Light weight Pentax dslr?
Posted 29/10/2012 - 21:25
Link
Pentax Q? Currently circa £230 on Amazon. Has just received a second firmware update. Not quite a DSLR but.... Or a K-01 body?
Dave
Dave
Posted 29/10/2012 - 21:40
Link
That's a bugger fourfivesix, I've got similar issues. I do creative things with both hands and let it hang from the shoulder strap as much as poss.
Q might indeed help
Pete
Q might indeed help
Pete
K-1 K-01 Q-7
some len
Close to the Edge
Down by the River
some len
Close to the Edge
Down by the River
Posted 29/10/2012 - 22:03
Link
Given that Pentax are probably the most compact DSLRs around and hardly bulky or heavy, compared to the other marques, it looks like the Q is the possible solution.
Best regards, John
Posted 29/10/2012 - 23:07
Link
I'd give a serious thought about the K 01. You can use all your lenses, so you'll be familiar with the coverage, and you won't have to invest in new lenses.
Also, the controls and functionality will be very close to the camera you already have, so getting used to the new camera will be easier.
Also, the controls and functionality will be very close to the camera you already have, so getting used to the new camera will be easier.
Yves (another one of those crazy Canucks)
Posted 30/10/2012 - 07:25
Link
The Q and K01 may well be contenders as others have suggested (love my Q).
However - if you are wanting to stick to a DSLR - let's not forget that the K200 is not one of the lightest - partially due to it's AA battery requirement.
The Kr is significantly lighter than the K200 (690g Vs 590g) and the Kx is marginally lighter than the Kr at 580 g - all of these weights include batteries.
Having owned a K200 and currently owning a Kr - I can honestly say that the Kr feels much lighter in the hand.
If I were you - I would try and get my hands on a Kr and see what you think.
Carl
However - if you are wanting to stick to a DSLR - let's not forget that the K200 is not one of the lightest - partially due to it's AA battery requirement.
The Kr is significantly lighter than the K200 (690g Vs 590g) and the Kx is marginally lighter than the Kr at 580 g - all of these weights include batteries.
Having owned a K200 and currently owning a Kr - I can honestly say that the Kr feels much lighter in the hand.
If I were you - I would try and get my hands on a Kr and see what you think.
Carl
No matter how many lenses I have owned - I have always needed just one more
Posted 30/10/2012 - 08:37
Link
The *ist DL is the lightest of the digital bodies at 470g (excluding batteries)
Or why not try the joys of film photography if some of your lenses will work with film bodies - all the MZ series apart of the the MZS are below 400g - some as light as 320g, and the *ist is a similar weight. Whats more they can be had for very little money. Battery and film only adds about 40g I think.
Or why not try the joys of film photography if some of your lenses will work with film bodies - all the MZ series apart of the the MZS are below 400g - some as light as 320g, and the *ist is a similar weight. Whats more they can be had for very little money. Battery and film only adds about 40g I think.
Tony Milner
Super A, ME Super, MZ6, K5II, Ricoh GR & lenses from 8-500mm
www.amilner.org
www.flickr.com/photos/tonymilner
Super A, ME Super, MZ6, K5II, Ricoh GR & lenses from 8-500mm
www.amilner.org
www.flickr.com/photos/tonymilner
Posted 30/10/2012 - 12:27
Link
Unless you have a no-no with the lack of viewfinder, then you really should check out the K-01. Its image quality is on par with the K5 (I've owned both) and it is smaller and lighter and you can get the black one for £349 from SRS (I was fortunate to get the silver at £299). Comparison between your K200, the K-r and K-01 at this link: http://www.pentaxforums.com/forums/pentax-cameras-compared/?c1=k200d&c2=kr&c3=k0...
Cheers
Tony
Cheers
Tony
Posted 30/10/2012 - 14:46
Link
You might want to try one of the plasticky Sony SLTs or the micro 4/3
K5iis and a couple of lenses.
