Hyperfocal distance on a DSLR
very usefull site for all things photographic , hope this helps
odd lens or 2
Flickr


http://www.dofmaster.com/dofjs.html
It gives near, far, and hyperfocal distance for various sensors and settings!
Matt
http://www.mattmatic.co.uk
(For gallery, tips and links)

What I want to know is whether or not if, for example, I set the F stop at F4 that using F5.6 on the lens for HF would be the equivalent of F4 on a film camera?
Does that make any sense at all!!!??? Lol.
Mac
macmccreery.com
www.flickr.com/photos/simac/
www.500px.com/simac
Barrie
Too Old To Die Young
http://www.pentaxphotogallery.com/artists/barrieforbes
https://www.flickr.com/photos/189482630@N03/
Best regards, John

Barrie
Too Old To Die Young
http://www.pentaxphotogallery.com/artists/barrieforbes
https://www.flickr.com/photos/189482630@N03/
Does that mean if you set infinity at f16 the DOF will only be between the f11 marks
macmccreery.com
www.flickr.com/photos/simac/
www.500px.com/simac
Page 94 of the K-5 manual tells us that the DOF difference is one aperture stop compared to a 35mm film camera.
macmccreery.com
www.flickr.com/photos/simac/
www.500px.com/simac
Then forget comparisons altogether and just stick to learning what the format you use can do.
There was never a published "120 format-equivalent" figure for the benefit of 35mm users. The only reason we now have "35mm-equivalent" is that digital is not just one format, but many different formats. It gives at least some reference point between cameras.
Best regards, John

Rather than make comparisons though, just bear in mind that smaller formats show more DOF.
Then forget comparisons altogether and just stick to learning what the format you use can do.
There was never a published "120 format-equivalent" figure for the benefit of 35mm users. The only reason we now have "35mm-equivalent" is that digital is not just one format, but many different formats. It gives at least some reference point between cameras.
macmccreery.com
www.flickr.com/photos/simac/
www.500px.com/simac
Rather than make comparisons though, just bear in mind that smaller formats show more DOF.
Then forget comparisons altogether and just stick to learning what the format you use can do.
There was never a published "120 format-equivalent" figure for the benefit of 35mm users. The only reason we now have "35mm-equivalent" is that digital is not just one format, but many different formats. It gives at least some reference point between cameras.
Surely '120 format' never existed either, 120 film is used in a range of different formats from 6*4.5 to 6*12 from what I've read (My own MF being a 6*9).
Mike
.
Pentax:K5ii, K7, K100D, DA18-55, DA10-17, DA55-300, DA50-200, F100-300, F50, DA35 AL, 4* M50, 2* M135, Helicoid extension, Tak 300 f4 (& 6 film bodies)
3rd Party: Bigmos (Sigma 150-500mm OS HSM),2* 28mm, 100mm macro, 28-200 zoom, 35-80 zoom, 80-200 zoom, 80-210 zoom, 300mm M42, 600 mirror, 1000-4000 scope, 50mm M42, enlarger lenses, Sony & micro 4/3 cameras with various PK mounts, Zenit E...
Far to many tele-converters, adapters, project parts & extension tubes etc.
.[size=11:].Flickr• WPF• Panoramio
Best regards, John
Yves (another one of those crazy Canucks)
Simonmac
Plus Member
Birmingham
I have recently bought a number of manual lenses for my K-r.
When I used film I often used hyperfocal using the distance scale and aperture markings on the lens.
I presume this is possible with a DSLR and manual lenses if you take in to account the smaller sensor as compared to film?
Could somebody please enlighten me? Would it be as simple as configuring the HF at a smaller aperture than set on the lens?
Many thanks
Mac
macmccreery.com
www.flickr.com/photos/simac/
www.500px.com/simac