Irony...


Aitch53

Link Posted 29/06/2016 - 08:44
Well, with the combination of my 'problem' with DoF as mentioned in my Something Different - Flowers* thread in Your Photos and the much heralded arrival of the K-1, I found the recent post on the Online Photographer Blog concerning the advantages of crop sensors when you need more DoF amusingly ironic.






* I DO wish one of the mods would correct that thread title. Please?
SteveH!

Some people call me 'strange'.
I prefer 'unconventional'.
But I'm willing to compromise and accept 'eccentric'.

johnriley

Link Posted 29/06/2016 - 08:58
The f/64 group were using cameras that had very little DOF, so the smallest apertures would be needed.

Going back to 35mm-format with the K-1, I do need to stop down a bit more to get the desired DOF for flower portraits and similar subjects. For masses of DOF the MX-1 is a good choice, or the Q-S1 of course.

I'll have a look at your thread title now.
Best regards, John

Aitch53

Link Posted 29/06/2016 - 08:58
Thank you.

For really large amounts of DoF I have my pocket camera (P*n*s*n*c LF1)
or even the X-5 I still have lying around...
SteveH!

Some people call me 'strange'.
I prefer 'unconventional'.
But I'm willing to compromise and accept 'eccentric'.
Last Edited by Aitch53 on 29/06/2016 - 09:00
Add a Comment
You must be registered or logged-in to comment.