Interesting article in Amateur Photographer
The step up to K-5iis though and now the K-3 is more noticeable in terms of IQ. These two cameras easily surpass the K-x and the K-5, especially in terms of image detail, where the K-3 in particular excels due to its higher resolution. I can't wait to try the K-3 for insect macros this Summer, I'm expecting it to be superb for this type of photography, based on what I've experienced so far.
Regards
David
I can still remember the day I bought it from Jessops in a New year sale on 2nd Jan 2011, getting it home, and taking it out of the box and holding it for the first time, feeling how solid it felt with a fantastic weight to it compared to the rest of the market, I knew from that moment I would keep it till the end.
The only thing I don't like about my k100d super is the difficulty of cropping a 6mp image and menu diving to change settings. When funds allow I plan to get a k20 or k7.
The K100d super produces some great results. One thing about not being able to crop, is it means you learn to frame your shots better which is a great skill to learn.
need to release a FF
Come on Pentax we want a Retro *ist DL
Oh! for the good old days of 6MB cameras!
--
Pentax K-1 + K-5 and some other stuff
Algi
The only thing I don't like about my k100d super is the difficulty of cropping a 6mp image and menu diving to change settings. When funds allow I plan to get a k20 or k7.
The K100d super produces some great results. One thing about not being able to crop, is it means you learn to frame your shots better which is a great skill to learn.
I know, I shot 35mm slide film for years, but the less than 100% viewfinder means it can be difficult to make small adjustments without losing some vital mega-pixels
Although I've managed to get around that at times by increasing the image size by 10%.
The K-30 does allow the use of AA batteries I might add
Taking a look back here has been really interesting. The K100d certainly packs a punch, and it picked up the shake reduction. Everything from roughly page 4 onwards was taken with it.
I'll tell also that when I got the K-30 I was disappointed with how 'plasticy' it felt compared to the K100d. The dials seemed to be cheaper plastic and didn't feel as firm when selecting the modes etc. That surprised me initially.
Now though, I can't wait to get my K-30 back from the service. Honestly I'd recommend upgrading to new Pentax equipment, even if it's a K-30 or K-50 instead of the more expensive models. For me the increase in viewfinder coverage and brightness, and the dual mode wheels etc have really made it a joy to use. Oh, and I don't fear the rain anywhere near as much as those around me now either
Will I dispose of it? Unlikely.
Well this thread should convince Pentax that they don't
need to release a FF
Come on Pentax we want a Retro *ist DL
Oh! for the good old days of 6MB cameras!
--
But Algi,
The final image isn't the only reason people use FF, although some argue it is. It's because people have better options or more choice as far as kit and systems go. It's as much about using the kit as to what it produces which is down to the end user at the end of the day.
If Ricoh don't make a FF, so be it. There are plenty of other choices out there from companies that do. I'm shooting MF film, not because I find it better than digital but it's different and I just like using the camera and lenses.
As for a Ricoh Retro, yes, bring it on.
Best regards
Ed
Current DSLR: Pentax K3
Previously owned: Nikon D70, D50, D300s, D7000, D600, D800E/ Canon 50D & 7D/ Pentax *ist DS & K7
Add Comment
To leave a comment - Log in to Pentax User or create a new account.
437 posts
14 years
Budapest
Miss the ability to use AA batteries..
Not if you use a grip!
Good point well made!!!