*ist DS advantages over *ist D?
I told my wife that if the new camera looked like it had the same features as ist D I'd sell mine quickly before the new one was releleased, but I don't think I'll be doing that now! I'm not worried, especially considering the tiny size and SD memory.
It's third hand information I know, but apparently the *istD (and *istDS) do have interchangeable focus screens:
http://forums.dpreview.com/forums/read.asp?forum=1028&message=10263443
Matt
Thanks for the tip mattie! On closer inspection, I can see the retaining clip for removing the screen. Now for the fun part... finding someone who sells it!
In Germany it's www.TeKaDe.de who sells them. They are fitting in both Pentax DSLR.
Paul
Click Here and type Pentax ist in search window if it doesn't show straight away
The *ist-DS...
* has the same three meter modes
* has no hyper mode
* doesn't support TIFF (big deal!)
* uses SD cards, not CF
* cannot have a battery grip
* doesn't have an illuminated top LCD
* has a larger 2" colour LCD
* has only one white balance preset
* has only "AF", whereas the *istD has AF-C and AF-S
* has one custom preset (*istD has 3)
* doesn't appear to have mirror lock up
* has some extra features (like ISO warning and histogram preview, all of which could be addressed with an *istD firmware upgrade)
All in all, the *ist-DS looks an excellent beast! Much less of a feature crop when comparing the Canon 10D & 300D. But, I wonder how much the *istD will be hit, or how much extra Pentax will add to its firmware to make the price difference more worthy??
Matt
(For gallery, tips and links)
> The *ist-DS...
> * has only "AF", whereas the *istD has AF-C and AF-S
I was under the impression that the *istDs does have servo, but you can only access it if you use the appropriate shooting mode - in effect, you can't seperately control how you control exposure and how you control focus.
Have I got the wrong end of the stick?
Matt
The *ist-D has a three way switch to the left of the lens (as you are holding the camera): M=manual, AF-C=autofocus continuous, AF-S=autofocus single.
AF-C allows you to track moving targets without having to keep half pressing.
The *ist-DS has only "M" and "AF", presumably equivalent to the *ist-D "M" and "AF-S". Additionally, the *ist-D has an AF button on the back, and you can disable the focussing when you half press. I've found this useful in a few tricky situations - use the thumb to focus, and then use the finger for the shutter. You can't do that on the *ist-DS.
It looks like the *ist-DS is more point-and-shoot, but then it seems a very capable and flexible camera. Having spot focus is a real benefit (I used to have the MZ-5 which had spot, and my wife has the MZ-10 which doesn't but has "shooting" modes. She'll definitely love the *ist-DS!)
Hope that clarifies some more!
Matt
(For gallery, tips and links)
I think I've phrased my question/observation a bit weakly, I'll try again.
I was under the impression that the *istDS does (will) have both single and continuous (servo) focus, but you can't specifically choose one - by selecting the 'action' mode or whatever it is you actually get servo focus on the *istDS, whereas all other modes/programmes give you single focus. In this way the type of focus is inextricably linked to the mode of exposure calculation. I'm not even sure you can access servo focus outside of programme.
Basically, the focus on the *istDS is almost the same as the *istD save for the lack of a seperate switch.
Do you know if I'm correct in saying this?
Matt
Ahh! Now I understand. You're probably quite right I can't comment either way!!
Matt
(For gallery, tips and links)
Add Comment
To leave a comment - Log in to Pentax User or create a new account.
16 posts
20 years
Shropshire,
United Kingdom
It seems from the first looks on dpreview though that whilst there are some ergonomic improvements and minor improvements to the LCD panels and shooting speeds, overall they have left out a few things (some of which are surely just disabled in software) to leave the *ist D with an advantage. The new camera is also slightly smaller and lighter but I do not think I could cope with this as I have large hands. The *ist D is just about fine.
I am also not so sure the adoption of SD storage is a benefit. Perhaps that is just because of the decent investment I have made in CF cards though.
Overall, I am relieved. No doubt the experienced hands will have some strong views once more detailed reviews are available and some have had a chance to have a play.
Stuart