More k-3 images inc ISO 3200


DrOrloff

Link Posted 16/10/2013 - 21:10
Can't really tell very much at all until the RAWs are available. The full size low iso jpegs released so far indicate possible worse noise performance than the K5 but that could be inept processing.
You can see some of my photos here if you are so inclined

cabstar

Link Posted 16/10/2013 - 21:25
Hard to say n that shot as the depth of field is very thin and the lighting is dark too
PPG Wedding photography Flickr
Concert photography

Currently on a Pentax hiatus until an FF Pentax is released

cameraboy

Link Posted 17/10/2013 - 01:19
redbusa99 wrote:
stuff all the colours i want a clear plastic one with light leakage compensation

Ditto!
k7 10-17fe 12-24 55 100 macro 18-55 50-200

Pentaxophile

Link Posted 17/10/2013 - 09:15
I'm not seeing any great improvement at 3200ISO, which I guess is as expected.
[link=https://500px.com/will_brealey/[/link]
Last Edited by Pentaxophile on 17/10/2013 - 09:26

Cuchulainn

Link Posted 17/10/2013 - 11:02
cameraboy wrote:
redbusa99 wrote:
stuff all the colours i want a clear plastic one with light leakage compensation

Ditto!

I don't know, I'd miss the blue if I swapped my k30 for a k3. It's nice not having another black camera

Mongoose

Link Posted 17/10/2013 - 11:48
I think it's unrealistic to expect the noise performance to be better than the K5. With 50% more pixels crammed in, no worse will be an impressive achievement in my book.
you don't have to be mad to post here



but it does help
Add a Comment
You must be registered or logged-in to comment.