How much would you pay for this?
6,724 posts
Link
Posted 28/04/2015 - 18:08
I think its an image of great beauty by Edward Stiechen, I think. So probably beyond price.
Ken
“We must avoid however, snapping away, shooting quickly and without thought, overloading ourselves with unnecessary images that clutter our memory and diminish the clarity of the whole.” - Henri Cartier-Bresson -
Ken
“We must avoid however, snapping away, shooting quickly and without thought, overloading ourselves with unnecessary images that clutter our memory and diminish the clarity of the whole.” - Henri Cartier-Bresson -
Link
Posted 28/04/2015 - 20:05
I posted earlier. Too much but it seems to have vanished...
David
David
Link
Posted 28/04/2015 - 20:12
Nothing there David, you must have failed to post for some reason.
Best regards, John
Best regards, John
Link
Posted 28/04/2015 - 20:14
In 2006 it sold for $2.928M which was then a record price for a photo. I don't know if it has been resold recently, or if another photo has subsequently sold for more.
K.
Kris Lockyear
It is an illusion that photos are made with the camera… they are made with the eye, heart and head. Henri Cartier-Bresson
Lots of film bodies, a couple of digital ones, too many lenses (mainly older glass) and a Horseman LE 5x4.
My website
K.
Kris Lockyear
It is an illusion that photos are made with the camera… they are made with the eye, heart and head. Henri Cartier-Bresson
Lots of film bodies, a couple of digital ones, too many lenses (mainly older glass) and a Horseman LE 5x4.
My website
Link
Posted 28/04/2015 - 20:33
johnriley wrote:
Nothing there David, you must have failed to post for some reason.
Nothing there David, you must have failed to post for some reason.
probably famed tablet fingers
David
Link
Posted 28/04/2015 - 20:35
And predictive text
David
David
Link
Posted 28/04/2015 - 21:18
Reminds me very much of this, which is the most expensive I'm aware of:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Rhein_II
I'm no art critic, but I know complete rubbish when I see it, and I have to say the picture in the original post and Rhein II fall into exactly the same category.
Pentax hybrid user - Digital K3 & K200D, film 645 and 35mm SLR and Pentax (&other) lenses adapted to Fuji X digital
Fan of DA limited and old manual lenses
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Rhein_II
I'm no art critic, but I know complete rubbish when I see it, and I have to say the picture in the original post and Rhein II fall into exactly the same category.
Pentax hybrid user - Digital K3 & K200D, film 645 and 35mm SLR and Pentax (&other) lenses adapted to Fuji X digital
Fan of DA limited and old manual lenses
37 posts
Link
Posted 28/04/2015 - 22:04
Jonathan-Mac wrote:
Reminds me very much of this, which is the most expensive I'm aware of:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Rhein_II
I'm no art critic, but I know complete rubbish when I see it, and I have to say the picture in the original post and Rhein II fall into exactly the same category.
Reminds me very much of this, which is the most expensive I'm aware of:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Rhein_II
I'm no art critic, but I know complete rubbish when I see it, and I have to say the picture in the original post and Rhein II fall into exactly the same category.
I haven't seen it in the flesh but have read people online saying they thought it was rubbish but when seen in a gallery its a very different thing, its 1.9m x 3.6m so I guess that is never going to translate well to a small web picture
Pentax K-50
https://www.flickr.com/photos/103386117@N06/
Link
Posted 28/04/2015 - 23:01
LOL - Indeed
[i]Bodies: 1x K-5IIs, 2x K-5, Sony TX-5, Nokia 808
Lenses: Pentax DA 10-17mm ED(IF) Fish Eye, Pentax DA 14mm f/2.8, Sigma 17-70mm f/2.8, Pentax-A 28mm f/2.8, Sigma 30mm F1.4 EX DC, Pentax-A 50mm f/1.2, Pentax-A 50mm f/1.4, Pentax-FA 50mm f/1.4, Pentax-A 50mm f/1.7, Pentax DA* 50-135mm f/2.8, Sigma 135-400mm APO DG, and more ..
Flash: AF-540FGZ, Vivitar 283
Link
Posted 28/04/2015 - 23:04
michaelblue wrote:
Anyone like to guess how much someone paid for THIS?
Anyone like to guess how much someone paid for THIS?
I don't find it anything special whatsoever so nothing, but in the pretentious kings new clothes snobby art world someone probably paid millions for it.
[i]Bodies: 1x K-5IIs, 2x K-5, Sony TX-5, Nokia 808
Lenses: Pentax DA 10-17mm ED(IF) Fish Eye, Pentax DA 14mm f/2.8, Sigma 17-70mm f/2.8, Pentax-A 28mm f/2.8, Sigma 30mm F1.4 EX DC, Pentax-A 50mm f/1.2, Pentax-A 50mm f/1.4, Pentax-FA 50mm f/1.4, Pentax-A 50mm f/1.7, Pentax DA* 50-135mm f/2.8, Sigma 135-400mm APO DG, and more ..
Flash: AF-540FGZ, Vivitar 283
Link
Posted 29/04/2015 - 00:56
If it was something I'd taken myself, it would go into the reject pile without even getting printed.
But we all like different things, fortunately I never seem to particularly like things that attract big price stickers.
But we all like different things, fortunately I never seem to particularly like things that attract big price stickers.
:
Add a Comment
You must be registered or logged-in to comment.
michaelblue
Member
Shropshire
Regards,
Michael
My new website:link