Jungle of the Night vol 2
I like number 2 - the colours are spectacular
proud owner of a couple of cameras and a few bits and bobs
Regards
I do not know what is much in PP, and what is too much.
here is the link to the original that is ONLY resized. Nothing else. As you can see, my post here is not even cropped.
The world around us is a little illustrative
I am using Gimp BTW.
PS. I will soon delete the original from my flickr site.
To be honest I don't like it that much but that's of course a personal taste so don't be discourage by it, you can't please everyone.
This isn't necessarily a bad thing though... it's quite striking!
True it is, we never can please everyone But this is the information that I am looking for - do many dislike/like and also why
Thanks for saying out what you think - whatever it is
I am really curious, what is this STRANGE about the trees. Will you try to explane, Stefan ?
(some other word than posterize filter Although I try to find it from gimp menu - just to see what Lennardinio ment )
Two of you mention the trees - so there has to be sth that I do not notice at the moment.
It's the transition on the tree, the shadows and highlight are very close together.
It's probably the lighting but it does look strange, and the lack of detail on the tree.
Lack of detail on treetrunks - this is sth that I understand already. I think it is the mistake of focusing. Its slightly behind the trees. Am I right ?
Apert. 8 again. Should have been greater. The mistake of all the night series.
Thanks a lot, Stefan !
It's the lighting that does it.
If I had taken the second one I'd be quite pleased with myself.
david
Add Comment
To leave a comment - Log in to Pentax User or create a new account.
694 posts
16 years
Estonia
????
----
Pentax K20D; SMC DA 18-55mm II kit; Sigma AF 70-300/4-5.6 APO DG MACRO
GIMP Flickr
PPG