Sigma 18-300mm f/3.5-6.3 DC Macro OS HSM Contemporary - Pentax Fit - OS or not OS?
Posted 07/10/2016 - 10:49
Link
https://www.sigmaphoto.com/18-300mm-f35-63-dc-macro-os-hsm-c.
They say Sony and Pentax have no OS option. Which, with in body OS, makes sense.
They say Sony and Pentax have no OS option. Which, with in body OS, makes sense.
'Photography...it remembers little things, long after you have forgotten....' (Aaron Siskind)
Posted 07/10/2016 - 11:32
Link
Yep, optical stabilization built into a lens intended for a Pentax camera would be redundant, so third-party lens-makers understandably leave it out of variants of their lenses designed for attachment to a Pentax (while frequently building OS in to variants destined for Nikon, Canon etc).
Posted 07/10/2016 - 11:44
Link
CMW wrote:
Yep, optical stabilization built into a lens intended for a Pentax camera would be redundant, so third-party lens-makers understandably leave it out of variants of their lenses designed for attachment to a Pentax (while frequently building OS in to variants destined for Nikon, Canon etc).
Yep, optical stabilization built into a lens intended for a Pentax camera would be redundant, so third-party lens-makers understandably leave it out of variants of their lenses designed for attachment to a Pentax (while frequently building OS in to variants destined for Nikon, Canon etc).
They don't always, the Sigma 150 - 500 still had OS in the lens. It had an advantage over the Pentax OS system, in that the viewfinder image was also stabilized
Barrie - Too Old To Die Young
https://pentaxphotogallery.com/artists/barrieforbes
https://www.flickr.com/photos/189482630@N03/
https://pentaxphotogallery.com/artists/barrieforbes
https://www.flickr.com/photos/189482630@N03/
Posted 07/10/2016 - 11:51
Link
Happy to be corrected. I hadn't thought of the benefit of stabilization of the viewfinder image -- certainly useful, I imagine, for longer lenses than those I tend to use.
Posted 07/10/2016 - 11:57
Link
CMW wrote:
Happy to be corrected. I hadn't thought of the benefit of stabilization of the viewfinder image -- certainly useful, I imagine, for longer lenses than those I tend to use.
Happy to be corrected. I hadn't thought of the benefit of stabilization of the viewfinder image -- certainly useful, I imagine, for longer lenses than those I tend to use.
You may well be correct about the latest third party lenses, the 150-500 was a while ago now.
Barrie - Too Old To Die Young
https://pentaxphotogallery.com/artists/barrieforbes
https://www.flickr.com/photos/189482630@N03/
https://pentaxphotogallery.com/artists/barrieforbes
https://www.flickr.com/photos/189482630@N03/
Posted 07/10/2016 - 12:21
Link
Yes that's why I was a little confused because I have the Sigma 150-500 lens and yes I am able to choose either OS system when using that lens, obviously only one or the other. It does indeed have the advantage of seeing a stabilised image in the viewfinder as well when using Sigma OS.
I did ask Park Cameras about this as they dont mention it on their website but their reply was less than useful.
Stuart
I did ask Park Cameras about this as they dont mention it on their website but their reply was less than useful.
Stuart
Posted 07/10/2016 - 13:45
Link
I'd try SRS, usually great service
Barrie - Too Old To Die Young
https://pentaxphotogallery.com/artists/barrieforbes
https://www.flickr.com/photos/189482630@N03/
https://pentaxphotogallery.com/artists/barrieforbes
https://www.flickr.com/photos/189482630@N03/
Add Comment
To leave a comment - Log in to Pentax User or create a new account.
49 posts
11 years
So my question is who is correct? Does anyone know for sure who is right for a Pentax fit lens?
Stuart