people tend to shoot their M glass on film bodies these days or on digital bodies?
Do people tend to shoot their M glass on film bodies these days or on digital bodies?
To my shame I've given up on film quite a while ago But M on D can produce some superb results
LennyBloke
Posted 29/05/2015 - 22:58
Link
LennyBloke wrote:
To my shame I've given up on film quite a while ago But M on D can produce some superb results
lxmike wrote:
Do people tend to shoot their M glass on film bodies these days or on digital bodies?
Do people tend to shoot their M glass on film bodies these days or on digital bodies?
To my shame I've given up on film quite a while ago But M on D can produce some superb results
nothing to be ashamed of, as long as your still using pentax,
Posted 30/05/2015 - 00:49
Link
lxmike wrote:
Do people tend to shoot their M glass on film bodies these days or on digital bodies?
Do people tend to shoot their M glass on film bodies these days or on digital bodies?
Both. And another vote for the M100/2.8. K.
Kris Lockyear
It is an illusion that photos are made with the camera… they are made with the eye, heart and head. Henri Cartier-Bresson
Lots of film bodies, a couple of digital ones, too many lenses (mainly older glass) and a Horseman LE 5x4.
It is an illusion that photos are made with the camera… they are made with the eye, heart and head. Henri Cartier-Bresson
Lots of film bodies, a couple of digital ones, too many lenses (mainly older glass) and a Horseman LE 5x4.
Posted 30/05/2015 - 08:51
Link
The 100mm f/2.8 was one of my favourite lenses, so it came as no surprise when I really liked the 70mm f/2.4 on digital.
Best regards, John
Add Comment
To leave a comment - Log in to Pentax User or create a new account.
173 posts
10 years
north east england