K-3iii: manual focussing using OVF
HTH
www.chrismillsphotography.co.uk
" A Hangover is something that occupies the Head you neglected to use the night before".
-------------------------------------------------------------
K1 - Sigma 85mm F1.4, Pentax DFA 150 -450 F4.5 / 5.6, Pentax DFA* 24 - 70 F2.8
Samyang 14mm F2.8, Pentax DFA* 70-200 F2.8, Pentax A 50mm F1.2
K3iii + K3ii + K5iis converted to IR, Sigma 17 - 70 F2.8, Pentax 55 - 300 F4.5 / F5.6 PLM
When I set my K3iii up re my eyesight, I focused on a brick wall with AF, then moved the diopter setting so the wall was sharp in the viewfinder, then focused on a fence panel, took a shot and zoomed in to make sure the fence was sharp checking the viewfinder was also sharp.
HTH
Interesting and helpful, Chris
Once set in this way, have you found that critical focussing using the OVF is possible irrespective of the lens attached and regardless of whether AF adjust has been dialed in on the camera for each specific lens?
Critical focus is checked on the computer as I can generally trust what the camera will give me, subject to me not getting it wrong LOL
www.chrismillsphotography.co.uk
" A Hangover is something that occupies the Head you neglected to use the night before".
-------------------------------------------------------------
K1 - Sigma 85mm F1.4, Pentax DFA 150 -450 F4.5 / 5.6, Pentax DFA* 24 - 70 F2.8
Samyang 14mm F2.8, Pentax DFA* 70-200 F2.8, Pentax A 50mm F1.2
K3iii + K3ii + K5iis converted to IR, Sigma 17 - 70 F2.8, Pentax 55 - 300 F4.5 / F5.6 PLM
Steve
Could it be that the K3 iii's focus screen guide lines aren't actually on the focus screen itself whereas they are with the previous cameras? The Ricoh website link says "The PENTAX K-3 Mark III features a transparent LCD viewfinder display that provides a broader range of data in the viewfinder window". Since you are setting the dipotre by focussing on the 'transparent LCD viewfinder display' rather than an image on the focus screen itself, what you think is in focus probably isn't.
Steve
Good point, Steve, and one that makes perfect sense in terms of what Chris has found to work well for him
K1000, Espio 140, ist, istD, K70, K3iii and numerous lenses, just don't tell my wife.
Like you I've struggled to get the diopter adjustment right to show a sharp image in the viewfinder when the auto focus confirm is lit.
The AF confirm is completely separate. It relies on the AF sensor. If the VF focus confirm (AF system) agrees with the LV, then your AF is working normally. If they do not agree with what you see in the VF then the fault is either :dioptre or mirror; or focus screen....or any combo.
A final thought for Jon....maybe your lens suffers from focus shift ?
My Flickr page
It's not that anything is out of alignment. As Chris, Jon and myself have found it is that the K3iii requires a different approach to setting the diopter adjustment. You cannot set the diopter by using the grid lines or speed/f number displayed in the viewfinder as I have done on all previous cameras but need to let the camera focus on an object and then adjust the diopter so the object is sharp in the viewfinder. To be doubly certain I now also deliberately look for the focus confirmation symbol. Because I don't wear spectacles when using a camera my diopter adjustment is nearly at its limits.
K1000, Espio 140, ist, istD, K70, K3iii and numerous lenses, just don't tell my wife.
My Flickr page
Very odd. So when you have adjusted the dioptre correctly for a focussed image, the gridlines/VF info display are not sharp ?
Correct. Just checking I have the diopter adjustment right on the limit and the VF info is not clear, it's as if the K3iii diopter adjustment has not got the same range as the K70. I'm going to change my approach and try keeping spectacles on and resetting the camera to suit that, see if I find that easier.
K1000, Espio 140, ist, istD, K70, K3iii and numerous lenses, just don't tell my wife.
www.chrismillsphotography.co.uk
" A Hangover is something that occupies the Head you neglected to use the night before".
-------------------------------------------------------------
K1 - Sigma 85mm F1.4, Pentax DFA 150 -450 F4.5 / 5.6, Pentax DFA* 24 - 70 F2.8
Samyang 14mm F2.8, Pentax DFA* 70-200 F2.8, Pentax A 50mm F1.2
K3iii + K3ii + K5iis converted to IR, Sigma 17 - 70 F2.8, Pentax 55 - 300 F4.5 / F5.6 PLM
Very odd. So when you have adjusted the dioptre correctly for a focussed image, the gridlines/VF info display are not sharp ?
In my case, Peter, they are, but just not quite as sharp as they could, and would be, if the OVF was used exclusively with the camera in AF mode.
The dioptre adjusment needed to bring the subject, rather than the guide overlay, in to sharp focus when using MF is minimal (1 step difference for my 'shooting' eye), but the impact on the proportion of 'keepers' (viewed at 100%) has been dramatic, incontrovertible and consistent, without further adjustment, for every lens I have tried thus far whether of Pentax or third-party manufacture.
Were it not for this discovery and it's sharing on this forum by Chris and Paul I suspect I would have returned the camera to SRS (bless 'em) for a refund
BW
Jon
Could it be that the K3 iii's focus screen guide lines aren't actually on the focus screen itself whereas they are with the previous cameras?
I imagine the K3III is the same as the K1. The grid lines/AF frame/Spot metering frame/crop frame are generated electronically. You can turn them on or off on the K-1.
My Flickr page
Add Comment
To leave a comment - Log in to Pentax User or create a new account.
599 posts
14 years
Wiltshire,
U.K.
Conscious that my experience might simply be one of life's strange coincidences, and not attributable to the characteristics/design of the K-3iii, I have compared the results obtained using the same lenses, subjects, distances, ISO/aperture settings and lighting and the differences are consistent, with accurate focussing using the OVF being possible on the K3 but not on its direct descendant.
Clearly, there are 'workarounds' such as learning to rely exclusively on the K-3iii's focus confirmation signals or adapting my technique and placing greater reliance on the use of live-view, but I am surprised that this should be necessary in order to enjoy the many advantages the camera offers over its predecessors.
My questions, then, are how common is my experience, should I be concerned that I might have purchased a sub-par example of the camera and, where others have found the same, what are the possible resolutions? In a thread discussing a similar problem on Pentax Forums, one suggested resolution was to 'calibrate' each lens (each day!) by using live-view to obtain critical focus and then switch to the OVF and obtain a similarly sharp virtual image on screen using the dioptre adjustment
Many thanks in anticipation of your considered thought/suggestions.
Jon