preparing for patagonia
Posted 11/01/2013 - 11:05
Link
I was in exactly the same situation with an upcoming trip. I had the DA* 300mm for a while which is a great, if pricey, lens, but found the weight excessive, especially for traveling. I now have the DA 55-300mm instead. It's heaps better than anything else in the price range - you should be able to pick up a good used one for around £190 or so. The 50-200 is nice, but not on a par with the 55-300mm and the extra reach is useful. It's relatively small and portable as well - another bonus for traveling.
Amazon at £225 is the best new price at the moment, I think
Amazon at £225 is the best new price at the moment, I think
Posted 11/01/2013 - 11:42
Link
That will be fantastic. A 50-200WR could be useful in Patagonia. Otherwise 55-300 for IQ. Good IQ for the price and not much money to risk in a rugged environment. I'm about to sell mine. Because it has a replacement Chinese hood I'll be knocking a fair few quid off the price, let me know if you're interested.
Posted 11/01/2013 - 11:46
Link
I love my 55-300 - prob my joint fave lens for my pentax kit
- -
Mike
Pentax K5 / Pentax K5 11/ Pentax K200D / Canon Rebel T1 i / Canon 650D / Pentax MX-1 / Fuji XF1 /Fuji X 10 / Canon EOS-M / Canon G10/ Pentax Mz-7 x 2
Mike
Pentax K5 / Pentax K5 11/ Pentax K200D / Canon Rebel T1 i / Canon 650D / Pentax MX-1 / Fuji XF1 /Fuji X 10 / Canon EOS-M / Canon G10/ Pentax Mz-7 x 2
Posted 11/01/2013 - 11:46
Link
DrOrloff wrote:
That will be fantastic. A 50-200WR could be useful in Patagonia. Otherwise 55-300 for IQ. Good IQ for the price and not much money to risk in a rugged environment. I'm about to sell mine. Because it has a replacement Chinese hood I'll be knocking a fair few quid off the price, let me know if you're interested.
how much? could be interested?
That will be fantastic. A 50-200WR could be useful in Patagonia. Otherwise 55-300 for IQ. Good IQ for the price and not much money to risk in a rugged environment. I'm about to sell mine. Because it has a replacement Chinese hood I'll be knocking a fair few quid off the price, let me know if you're interested.
Posted 11/01/2013 - 11:47
Link
thanks everyone. So i take it that means that third party models aren't quite as good as the 55-300?
Posted 11/01/2013 - 11:56
Link
Hi... I went trekking/camping in Patagonia (Chilean side) a few years ago around the Torres del Paine...
Firstly, congratulations... you'll have the most amazing trip...
Secondly, can't really comment on zooms, I'm afraid, but I'd definitely suggest taking at least one lens that's weatherproof... the weather in Patagonia is genuinely remarkable... it really can change on a sixpence... expect your DA*16-50 to come in very handy indeed... it's at its best when it's at its wildest...
I was there in November, just after they'd reopened some of the trails after winter... very cold, very wet, very windy and quite magnificent...
Enjoy
Firstly, congratulations... you'll have the most amazing trip...
Secondly, can't really comment on zooms, I'm afraid, but I'd definitely suggest taking at least one lens that's weatherproof... the weather in Patagonia is genuinely remarkable... it really can change on a sixpence... expect your DA*16-50 to come in very handy indeed... it's at its best when it's at its wildest...
I was there in November, just after they'd reopened some of the trails after winter... very cold, very wet, very windy and quite magnificent...
Enjoy
Posted 11/01/2013 - 11:56
Link
I think the 55-300 is best in class. It will be great for longer focal length landscapes. The SRS one is the DA-L version.
I'll have a think about a price and PM you. Otherwise Darkskies is flogging one too.
I'll have a think about a price and PM you. Otherwise Darkskies is flogging one too.
Posted 11/01/2013 - 12:20
Link
To suggest and alternative - I've always liked the Tamron 70-300 in the past. Don't need it now as I have the 55-300, which ever so slightly trumps it but it used to give great results, and a decent macro mode too which may give you more options that the 55-300.
Purple fringing appeared in high contrast situations though, but the upside is that you can usually get the 70-300 for around £70.
Here's a shot I took a while back now with it:

Purple fringing appeared in high contrast situations though, but the upside is that you can usually get the 70-300 for around £70.
Here's a shot I took a while back now with it:

Posted 11/01/2013 - 18:04
Link
thingsthatihaveseen wrote:
Hi... I went trekking/camping in Patagonia (Chilean side) a few years ago around the Torres del Paine...
Firstly, congratulations... you'll have the most amazing trip...
Secondly, can't really comment on zooms, I'm afraid, but I'd definitely suggest taking at least one lens that's weatherproof... the weather in Patagonia is genuinely remarkable... it really can change on a sixpence... expect your DA*16-50 to come in very handy indeed... it's at its best when it's at its wildest...
I was there in November, just after they'd reopened some of the trails after winter... very cold, very wet, very windy and quite magnificent...
Enjoy
thanks for the helpful advise. I can t wair!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
Hi... I went trekking/camping in Patagonia (Chilean side) a few years ago around the Torres del Paine...
Firstly, congratulations... you'll have the most amazing trip...
Secondly, can't really comment on zooms, I'm afraid, but I'd definitely suggest taking at least one lens that's weatherproof... the weather in Patagonia is genuinely remarkable... it really can change on a sixpence... expect your DA*16-50 to come in very handy indeed... it's at its best when it's at its wildest...
I was there in November, just after they'd reopened some of the trails after winter... very cold, very wet, very windy and quite magnificent...
Enjoy
Posted 11/01/2013 - 18:05
Link
Snootchies wrote:
To suggest and alternative - I've always liked the Tamron 70-300 in the past. Don't need it now as I have the 55-300, which ever so slightly trumps it but it used to give great results, and a decent macro mode too which may give you more options that the 55-300.
Purple fringing appeared in high contrast situations though, but the upside is that you can usually get the 70-300 for around £70.
Here's a shot I took a while back now with it:

Nice shot. Looks very clean. I will do a bit of research in to that one and get back to you. Cheers and thanks for the time
To suggest and alternative - I've always liked the Tamron 70-300 in the past. Don't need it now as I have the 55-300, which ever so slightly trumps it but it used to give great results, and a decent macro mode too which may give you more options that the 55-300.
Purple fringing appeared in high contrast situations though, but the upside is that you can usually get the 70-300 for around £70.
Here's a shot I took a while back now with it:

Add Comment
To leave a comment - Log in to Pentax User or create a new account.


424 posts
17 years
Really appreciate the feedback
http://www.mattbishopphotography.com/p532217924/e4e801e9e