Posted 30/10/2012 - 16:58
Link
TonyM wrote:
Unless you have a no-no with the lack of viewfinder, then you really should check out the K-01. Its image quality is on par with the K5 (I've owned both) and it is smaller and lighter and you can get the black one for £349 from SRS (I was fortunate to get the silver at £299). Comparison between your K200, the K-r and K-01 at this link: http://www.pentaxforums.com/forums/pentax-cameras-compared/?c1=k200d&c2=kr&c3=k0...
Cheers
Tony
to be honest it is the lack of a view finder that is putting me off, how is it to hold? as grip is one of the problems I'm having.
Unless you have a no-no with the lack of viewfinder, then you really should check out the K-01. Its image quality is on par with the K5 (I've owned both) and it is smaller and lighter and you can get the black one for £349 from SRS (I was fortunate to get the silver at £299). Comparison between your K200, the K-r and K-01 at this link: http://www.pentaxforums.com/forums/pentax-cameras-compared/?c1=k200d&c2=kr&c3=k0...
Cheers
Tony
flickr
link
link
Posted 30/10/2012 - 17:11
Link
Before I got it I was concerned that the ergonomics would be uncomfortable. Along with a lot of others (check the other forum) I find it very comfortable, with the size and rubber grip working really well. I think the Nex etc. are too thin to be comfortable. The button placement is probably the worst aspect, trying to reach the red/green.
I was also nervous about lack of viewfinder, but find I've adapted quite quickly. Bright sunshine is the main problem, but that's pretty rare at the moment! Focus peaking more than makes up for it.
If you can, you should get your hands on one - it is so different that you can't judge by photos or rely on the knee-jerk reactions.
Cheers
Tony
PS And I think it looks just great!
I was also nervous about lack of viewfinder, but find I've adapted quite quickly. Bright sunshine is the main problem, but that's pretty rare at the moment! Focus peaking more than makes up for it.
If you can, you should get your hands on one - it is so different that you can't judge by photos or rely on the knee-jerk reactions.
Cheers
Tony
PS And I think it looks just great!
Posted 30/10/2012 - 22:59
Link
I would have to disagree with Pentax cameras being light. My Canon 500D is A LOT lighter than either my K200D or the K5 .
the ebtry level cams from Canon (and I'd guess Nikon) are pretty light. Also as someone else has touched on I suspect Sony have some pretty light models too.
the ebtry level cams from Canon (and I'd guess Nikon) are pretty light. Also as someone else has touched on I suspect Sony have some pretty light models too.
- -
Mike
Pentax K5 / Pentax K5 11/ Pentax K200D / Canon Rebel T1 i / Canon 650D / Pentax MX-1 / Fuji XF1 /Fuji X 10 / Canon EOS-M / Canon G10/ Pentax Mz-7 x 2
Mike
Pentax K5 / Pentax K5 11/ Pentax K200D / Canon Rebel T1 i / Canon 650D / Pentax MX-1 / Fuji XF1 /Fuji X 10 / Canon EOS-M / Canon G10/ Pentax Mz-7 x 2
Posted 30/10/2012 - 23:36
Link
I was going to suggest Sony NEX, but the trouble with the NEX (except the NEX7) and for that matter the K01, is that you need to hold them out and compose using the lcd. Not ideal if your hands are unsteady. The Kr or Kx would be top of my list. The SR will be helpful although will add a small amount of weight compared to Canon / Nikon entry models.
Add Comment
To leave a comment - Log in to Pentax User or create a new account.


167 posts
14 years
Sheffield
I'm considiering buying a lighter dslr to combat this but my only experience with dslr cameras is the one I have. Can anyone point me in the right direction of a lighter alternative as I really dont want to jump ship and move to Nikon or Canon.
I'm not wanting to part with the k200d so I'm selling off some of my film cameras to fund this.
Thanks in advance
link