K-1 MKII ISO Comparison


Mike-P

Link Posted 22/02/2018 - 18:47
What do you think?

Due to archaic forum sizing rules please click on picture to see a proper comparison.


Pentax K-1 MARK II ISO 12800 by Mike.Pursey, on Flickr
. My Flickr

RobL

Link Posted 22/02/2018 - 19:03
Admittedly that is impressive.

derek897

Link Posted 22/02/2018 - 19:20
It is, isn't it.
I know what i like, If not always why.

HarisF1

Link Posted 22/02/2018 - 19:29
Very very tempted.
All the gear with no idea

pschlute

Link Posted 22/02/2018 - 20:32
Mike, where does that image come from? Maybe the site has a larger image I can look at. It is tiny to me.

But the difference certainly looks impressive.
Peter



My Flickr page

richandfleur

Link Posted 22/02/2018 - 22:44
That is impressive. Is that with Pixelshift as well?

darkskies

Link Posted 23/02/2018 - 08:43
If that is typical, then I'd have to be interested in that!

For those that were wondering about what the K-1 looked like at 12,800, and why I wouldn't use 12,800 for gig photography, then perhaps this comparison makes it obvious!
This space deliberately left blank.

johnriley

Link Posted 23/02/2018 - 09:06
It does and it doesn't darkskies, because gigs are usually brightly lit in the places that count. Even the MX-1 sensor doesn't show excessive noise at ISO 12,800 when the light is bright enough. It's the dark shadows that exaggerate it, as in the sample image. That's my experience anyway, although there are many different types of venue I guess.
Best regards, John

Mike-P

Link Posted 23/02/2018 - 09:16
pschlute wrote:
Mike, where does that image come from? Maybe the site has a larger image I can look at. It is tiny to me.

It's a screen grab off a video

richandfleur wrote:
That is impressive. Is that with Pixelshift as well?

Sorry, no idea.
. My Flickr
Last Edited by Mike-P on 23/02/2018 - 09:16
Add a Comment
You must be registered or logged-in to comment.